The Hungarian president has taken steps toward his own removal, following the approval of a constitutional amendment that includes provisions for his ousting. The process was initiated after weeks of hesitation, culminating in the formal acceptance of the reform by President Tamás Sulyok on Saturday. According to reports from HVG.hu, Sulyok’s term will expire on Monday, marking the end of his tenure as head of state. Until a new president is elected, the parliamentary speaker, Agnes Forsthoffer, will assume his duties temporarily. This transition period allows 30 days for the parliament to select a successor, as the president in Hungary is chosen by the legislature. Premier Péter Magyar had previously set a five-day deadline for Sulyok to sign the amendment, threatening legal action should he refuse. Magyar described Sulyok as “a puppet” of the former government led by Viktor Orbán, who was ousted in April. The amendment, which Sulyok ultimately approved, includes measures aimed at curbing political power, such as limiting the terms of constitutional judges to their 70th birthday and restricting the mandates of lawmakers to 12 years starting in 2030. These changes aim to prevent long-term dominance by individuals like Orbán, who held office continuously since 1990. Magyar also announced plans to draft a completely new constitution, replacing the one enacted under Orbán’s rule in 2011. He criticized the existing framework for being overly tailored to the interests of his party, Fidesz. The proposed reforms are intended to restore public trust in governance and ensure that power is more evenly distributed among citizens. However, Magyar's recent efforts have faced setbacks. His attempt to appoint Judit Polgár, a world-renowned chess champion, as the next president sparked controversy. Although Magyar praised her achievements and suggested she could unite the divided nation, Polgár rejected the offer within hours. She stated on her Facebook page that she did not feel equipped to “unite the split nation.” The move was widely regarded as a misstep, with critics accusing Magyar of acting hastily and without proper consultation. Polgár’s rejection has been interpreted as reflecting broader societal tensions. Some commentators noted that her refusal might signal deeper frustrations stemming from the 16 years of Orbán’s rule, during which many felt marginalized. While some groups initially supported her candidacy, others questioned her lack of political experience and raised concerns about her Jewish heritage, despite her open discussions about her family’s Holocaust history. These criticisms were dismissed by Polgár, who emphasized her focus on education and youth development through her foundation. Magyar’s decision to propose Polgár without consulting her directly drew sharp criticism. On social media platforms, users expressed disappointment, questioning whether she possessed the necessary qualifications for the role. Others pointed out that Magyar had earlier called for a public debate over the choice of the next president, yet he bypassed this process with a unilateral announcement. Despite these challenges, Magyar maintained that the selection was merely a temporary measure, with a new constitutional drafting process planned for later this year, potentially leading to a direct election of the president. While the political landscape remains uncertain, the situation highlights both the potential and pitfalls of rapid change in leadership. With the parliamentary elections approaching, the search for a suitable interim president continues, and the outcome of this process will likely shape the trajectory of Hungary’s future governance.
5 reports
Der StandardIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8014 days agoThe President of Hungary, Tamás Sulyok, has approved a constitutional amendment that allows for his own removal from office. His term will end on Monday after the amendment takes effect, and the duties of the presidency will temporarily fall to the Speaker of Parliament, Agnes Forsthoffer. The new Prime Minister, Péter Magyar, criticized Sulyok as a 'puppet' of the former Viktor Orbán government and announced plans for significant political reforms. These include ending the mandates of constitutional judges at age 70, limiting parliamentary terms to 12 years starting in 2030, and creating a position to reclaim state-owned assets. Magyar also stated intentions to draft a completely new constitution to replace the one introduced by Orbán in 2011.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of the new government under Péter Magyar as a corrective to the previous regime led by Viktor Orbán, using terms like 'Marionette' to describe Sulyok and emphasizing the return of power to the people. It highlights reforms aimed at limiting the influence of the former,
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the constitutional change leading to Sulyok’s removal and Magyar’s characterization of him as a 'marionette' of Orbán. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the political developments.
Why objectivity (80): While the article presents the facts objectively, it includes some direct quotes from Magyar that frame Sulyok negatively, introducing a slight bias in favor of Magyar’s position.
Der StandardIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7512 days ago Péter Magyar wants chess master Judit Polgár at the head of the stateHungary's Prime Minister Péter Magyar has proposed former chess champion Judit Polgár as the country's next president, despite criticism. The suggestion came after the resignation of President Tamás Sulyok due to a constitutional amendment. While Magyar praised Polgár for her exceptional talent and integrity, critics argue she lacks political experience and did not oppose the authoritarian regime of Viktor Orbán. In parliamentary debates, Magyar backtracked, calling the selection a temporary measure until a new constitution allows for a popular vote. He previously supported direct presidential elections but now emphasizes the need for further discussion.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposal of Judit Polgár as a progressive move, highlighting her non-political background and personal qualities rather than her lack of political experience. It presents Magyar's support as forward-thinking while downplaying the criticisms against Polgár, which focus on her o
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports that Magyar nominated Judit Polgár for the presidency and highlights the public backlash he received. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides relevant background on Polgár.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the event with a somewhat critical tone, especially in highlighting the public criticism of Magyar’s choice. It includes direct quotes that reflect the opposition’s viewpoint, which may influence the reader’s perception.
Der StandardIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7011 days ago 'Disappointment and fiasco': Hungarian Prime Minister Péter Magyar's first failureThe article discusses the failed attempt by Hungary's new Prime Minister Péter Magyar to nominate chess grandmaster Judit Polgár as the country's president. Magyar proposed Polgár before consulting her, leading to unexpected backlash. Polgár rejected the offer on Facebook, citing lack of strength to unite a divided nation. Magyar admitted his mistake, taking full responsibility. Political commentators in Budapest view this as Magyar's first major misstep since taking office in May. The incident highlights tensions stemming from 16 years of Viktor Orbán's populist rule, with both left and right factions criticizing Polgár for different reasons.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the failure as a significant political misstep by Magyar, emphasizing the controversy and criticism from various political groups. While it presents both left and right criticisms, the narrative leans toward highlighting the broader societal divisions and the impact of Orbán's era
Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information about the nomination of Judit Polgár, her rejection, and Magyar’s admission of fault. These details match the cross-source consensus and are well supported by the narrative presented in other articles.
Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'enttäuschung und fiasko' and frames the event as a significant failure for Magyar. This introduces a more negative tone compared to other reports, making it less objective.
Der StandardIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7511 days ago Magyar's failure is not a disaster, but a warning signThe article discusses the failed attempt by Hungary’s new Prime Minister Péter Magyar to nominate chess grandmaster Judit Polgár for the position of State President, which was rejected by Polgár. While this incident is described as a setback rather than a catastrophe, it is framed as a warning signal regarding Magyar’s leadership style. The piece criticizes his rushed decision-making and lack of communication, suggesting these traits could undermine his reform efforts. It contrasts Magyar’s approach with that of former leader Viktor Orbán, who was accused of self-aggrandizement and undermining the rule of law. The author implies that this misstep might ultimately lead to greater political stability if it makes Magyar more cautious.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Péter Magyar’s actions as overly ambitious and poorly communicated, using language like 'toxische Mischung' (toxic mix) and comparing him unfavorably to Viktor Orbán, who is portrayed negatively as a self-serving leader. This critique aligns with left-leaning perspectives that are
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the situation where Péter Magyar proposed Judit Polgár as a candidate for president but she declined. It also mentions that Magyar’s party has a two-thirds majority and would likely choose someone else. The facts align with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the event with some subjective commentary, such as calling Magyar’s actions 'strategically unwise' and 'toxic.' While it provides a balanced view by noting that not much had changed politically, the tone leans slightly critical of Magyar.
KurierParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 8513 days agoUngarischer Premierminister Péter Magyar kündigte an, die Schach-Olympiasiegerin Judit Polgár um die Nachfolge von Staatspräsident Tamás Sulyok im Amt des ungarischen Präsidenten zu bitten. Magyar betonte auf social media die Verdienste von Polgár, die als 'Königin des Schachs' bekannt ist und seit Jahrzehnten für Talent und Beharrlichkeit steht. Das ungarische Parlament hat 30 Tage Zeit, einen neuen Präsidenten zu wählen, wobei bis dahin die Parlamentspräsidentin Ágnes Forsthoffer interimistisch die Geschäfte leiten wird. Die Entscheidung wird während einer außerordentlichen Parlamentssitzung am Montag getroffen.
Bias read (Center): Die Berichterstattung konzentriert sich auf die faktischen Informationen zur Nominierung von Judit Polgár als möglicher Präsidentin Ungarns. Es gibt keine offensichtliche parteipolitische Einflussnahme oder Verzerrung. Die Quelle bleibt neutral und berichtet objektiv über den Vorschlag des Premiers,
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports that Magyar proposed Judit Polgár for the presidency after the removal of Tamás Sulyok. However, it lacks specific details about Polgár’s response and does not mention the controversy surrounding the nomination, which is covered in other sources.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely neutral in tone, focusing on the facts of the nomination and the timeline for selecting a new president. It avoids taking sides or using emotionally charged language.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Austria
