ON
← Back to feed
Union minister Jual Oram alleges plot to oust him from Cabinet, warns of 'ability to cut off their hands'
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative8/29/2026

Union minister Jual Oram alleges plot to oust him from Cabinet, warns of 'ability to cut off their hands'

Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accused fellow party members of orchestrating a campaign to damage his reputation and remove him from the Cabinet. Oram claimed that some BJP leaders were attempting to undermine his position, believing they could replace him as a minister. His remarks followed the arrest of his aide, Rakesh Paswan, in connection with an organized crime case. Oram stated he would identify those responsible for the alleged conspiracy and vowed to take strong action, including metaphorically 'cutting off their hands' and 'burning them.' Opposition parties, including the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) and Congress, criticized Oram's comments, accusing the BJP of internal divisions and suggesting his remarks undermined law and order. The BJD and Congress condemned the threat of personal retribution, calling it inconsistent with democratic values.

Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram has accused unnamed individuals within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of orchestrating a campaign to damage his reputation and remove him from the Union Cabinet. His claims come after one of his aides, Rakesh Paswan, was arrested in Odisha's Rourkela on suspicion of involvement in an organized crime case. Paswan has denied the allegations against him. Oram stated that certain BJP members, many of whom had previously belonged to other political parties, were using financial resources to spread negative information about him, hoping to secure his removal from the ministry so they could take his place in the Union cabinet. The minister, who represents the tribal-majority Sundergarh Lok Sabha constituency in Odisha, confirmed that he had no objections to legal action being taken against Paswan, who was reportedly arrested for allegedly sheltering criminals at a government-run guest house in Rourkela. Oram emphasized that he had long since decided not to contest future elections but said the current developments had forced him to reconsider that stance. He declared that he would definitely contest the 2029 general elections. In a strongly worded statement, Oram said he intended to identify those responsible for the alleged conspiracy against him and had already brought the matter to the attention of the Odisha BJP organizing secretary. He vowed to take strict measures against those involved. “I will certainly take strong action against them. I have the ability to cut off the hands of anyone who defames me... and burn them,” he said during a press briefing. The minister’s statements sparked immediate criticism from opposition parties. Pramila Mallik, the chief whip of the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), noted that Oram’s remarks indicated deep-seated internal conflicts within the BJP. She argued that the party leadership was preoccupied with infighting rather than focusing on governance. Lenin Mohanty, a spokesperson for the BJD, pointed out that Oram’s comments raised concerns about the state’s law and order situation. “How can someone in a high office make such a statement about taking the law into their own hands?” Mohanty questioned. Similarly, Bhakta Charan Das, president of the Odisha Pradesh Congress Committee, condemned Oram’s remarks as inappropriate and reflective of the BJP’s authoritarian tendencies. He criticized the idea of resorting to violence, stating that India, a nation founded on principles of non-violence, should not tolerate such rhetoric. “There is no place for violence in our country,” Das said, referencing Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy of peaceful resistance. The controversy surrounding Oram’s aide’s arrest has drawn attention to broader issues within the BJP in Odisha. While Oram insists that the legal process against Paswan is legitimate, he has framed the incident as part of a larger effort to undermine his standing. His assertion that he would consider contesting the upcoming general elections signals a potential shift in his political strategy. Meanwhile, the Odisha BJP organizing secretary has yet to publicly address the minister’s accusations, though internal discussions are likely ongoing. The situation highlights tensions within the ruling party in the state, particularly as it relates to the balance of power among its key figures. With the 2029 elections approaching, the dynamics within the BJP could play a crucial role in shaping the political landscape of Odisha. As the investigation into Paswan continues, all eyes remain on whether the allegations against him hold merit and how the broader implications of Oram’s claims might unfold.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 708/29/2026
Conspiracy being hatched to tarnish my image, remove me from Union Ministry: Jual Oram

Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram accused certain individuals within the BJP of launching a campaign to damage his reputation and remove him from his post, following the arrest of his aide Rakesh Paswan on allegations of harboring criminals. Oram stated that these individuals, many of whom switched parties to join the BJP, believe removing him would allow them to gain ministerial positions. He emphasized that he would take strong action against those involved and hinted at possibly contesting the 2029 general elections despite previously stating he would not run again. His claims sparked criticism from opposition parties like the BJD and Congress, who argued that his remarks highlighted internal conflicts within the BJP and raised concerns about law and order in Odisha. They criticized his suggestion of taking matters into his own hands as inappropriate and reflective of extremist tendencies.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the statements of Jual Oram, a high-ranking BJP minister, accusing others of conspiring against him. While the article includes responses from opposition parties, the framing emphasizes Oram's accusations and his threat of 'strong action,' which aligns with a right-leaning tone.

Why factuality (80): This article provides detailed accounts of Oram's claims, including the arrest of his aide and his statements about the conspiracy. It cites sources like ANI and mentions the response from the opposition, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. The reporting is thorough and consistent with oth

Why objectivity (70): While the article presents Oram's claims objectively, there is a slightly more dramatic emphasis on his threats, such as 'cut off their hands,' which might lean into sensationalism rather than purely factual reporting.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 658/29/2026
Union minister Jual Oram alleges plot to oust him from Cabinet, warns of 'ability to cut off their hands'

Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accused fellow party members of orchestrating a campaign to damage his reputation and remove him from the Cabinet. Oram claimed that some BJP leaders were attempting to undermine his position, believing they could replace him as a minister. His remarks followed the arrest of his aide, Rakesh Paswan, in connection with an organized crime case. Oram stated he would identify those responsible for the alleged conspiracy and vowed to take strong action, including metaphorically 'cutting off their hands' and 'burning them.' Opposition parties, including the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) and Congress, criticized Oram's comments, accusing the BJP of internal divisions and suggesting his remarks undermined law and order. The BJD and Congress condemned the threat of personal retribution, calling it inconsistent with democratic values.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Oram's accusations as a reflection of internal BJP factionalism and portrays opposition criticism as legitimate concerns about the party's governance. While the content is factual, the emphasis on Oram's threats and the portrayal of opposition reactions as valid critiques aligns a

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the allegations made by Union minister Jual Oram against BJP colleagues, including the arrest of his aide Rakesh Paswan and Oram's threat to take action. It references multiple sources like ANI and PTI, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, the phrase 'abi

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat confrontational, with Oram's threats being emphasized. While the facts are reported, there is a slight editorial tilt towards highlighting the seriousness of the accusations, though not overtly biased.

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 608/28/2026
‘Conspiracy to oust me from Cabinet’: Union minister accuses BJP colleagues of smear campaign

A Union minister from India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused fellow party members of orchestrating a conspiracy to remove him from the Cabinet. The minister claims there is a smear campaign against him, alleging that his colleagues are working behind the scenes to undermine his position. The accusation comes amid ongoing political tensions within the BJP, which has been grappling with internal divisions over various policy issues and leadership dynamics. The minister did not specify the nature of the alleged conspiracy or provide evidence to support his claim.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the minister's accusations as a legitimate grievance, emphasizing the 'conspiracy' and 'smear campaign' by BJP colleagues. This suggests a left-leaning perspective that highlights the potential misuse of power within the party and supports the minister's stance against perceived打压

Why factuality (70): The article briefly summarizes Oram's allegations but lacks specific details compared to the other articles. It mentions the arrest of Rakesh Paswan and Oram's threat, but does not provide full context or quotes from other sources, making it less aligned with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (60): The tone is more direct and less nuanced, focusing primarily on the accusation without elaborating on the broader implications or responses from other parties. This results in a less balanced presentation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories