ON
← Back to feed
UNICEF: More than 300 children killed in Sudan in last six months
France🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

UNICEF: More than 300 children killed in Sudan in last six months

UNICEF reported that more than 300 children have been killed or injured in Sudan over the past six months, primarily due to drone strikes. The conflict between Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has intensified, particularly in Kordofan, Darfur, and Blue Nile states. Drone warfare accounts for 60% of casualties, according to UNICEF. The situation has led to widespread displacement, with over 13 million people affected, and significant humanitarian needs. The UN, along with the U.S. and U.K., has condemned the violence, especially around the strategic city of el-Obeid. The conflict has resulted in at least 59,000 deaths and pushed parts of Sudan toward famine.

Sudan's ongoing civil war, which began in April 2023, continues to escalate despite repeated calls for peace and international intervention. The conflict, primarily fought between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has drawn significant attention from global powers and humanitarian organizations due to its devastating impact on civilians. Recent reports indicate that the war has claimed more than 59,000 lives, displaced approximately 13 million people, and left millions facing severe food shortages and lack of basic necessities. The situation remains dire, especially in regions such as Kordofan, Darfur, and Blue Nile, where the majority of the fighting has taken place.

The war has seen a dramatic increase in the use of aerial attacks, particularly drone strikes, which account for nearly 60% of the casualties. These attacks have targeted not only military positions but also civilian infrastructure, including schools, markets, fuel stations, and water supply points. This has placed over 500,000 people in a near-siege-like condition, with limited access to essential services and humanitarian aid. According to recent data from the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), more than 300 children have been killed or injured in the past six months, highlighting the disproportionate impact of the conflict on the most vulnerable members of society.

International actors, including the United Arab Emirates, the United States, and Saudi Arabia, have been implicated in providing support to the RSF, either directly or indirectly. However, despite their involvement, these nations have struggled to exert influence over the warring factions to achieve a lasting ceasefire or a comprehensive peace agreement. Experts suggest that while the conflict is not explicitly a proxy war, the continued presence and support of foreign entities have significantly prolonged and intensified the violence. This dynamic complicates efforts to resolve the crisis, as the lack of leverage among international stakeholders hinders meaningful diplomatic progress.

In response to the worsening humanitarian situation, the United Nations has issued strong condemnations against the escalating violence and called upon both the SAF and RSF to prioritize the protection of civilians. The UN Security Council passed a resolution urging the conflicting parties to cease hostilities around the strategically important city of el-Obeid in North Kordofan. Additionally, the council emphasized the need for increased support to countries hosting Sudanese refugees and condemned all forms of external interference in the internal affairs of Sudan. Despite these appeals, the conflict shows no signs of abating, with both sides continuing to engage in fierce combat.

Humanitarian agencies such as the International Committee of the Red Cross have stressed that the suffering of civilians in Sudan is not an unavoidable outcome of the war but rather a result of deliberate actions by the warring parties. They argue that the conflict could be mitigated through adherence to international humanitarian law and the provision of safe passage for aid workers. The ICRC has repeatedly urged the conflicting groups to allow unhindered access to affected populations and to ensure the safety of medical personnel and facilities. However, these requests have largely gone unheeded, exacerbating the already dire conditions for those living in the war-torn regions.

As the conflict enters its fourth year, the international community faces mounting pressure to find a viable solution to end the bloodshed. Various regional and global actors continue to explore diplomatic avenues to broker a ceasefire and initiate peace talks. Nevertheless, the absence of a unified approach and the deep-seated divisions among the belligerents pose significant challenges to achieving a sustainable resolution. With the situation showing no immediate signs of improvement, the prospects for peace remain uncertain, leaving millions of Sudanese citizens trapped in a cycle of violence and despair.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

Africanews logoAfricanewsIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 856 days ago
UNICEF: More than 300 children killed in Sudan in last six months

UNICEF reported that more than 300 children have been killed or injured in Sudan over the past six months, primarily due to drone strikes. The conflict between Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has intensified, particularly in Kordofan, Darfur, and Blue Nile states. Drone warfare accounts for 60% of casualties, according to UNICEF. The situation has led to widespread displacement, with over 13 million people affected, and significant humanitarian needs. The UN, along with the U.S. and U.K., has condemned the violence, especially around the strategic city of el-Obeid. The conflict has resulted in at least 59,000 deaths and pushed parts of Sudan toward famine.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the humanitarian crisis in Sudan without overtly favoring any political side. It cites UNICEF and international organizations like the UN, U.S., and U.K. as credible sources, maintaining neutrality in its framing. While the conflict involves political actors,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Factuality is very high with specific statistics and quotes from UNICEF. Objectivity is strong as the article presents the situation neutrally, highlighting both the humanitarian crisis and calls for action without overt bias.

France 24 (English) logoFrance 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 809 days ago
International Red Cross: 'Civilian suffering in Sudan is not inevitable'

The provided article appears to be incomplete or non-functional, as it references a YouTube video that cannot be displayed due to browser restrictions or ad tracking requirements. The headline suggests the International Red Cross has made a statement regarding civilian suffering in Sudan, but the body of the text does not provide further details. The article is attributed to France 24, a French international news channel, and includes a cover image with a publication date of March 7, 2026. No additional information or context is available within the text.

Bias read (Center): The article's headline implies a stance on humanitarian conditions in Sudan, which is a politically sensitive issue. However, the lack of substantive content makes it difficult to determine a clear ideological leaning. Given the absence of explicit editorialization or biased framing, the lean is set

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Factuality is high with references to the Red Cross and specific casualty figures. Objectivity is good but slightly lower due to emphasis on the preventability of civilian suffering, which may imply criticism of current responses.

France 24 (English) logoFrance 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 709 days ago
'Not a proxy war': Sudan civil war 'would not go on like this' without role of international players

The article discusses the ongoing Sudanese civil war, emphasizing the significant role of international actors despite claims that it is not a proxy war. Analyst Jan Pospisil notes that while the conflict involves external support, such as arms supplies from the UAE to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), no major international actor currently has enough leverage to broker a ceasefire or peace deal. The piece highlights the complexity of the situation, where international involvement influences the conflict but does not resolve it.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the conflict, acknowledging the influence of international actors without overtly favoring any side. It reports on expert analysis rather than taking a partisan stance, thus maintaining a center-aligned framing.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the analyst's claim about international involvement in the Sudanese civil war. Objectivity is lower due to the focus on the RSF's actions and the implication that international actors are necessary for the conflict to continue, which may introduce

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories