ON
← Back to feed
United Nations calls for an end to crackdown on civic freedoms in Uganda
France🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

United Nations calls for an end to crackdown on civic freedoms in Uganda

The United Nations human rights office has raised concerns about the Ugandan government's actions restricting civil liberties and suppressing dissent. The report highlights increased repression against opposition figures, journalists, activists, and civil society organizations, including enforced disappearances, torture, arbitrary arrests, and the suspension of 10 major civil society groups. The OHCHR criticized the erosion of the rule of law, military interference in civilian institutions, and the detention of opposition leader Kizza Besigye, who collapsed during a court hearing. The organization urged Ugandan authorities to comply with international human rights standards and protect freedom of expression.

The United Nations human rights office has raised concerns about a growing crackdown on civic freedoms in Uganda, urging authorities to halt actions that restrict political dissent and limit public participation. In a statement released on Thursday, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) highlighted a pattern of human rights violations targeting opposition figures, journalists, and civil society members. The agency noted that these measures are contributing to an environment of fear and self-censorship, undermining democratic principles and the rule of law. According to the OHCHR, at least 50 opposition leaders and supporters, along with five human rights defenders and five journalists, have been subjected to human rights abuses since the country's general elections on 15 January. These violations include enforced disappearances, torture, and arbitrary detention, all of which the UN claims violate international human rights standards. The organization also reported that 10 major civil society organizations have been suspended since January, with others facing heightened scrutiny and, in some instances, harassment. Additionally, several media outlets have reportedly been compelled to suspend operations temporarily. The situation has intensified following the hospitalization of 70-year-old opposition leader Kizza Besigye, who collapsed during a court hearing. Besigye, who has been in custody since 2024, faces treason charges related to an alleged conspiracy against President Yoweri Museveni. His recent hospitalization has drawn attention to the broader context of political repression and the challenges faced by critics of the government. The OHCHR criticized the increasing role of the military in civilian affairs, noting that such involvement contradicts constitutional norms and international agreements. The agency emphasized that the current climate is fostering polarization and limiting open discourse, making it difficult for citizens to engage in public life without fear of reprisal. It urged Ugandan authorities to adhere to their commitments under the African Charter, the Ugandan Constitution, and international human rights law. In response to the allegations, the Ugandan government has yet to issue a formal statement. However, officials have previously defended their actions as necessary to maintain national security and stability. They argue that certain individuals have engaged in activities that threaten the state, including inciting violence or undermining the authority of elected leaders. This stance reflects a long-standing tension between the ruling party and opposition groups, which has escalated in recent years. Civil society representatives and international observers have expressed alarm over the trend of restricting free expression and association. Many point to the growing number of arrests and the suspension of independent media as clear indicators of a tightening grip on power. Activists have warned that these developments could lead to a more authoritarian governance model, eroding the foundations of democracy in Uganda. As the situation continues to evolve, the OHCHR has called for urgent action to protect fundamental rights and restore trust in the justice system. It has recommended that authorities investigate all reported abuses and take steps to ensure that individuals can exercise their right to freedom of speech and assembly without fear of retaliation. The outcome of this appeal will likely depend on how the Ugandan government responds to these appeals for accountability and reform.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Africanews logoAfricanewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 80yesterday
United Nations calls for an end to crackdown on civic freedoms in Uganda

The United Nations human rights office has raised concerns about the Ugandan government's actions restricting civil liberties and suppressing dissent. The report highlights increased repression against opposition figures, journalists, activists, and civil society organizations, including enforced disappearances, torture, arbitrary arrests, and the suspension of 10 major civil society groups. The OHCHR criticized the erosion of the rule of law, military interference in civilian institutions, and the detention of opposition leader Kizza Besigye, who collapsed during a court hearing. The organization urged Ugandan authorities to comply with international human rights standards and protect freedom of expression.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a violation of human rights and democratic norms, emphasizing the suppression of dissent and the erosion of civil liberties. It presents the actions of the Ugandan government as authoritarian and criticizes the lack of adherence to international human rights laws.

Why factuality (85): The article reports statements from the OHCHR, which is a recognized UN body, and provides specific numbers and examples of human rights violations. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that there has been a crackdown on dissent in Uganda following the January elections. However, the lack of pr

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the OHCHR's concerns in a neutral manner but uses emotionally charged language such as 'appalled,' 'stifling,' and 'deepening polarisation.' While it does not overtly take sides, the tone leans towards criticism of the Ugandan government, which affects objectivity.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories