A reactionary and Trumpist wave rules Latin America: vassals dressed as ultras
The article discusses the rise of far-right leaders in Latin America, focusing on Abelardo de la Espriella, who recently won the Colombian presidency with promises of significant state cuts, an end to peace negotiations with armed groups, a return to military hardline policies, and the construction of new large prisons modeled after El Salvador's president Nayib Bukele. De la Espriella has also suggested leaving international organizations like the UN and OEA, which he criticizes as leftist-dominated. The article highlights his lavish lifestyle and overtly misogynistic views, as well as his threats against political opponents and journalists. It notes that this victory is part of a broader trend where far-right and right-wing governments are increasingly dominating the region, with only a few progressive strongholds remaining such as Mexico, Brazil, and Uruguay. Experts like Anna Ayuso from CIDOB and José Antonio Sanahuja discuss the emergence of 'neo-patriotic' right movements characterized by their opposition to international institutions, emphasis on national security, and alignment with figures like Donald Trump.
In the wake of one of the most tightly contested presidential elections in recent Colombian history, Abelardo de la Espriella has emerged victorious against his leftist opponent, Iván Cepeda. The election, held on June 21, 2026, saw De la Espriella secure 49.66% of the vote, compared to Cepeda’s 48.70%, according to the preliminary count published by the National Registry of Civil Status (RNEC). This narrow margin of victory, amounting to approximately 250,830 votes, marked a significant shift in the political landscape of Colombia, which had previously seen the rise of left-wing leaders such as Gustavo Petro. De la Espriella's win was not merely a reflection of his campaign promises but also a sign of broader regional trends in Latin America where right-wing and far-right candidates have been gaining momentum.
The election results were announced amid a climate of heightened tension and polarization. De la Espriella, known for his strong rhetoric and controversial policies, had promised sweeping changes during his first 100 days in office, including over 90 decrees aimed at addressing issues ranging from security to economic reform. His victory came despite initial skepticism about his chances, especially given the support he received from former President Gustavo Petro, who had initially led the polls. However, De la Espriella managed to surpass expectations, securing more than 10 million votes in the first round and ultimately winning the second round by a slim margin.
The election outcome has sparked discussions about the future direction of Colombia under De la Espriella’s leadership. While he has pledged to govern for all Colombians and emphasized unity, his proposed policies include a significant reduction in government size, an end to peace negotiations with armed groups, and a return to a stricter military approach. These plans have raised concerns among critics who fear they could exacerbate existing tensions within the country.
As the new president-elect, De la Espriella faces the challenge of governing a nation deeply divided along ideological lines. With only four senators representing his party in a legislature of 103 seats, his ability to implement his agenda will depend heavily on alliances with other political factions. The upcoming scrutiny process will play a crucial role in determining whether the preliminary results hold up, as Cepeda has already announced intentions to contest 33,000 voting booths nationwide.
The election also highlights the growing influence of right-wing and far-right movements across Latin America. Countries such as Argentina, El Salvador, and Chile have witnessed similar shifts toward more conservative governance, often characterized by anti-establishment sentiments and a focus on national sovereignty. De la Espriella's alignment with international figures like Donald Trump underscores this trend, reflecting a broader movement towards nationalism and a rejection of perceived foreign interference in domestic affairs.
Despite the narrow margin of victory, De la Espriella has expressed confidence in his mandate, emphasizing that his administration will prioritize security, economic stability, and the rule of law. He has called for national unity and assured that there would be no reprisals or persecution, promising to govern for all Colombians. As he prepares to take office, the coming months will be critical in shaping the trajectory of his presidency and its impact on Colombia's political and social fabric.
24 reports
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 6516 days ago
The article discusses Abelardo de la Espriella, an outsider candidate who unexpectedly received over 10 million votes in the first round of Colombia's presidential elections, challenging initial predictions that the left would dominate. The piece highlights his background as a wealthy businessman from the coastal region and frames him as a 'phenomenon' in the election race.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual summary of the electoral results and introduces De la Espriella without overtly favoring any political side. It notes the unexpected nature of his success but does not frame it with ideological bias or emphasize one perspective over another.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article provides factual information about De la Espriella's performance and public perception but uses labels like 'outsider' and 'millonario' which can introduce bias.
El MundoIndependent🔒RightFactual 75Objective 6015 days ago
A hundred guerrillas surrendered their weapons in southern Colombia as part of negotiations with leftist President Gustavo Petro. This marks the first step for rebels to establish themselves in a special zone where they aim to solidify agreements with the government. The surrender represents the biggest advancement for Petro's 'total peace' policy, which aimed to negotiate with all armed groups in the country but was ultimately unsuccessful.
Bias read (Right): The article uses critical language such as 'cuestionada política de paz' (questioned peace policy), implying skepticism toward Petro's approach. It frames the surrender as a 'first step' for rebels to consolidate agreements, suggesting the policy is incomplete or flawed. The emphasis on Petro being
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article provides specific details such as the number of guerrillas (a hundred), the location (Putumayo), and the group involved (CNEB). However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'quema los últimos cartuchos' and frames the event as an end to a 'cuestionada política de paz,' which may in
El PaísIndependent🔒RightFactual 75Objective 6015 days ago
The article discusses the impact of Donald Trump's involvement in the Colombian presidential campaign, particularly between the far-right candidate Abelardo de la Espriella and the leftist senator Iván Cepeda. It notes that Trump's explicit support for de la Espriella has become a significant point of contention in the run-up to the election. De la Espriella, who leads in polls and prediction markets, is using this backing as a key strategy, while also accusing Cepeda's supporters of vote-buying.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Trump's support for the far-right candidate as a major advantage, emphasizing de la Espriella's use of this backing as a 'great trump card' and suggesting that Cepeda's supporters are accused of unethical behavior without providing balanced counterpoints or context from Cepeda’s阵营
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article presents facts about Trump's influence in Colombian elections and mentions support for De la Espriella but uses emotionally charged terms like 'ultraderechista' and 'intimidar' which may affect objectivity.
The article discusses the rise of far-right leaders in Latin America, focusing on Abelardo de la Espriella, who recently won the Colombian presidency with promises of significant state cuts, an end to peace negotiations with armed groups, a return to military hardline policies, and the construction of new large prisons modeled after El Salvador's president Nayib Bukele. De la Espriella has also suggested leaving international organizations like the UN and OEA, which he criticizes as leftist-dominated. The article highlights his lavish lifestyle and overtly misogynistic views, as well as his threats against political opponents and journalists. It notes that this victory is part of a broader trend where far-right and right-wing governments are increasingly dominating the region, with only a few progressive strongholds remaining such as Mexico, Brazil, and Uruguay. Experts like Anna Ayuso from CIDOB and José Antonio Sanahuja discuss the emergence of 'neo-patriotic' right movements characterized by their opposition to international institutions, emphasis on national security, and alignment with figures like Donald Trump.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the rise of far-right leaders in Latin America as a reactionary and Trumpist movement, using terms like 'ultra-right,' 'reactionary,' and 'submissive.' It emphasizes the negative implications of these leaders' policies, including their rejection of international cooperation and 'b
Abelardo de la Espriella, a candidate from the far-right, has won Colombia's presidential election in the second round with a narrow margin of approximately 250,000 votes (49.7%) over his leftist opponent, Iván Cepeda (48.7%). De la Espriella, known as 'El Tigre,' ran on an anti-establishment platform emphasizing law and order and religious values, drawing comparisons to similar figures in other Latin American countries. Despite his victory, he called for national unity and promised to govern for all Colombians, rejecting retaliation against opponents. However, Cepeda has refused to accept the preliminary results, announcing plans to challenge the outcome in 33,000 polling stations nationwide. The leftist coalition, led by outgoing President Gustavo Petro, remains divided, with calls for calm amid concerns over potential unrest.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the election as a significant shift toward far-right power, using terms like 'extrema derecha' (far-right) repeatedly and highlighting De la Espriella’s anti-system rhetoric. It emphasizes his victory while portraying the leftist opposition as divided and questioning the results,
Abelardo de la Espriella has been elected as the new president of Colombia, but his narrow victory—winning by less than 1%, or 240,000 votes—presents significant challenges for governance. The article highlights that while Espriella secured the presidency, his ability to govern effectively will depend on his capacity to move beyond campaign promises and develop a concrete policy agenda. With the country deeply divided politically, Espriella faces the task of uniting a nation with stark ideological differences. His leadership will be tested as he prepares to take office in August 2026 for a four-year term.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral assessment of the election outcome and the challenges ahead for the newly elected president. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. Instead, it focuses on the practical implications of a narrow victory and the need for a new
Abelardo de la Espriella, an ultranationalist candidate, has been elected president of Colombia with 49.66% of the vote, narrowly defeating leftist senator Iván Cepeda, who received 48.70%. De la Espriella has pledged to implement over 90 decrees within his first 100 days in office, starting August 7, focusing on security, economic policies, health, and education. However, his slim victory raises questions about the legitimacy of implementing major reforms without congressional approval. In his first speech, he acknowledged the challenges facing the country, describing it as divided and in need of reconstruction, emphasizing that recovery would require effort, sacrifice, discipline, and perseverance. During an interview, he reiterated his plans to address what he called a 'real disaster' through these decrees.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the election results and De la Espriella’s promises neutrally, acknowledging the political divide and the potential limitations of his authority. It includes direct quotes from the candidate and mentions the opposition’s stance without overtly favoring either side. The tone
Colombia has experienced one of the closest presidential elections in recent history, with the far-right candidate Abelardo De la Espriella narrowly defeating the progressive Iván Cepeda by approximately 250,830 votes according to the preliminary count published by the electoral authority. The count, which covers 99.99% of voting stations, shows De la Espriella receiving 12,959,542 votes (49.66%) compared to Cepeda’s 12,708,712 votes (48.70%). While Cepeda has acknowledged the preliminary results, his campaign plans to challenge 33,000 voting booths, and President Gustavo Petro has stated he will accept the final outcome once legal verification processes are complete. The preliminary count is not legally binding and differs from the official scrutiny process, which will determine the final result after weeks of tension and questions about the electoral system.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the election results, including both candidates' positions and the procedural aspects of the preliminary count versus the official scrutiny. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The focus is on explaining
In the closest presidential election in recent Colombian history, ultranationalist candidate Abelardo De la Espriella narrowly defeated leftist candidate Iván Cepeda with less than 300,000 votes, securing 49.66% of the vote compared to Cepeda’s 48.70%. The final result depends on the official count, but preliminary results show a margin of just 0.96 percentage points. De la Espriella, representing the Defensores de la Patria movement, called for national unity and promised to govern for all Colombians, emphasizing democracy, institutional integrity, and an end to corruption. He addressed supporters in Barranquilla, stating his victory symbolizes hope and the people’s desire to reclaim national dignity. His campaign focused on security, anti-corruption, and rebuilding the nation.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the election outcome, quoting both candidates’ positions and focusing on the procedural aspects of the vote. It does not favor either side ideologically, presenting De la Espriella’s promises and rhetoric without overtly positive or negative commentary. The
Abelardo de la Espriella, un político de extrema derecha y admirador de figuras como Donald Trump y Javier Milei, fue elegido presidente de Colombia en una elección muy disputada, obteniendo un ligero margen sobre el candidato izquierdista Iván Cepeda. El triunfo de De la Espriella, quien no tiene experiencia política previa, se debió en parte a los votos en blanco, que superaron la diferencia entre ambos candidatos. Su gobierno enfrentará desafíos significativos debido a la falta de mayoría parlamentaria y la necesidad de negociar con otros partidos. Analistas comparan su estilo con políticos del pasado, destacando su postura conservadora y su enfoque en temas como la seguridad y la economía. El presidente saliente, Gustavo Petro, expresó preocupación por la estrechez de la victoria.
Bias read (Right): The article frames De la Espriella’s victory as a 'radical political shift' toward extreme right-wing governance, highlights his admiration for figures like Trump and Milei, and draws comparisons to historically conservative leaders with repressive policies. The tone emphasizes the potential risks,
The narrow victory of far-right candidate Abelardo De la Espriella over leftist senator Iván Cepeda in Colombia's runoff election, with a 0.96% margin, marks the closest second-round result in recent history. With 99.9% of ballots counted, De la Espriella received 49.66% of the vote, while Cepeda secured 48.70%. President Gustavo Petro urged patience until the final results are confirmed, emphasizing the need for calm among citizens. De la Espriella celebrated his preliminary win on social media, while Cepeda acknowledged the early results but stated they were not binding and announced plans to challenge 33,000 out of 122,020 voting stations nationwide and abroad. The low voter turnout, with nearly 677,000 votes going to blank or null ballots, highlights widespread dissatisfaction with both candidates.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and quotes from multiple parties involved, including the president, the winning candidate, and the losing candidate. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The focus is on the close
Colombia's 2026 presidential election results show Abelardo de la Espriella, an ultra-right lawyer, winning with 49.65% of the vote, narrowly defeating leftist senator Iván Cepeda, who received 48.71%. The victory margin was less than 250,000 votes, marking the closest result in recent history. While de la Espriella celebrated his win on social media, Cepeda acknowledged the preliminary count but stated it is not binding and announced plans to challenge 33,000 polling stations nationwide. Current President Gustavo Petro urged patience until the final tally. The election day passed peacefully despite over 2,600 reported electoral complaints. De la Espriella emphasized unity and inclusivity in his vision for Colombia, while Cepeda pledged to govern for all citizens if he eventually wins.
Bias read (Right): The article emphasizes the narrow victory of Abelardo de la Espriella, an ultra-right candidate, and highlights his celebratory statements and inclusive rhetoric. It provides more detailed quotes and focus on de la Espriella’s claims compared to Cepeda’s challenges, which are mentioned briefly. The
Colombia has concluded its most contested election in history, with the far-right candidate Abelardo De la Espriella projected to win against leftist candidate Iván Cepeda based on preliminary vote counts. According to the pre-count, De la Espriella received 49.66% of the votes compared to Cepeda’s 48.7%, a margin of approximately 250,000 ballots. While Cepeda acknowledged the preliminary results, he stated he would not recognize the outcome until the final count and has challenged 27% of the voting tables. President Gustavo Petro emphasized that no one could yet claim victory. The narrow margin suggests a likely victory for De la Espriella, who would become president of the fourth-largest economy in Latin America. This result leaves De la Espriella in a difficult position, as he expected a larger mandate to reflect a significant ideological shift but now faces a deeply divided country. The election saw record voter turnout at 63%, with over 676,000 blank or null votes, highlighting the polarization within the nation.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the election as a decisive victory for the far-right candidate, emphasizing his projected win and the support he has received from across the political spectrum and international ultraright leaders like Donald Trump. It highlights the narrow margin of victory and the implications,
In Colombia, outgoing President Gustavo Petro has expressed doubts about the preliminary election results for the presidential race, which were released by the National Civil Registry. Petro stated that no candidate can yet be declared president and urged calm among citizens. This comes amid concerns over the credibility of the electoral process, with Petro being a key political figure behind the leftist senator Iván Cepeda’s candidacy. The situation highlights potential tensions surrounding the legitimacy of the election outcomes.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the situation through the perspective of the outgoing leftist president, who challenges the preliminary election results. The emphasis on his role as a political leader backing a leftist candidate, combined with his rejection of the quick count, suggests a narrative aligned with a
According to preliminary counts, Abelardo de la Espriella, a right-wing candidate and political outsider, has won Colombia's presidential election with 49.7% of the vote, narrowly defeating Iván Cepeda of the leftist Pacto Histórico (PH) who received 48.7%. The results come amid heightened tensions, with concerns over potential violence if the right wins. De la Espriella, an independent lawyer with little prior political experience, faces strong opposition from leftist groups and criminal organizations that supported Cepeda. President Gustavo Petro, representing the PH, has refused to accept the preliminary results, alleging fraud and vowing to challenge them legally. Petro has suggested his supporters might take to the streets if Cepeda is not officially declared the winner, raising fears of unrest.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the victory of a right-wing outsider as a significant shift in Colombian politics, emphasizing the threat of violence from leftist groups and criminal organizations that backed the losing candidate. It highlights the narrow margin of victory and portrays the opposition's refusal
According to the preliminary official count, Abelardo de la Espriella, an ultra-right candidate, has been declared the winner of the Colombian presidential election. This development marks a significant shift in Colombia's political landscape, with de la Espriella representing a more conservative and hardline approach compared to previous administrations. His victory could have major implications for policies related to security, economic reform, and relations with neighboring countries. The results are based on initial data from electoral authorities, though final confirmation may take time as all votes are counted.
Bias read (Right): The article refers to De la Espriella as 'ultraderechista,' which indicates a clear ideological framing aligned with far-right politics. The headline emphasizes his designation as president according to the preliminary count, suggesting a positive outlook toward his potential leadership. The term 'n
Colombia held the second round of its presidential election on Sunday, with voters choosing between ultraright candidate Abelardo de la Espriella and leftist candidate Iván Cepeda, the successor to current President Gustavo Petro. De la Espriella, leading in polls, voted in Barranquilla wearing a Colombian football jersey and a tricolor ribbon, surrounded by supporters chanting his campaign slogan 'Firme por la patria.' He emphasized defeating 'tyranny' and called on Colombians to support his vision for the country. Cepeda, representing the ruling Pacto Histórico coalition, voted in Bogotá amid chants from his supporters. Petro, after voting, stated he would leave office on August 7 regardless of the outcome, rejecting claims of him being a dictator and emphasizing his commitment to democratic principles. The election opening ceremony in Bogotá included Petro, electoral authorities, and other officials urging peaceful voting and respect for results.
Bias read (Center): The article provides balanced coverage of both candidates, presenting their actions, statements, and campaign contexts without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both De la Espriella and Cepeda, as well as Petro’s remarks, offering a neutral portrayal of the election event.
The number of Colombian voters registered in Madrid has increased compared to the first round of the presidential election. This suggests a growing diaspora community or higher voter participation among Colombians living in Spain. The increase could reflect greater political engagement or changes in registration processes. Such trends may impact the overall electoral dynamics for Colombian expatriates.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual observation about voter numbers without taking a stance on the implications or framing the data in a particular ideological light. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorial commentary that would indicate a clear lean.
The article discusses the Colombian presidential election, focusing on Abelardo de La Espriella, an ultra-right candidate who is leading in the second round against Iván Cepeda. De La Espriella has made hostile remarks toward leftist groups and is known for his connections to paramilitary and drug trafficking circles. The article highlights the violent history against leftist movements in Colombia, including the killing of over 6,000 members of the Unión Patriótica, a leftist political party, with Cepeda’s father being among the victims.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Abelardo de La Espriella as a strong contender and emphasizes his hostility toward leftist groups, while referencing historical violence against leftists in Colombia. It uses terms like 'enemigo acérrimo' (acrimonious enemy), which suggests a biased portrayal of the opposition. It
Iván Cepeda, a leftist presidential candidate in Colombia, gave an interview to El País discussing his views on applying policies from other Latin American leaders such as Javier Milei’s economic reforms or Nayib Bukele’s approach to security. The interview took place between two influencers, with Cepeda speaking from his car while traveling between appointments. His main argument was that directly implementing these policies in Colombia would be risky due to the country's unique circumstances. Cepeda's rival, Abelardo de la Espriella, has refused to give an interview to the newspaper.
Bias read (Left): The article discusses a leftist presidential candidate criticizing the policies of other leaders, which frames the discussion around progressive governance and caution against adopting more radical approaches. The framing emphasizes the risks of adopting far-right or authoritarian-style policies, a左
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Spain
