A high-ranking official within Argentina's government has come forward with allegations that she lent her credit card to former Chief of Cabinet Manuel Adorni to make purchases, including a gaming monitor valued at over 2.1 million Argentine pesos. The revelation emerged during an ongoing investigation led by prosecutor Gerardo Pollicita, who is examining whether Adorni used colleagues' credit cards to obscure personal expenses from being directly linked to his name. This case has drawn significant attention as it potentially implicates broader patterns of financial mismanagement within the administration.
Laura Schiuma, director general of Presidential Activities under the Secretariat of Communication, reportedly told investigators that she allowed Adorni to use her credit card to purchase a gaming monitor on August 19, 2025, through Mercado Libre for approximately 2,184,999.05 pesos. According to her testimony, Adorni later repaid her the amount in cash. This specific transaction was part of a larger set of purchases made using other officials' credit cards, which investigators believe were intended to mask Adorni’s spending habits from public scrutiny.
The investigation also includes other similar transactions. For instance, two projectors priced at around 1.831,795 pesos each were purchased using a credit card held by another government employee, Luis Enrique Aluju. These items were bought during the same timeframe and appear to follow the same pattern of using others' credit cards to avoid direct attribution to Adorni. Additionally, there is evidence pointing to a separate purchase involving Gisela Kocsis, another government worker, who allegedly spent 8,183,383 pesos in cash on bedding and white goods meant for Adorni’s home in the Indio Cua country estate.
This property had been acquired by Adorni towards the end of 2024, and the associated renovation costs have become a point of contention in the investigation. A contractor named Matías Tabar, responsible for these renovations, reportedly received payments totaling 245,929 dollars in cash. Evidence related to this payment was found on Tabar’s mobile phone, which remains under forensic analysis by prosecutors. Furthermore, messages exchanged between Adorni and Tabar suggest attempts to coordinate their testimonies, although Tabar’s account ultimately complicated Adorni’s position.
The scope of the investigation extends beyond just these transactions. It involves reviewing multiple financial records and communications that could indicate a systematic effort to conceal expenditures. Prosecutors are particularly interested in understanding how such practices might have been coordinated among various individuals within the government structure. The implications of these findings could be far-reaching, especially considering the potential impact on transparency and accountability within governmental operations.
Reactions to these developments have varied. Some critics argue that such actions undermine democratic principles by obscuring financial dealings that should be transparent to the public. Others remain cautious, emphasizing the need for thorough legal proceedings before drawing conclusions about the extent of any wrongdoing. As the investigation continues, further details may emerge regarding the full breadth of activities under scrutiny and the roles played by all parties involved. The outcome of this probe will likely influence future discussions about governance standards and ethical conduct in public office.
3 reports
InfobaeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days agoA female official from the Spokesperson's Office confirmed that she lent her credit card to Manuel Adorni to make purchases. The statement was made by an employee of the office, indicating that Adorni used the card for shopping purposes. This disclosure raises questions about potential misuse of official resources or personal financial entanglements involving public figures. The situation could be seen as a conflict of interest if Adorni is associated with any governmental or institutional role. However, the nature of the purchases and whether they were related to official duties remain unclear.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement from an official without apparent bias or loaded language. It does not take a stance on the implications of the action, nor does it provide additional context or commentary that would indicate a particular ideological leaning.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Same as article 1, factuality is high due to confirmation from a functionary, objectivity is similarly good but slightly tilted by the repetition and focus on the credit card lending.
InfobaeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days ago A Vocería official confirmed that she lent her credit card to Manuel Adorni to make purchasesA female official from the Spokesperson's Office confirmed that she lent her credit card to Manuel Adorni to make purchases. The statement was made by an employee of the office, indicating that Adorni used the card for shopping purposes. This disclosure raises questions about potential misuse of official resources or personal financial entanglements involving public figures. The situation could be seen as a conflict of interest if Adorni is associated with any governmental or institutional role. However, the nature of the purchases and whether they were related to official duties remain unclear.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement from an official without apparent bias or loaded language. It does not take a stance on the implications of the action, nor does it provide additional context or commentary that would indicate a particular ideological leaning.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is high as it reports a confirmed action from a functionary, aligning with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is good but slightly tilted by the emphasis on the act of lending a credit card for purchases.
ClarínIndependentRightFactual 75Objective 602 days agoThe article reports that Adorni, likely referring to a public official or politician, spent over 139 million pesos in just two and a half years using credit card payments alone. This amount exceeds his total salary during that period. The focus is on the significant discrepancy between his spending and income, raising questions about financial transparency and accountability. The report highlights concerns about potential misuse of public funds or personal extravagance, though it does not provide specific details about the nature of the expenditures or any formal investigation into the matter.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the issue as a scandal involving excessive spending by a public figure, which aligns with conservative narratives that often criticize perceived wastefulness or corruption among politicians. The emphasis on the large sum spent compared to his salary suggests a moral judgment about
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): Factuality is moderate as the claim about spending over 139 million pesos is reported without a primary source, but aligns with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is lower due to the sensational tone suggesting excessive spending without contextual balance.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
AR
