One pub closes every day in the UK, the Prime Minister gives them a thumbs up.
The new UK Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, has announced a 20% reduction in the business rate tax for pubs, nightclubs, and concert venues in England, aiming to support these struggling businesses. This is the third measure introduced by Burnham within three days, following the removal of VAT on household electricity during winter and the reintroduction of a £2 cap on bus fares. The tax cut is expected to save around 32,000 businesses approximately £1,100 annually but will not apply to larger concert venues. The government plans to fund this initiative through tax revisions targeting businesses deemed to contribute negatively to the economy, such as e-cigarette shops. However, industry representatives argue that the measure is insufficient, emphasizing the need for deeper reforms to the business rates system. Meanwhile, 120 wealthy individuals, including celebrities like Gary Lineker, have called for higher taxes on high-income earners, suggesting this could generate up to £24 billion.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Andy Burnham has been confirmed as the new Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, succeeding Keir Starmer who resigned after two years in office. Burnham, the leader of the Labour Party, formally took office after meeting King Charles III at Buckingham Palace. Starmer expressed pride in his tenure, noting the country's strength under his leadership. Burnham faces significant challenges including economic stagnation, high living costs, immigration issues, and growing support for Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. He plans to address these concerns by implementing measures to alleviate financial pressures on families and restoring public trust in governance. Burnham is set to announce his cabinet and outline his policy agenda soon.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of Burnham's appointment and the challenges he faces, without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It includes quotes from both Burnham and his predecessor, Starmer, and outlines the political landscape without taking a clear ideological stance
Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes Andy Burnham as the new UK Prime Minister, mentions his previous role as mayor of Greater Manchester, and states that he succeeded Keir Starmer. It also notes the challenges he faces, such as economic issues and migration, which are consistent with general knowledge
Why objectivity (90): The article remains largely objective, presenting facts about Burnham's background and the challenges ahead without overtly favoring one political viewpoint. However, it uses some descriptive language like 'new approach,' which could imply a slight positive framing of Burnham's policies.
Le FigaroIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 904 days ago
The outgoing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer delivered his final speech at 10 Downing Street before stepping down and passing leadership to Andy Burnham, the new Labour Party leader. In his remarks, Starmer claimed that the UK is 'stronger and more just' than when he first took office two years ago, expressing pride in the progress made during his tenure. The transition marks the end of Starmer’s leadership and the beginning of Burnham’s term as the new prime minister.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral account of Starmer's farewell speech and the leadership transition within the Labour Party. It focuses on factual statements from Starmer without overtly positive or negative framing. While the content is politically charged due to the nature of the subject (leadership
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Keir Starmer has resigned as UK Prime Minister and that Andy Burnham will take over. It includes direct quotes from Starmer stating that the UK is 'stronger and fairer' than when he took office, which is consistent with the broader narrative of political transitio
Why objectivity (90): The article is mostly neutral in tone, presenting the events objectively. However, it uses phrases like 'with a smile' and 'proud of everything we have achieved,' which could subtly frame Starmer's departure in a more positive light.
France 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 954 days ago
The article appears to reference a hypothetical scenario in which Andy Burnham, the leader of the Labour Party, is named Prime Minister of the United Kingdom by King Charles III. The content is presented as a video clip, but the actual article text provided does not contain any substantive information beyond a cover image and metadata. There is no detailed explanation of the circumstances leading to Burnham’s appointment, nor any discussion of political implications or reactions. The piece seems to be a placeholder or incomplete report.
Bias read (Center): The article does not provide enough content to determine a clear ideological leaning. It merely references a potential political development without offering commentary, analysis, or framing that would suggest a particular perspective. As such, the coverage remains balanced and non-partisan.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports that Andy Burnham has been named UK Prime Minister and quotes him saying 'that is our challenge: to make politics work.' It references King Charles III welcoming him at Buckingham Palace, aligning with the primary source document's implied context of a transition of po
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the event in a neutral manner, focusing on factual statements made by Burnham and providing background on the transition of power. It avoids overtly biased language and maintains a balanced perspective.
France 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 954 days ago
The article references a video that discusses the transition of leadership within the UK Labour Party as Keir Starmer prepares to step down. It highlights the challenges faced by his successor, describing the task ahead as 'colossal.' The video includes imagery related to the topic and is attributed to Reuters photographer Isabel Infantes. However, due to technical issues, the video cannot be displayed without enabling certain browser settings or disabling ad-blocking extensions.
Bias read (Center): The article does not present a clear ideological slant. While it acknowledges the significant challenge facing Starmer's successor, it does not frame the narrative in a distinctly left or right-leaning manner. The focus remains on the political transition and the magnitude of the task, without overt
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports that Keir Starmer has stepped down as UK Prime Minister and that his successor, Andy Burnham, faces significant challenges. It references Starmer's statement that the country is 'stronger and fairer' than when he took office, which aligns with the broader narrative of
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, focusing on factual reporting of the transition of power and the challenges facing the new Prime Minister. It avoids taking sides or using emotionally charged language.
BFM TVIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago
One month after resigning from Keir Starmer's government, former Defense Minister John Healey has been appointed Chancellor by the new British Prime Minister. The article reports on Healey's transition from defense minister to finance minister, highlighting his new role in the government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update on a political appointment without overtly favoring any particular ideological stance. It focuses on the procedural change within the UK government rather than taking a partisan position.
Why factuality (90): This article closely follows the primary source, confirming Burnham's appointment by King Charles III and his visit to Buckingham Palace. It includes relevant details such as Burnham's age, his wife, and the timeline of events. The only minor discrepancy is the mention of Burnham's first speech at D
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the events objectively without injecting personal opinions or emotional language.
Le FigaroIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago
The article reports on Andy Burnham being appointed as the new Prime Minister of the United Kingdom by King Charles III, who tasked him with forming a government. Burnham succeeded Keir Starmer, who resigned after facing criticism and electoral setbacks. The transition took place at Buckingham Palace and later at 10 Downing Street, where Burnham delivered his first speech as prime minister, outlining plans to restore public confidence and address the cost-of-living crisis.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral account of the political transition, focusing on factual events such as the appointment of Andy Burnham as PM and the resignation of Keir Starmer. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or emphasis on particular ideological perspectives. It simply rel
Why factuality (90): The article confirms that Andy Burnham has become the seventh UK Prime Minister in ten years, matching the information in the primary source document. It accurately reports the political transition and Burnham’s appointment.
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, presenting the facts about Burnham’s rise to power without introducing subjective interpretations or emotional language.
MediapartIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago
The article reports that Andy Burnham has taken over from Keir Starmer at Downing Street. This suggests a leadership change within the UK government, likely indicating a shift in roles or responsibilities among senior officials. The transition implies that Burnham is now assuming a prominent position previously held by Starmer, which could have significant implications for current policies or initiatives. However, the exact nature of their roles and the specific changes in governance are not detailed in the provided text.
Bias read (Center): The article simply states a leadership change without any apparent bias in language, sourcing, or emphasis. It does not provide enough information to determine a clear ideological leaning.
Why factuality (90): This article provides comprehensive details about Andy Burnham's appointment, including his background, the transition process, and the political context. It aligns closely with the primary source document and includes accurate historical and political information.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both Burnham's background and the reasons for Starmer's resignation without taking sides. It avoids emotionally charged language and sticks to factual reporting.
Le FigaroIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
Andy Burnham, former mayor of Greater Manchester and a member of the Labour Party, has become the new leader of the party after ousting Keir Starmer in a leadership contest described as a 'bloodless coup.' Burnham, who previously ran for the Labour leadership in 2010 and 2015, now stands to become the next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. His election was overwhelming, receiving support from 379 out of 403 Labour MPs, highlighting his popularity within the party. This marks a significant shift in British politics, with Burnham positioned to take over Downing Street.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Andy Burnham as a leftist figure, emphasizing his progressive background and his victory over Keir Starmer, who is generally seen as more centrist. The narrative highlights Burnham’s rise as a 'left-wing' alternative, suggesting a shift toward more radical policies under his领导.
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed biographical information about Andy Burnham and his rise to power within the Labour Party. It accurately notes that he became the 59th UK Prime Minister and mentions the 379 out of 403 parliamentary votes he received. However, it is behind a paywall, so only partial inf
Why objectivity (80): The article is generally neutral in tone, though it frames Burnham's election as a 'dream come true' and refers to his ascension as a 'coup d'état without bloodshed,' which could be seen as slightly subjective phrasing.
France 24 (Français)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
The article features a video from France 24 discussing Andy Burnham, a British politician, who has set a clear leftward direction. The content includes a YouTube video which requires enabling audience measurement and advertising cookies to display. There is a note indicating that a browser extension might be blocking the video player, suggesting users disable or remove it to view the content. The article does not provide additional details beyond this setup.
Bias read (Progressive): The headline positions Andy Burnham as setting a 'clearly leftward direction,' implying a progressive or leftist stance. This framing suggests a left-leaning perspective, aligning with the narrative that Burnham is moving towards more radical or socialist policies.
Why factuality (85): The article mentions that Andy Burnham 'has set a resolutely leftward course,' which may reflect a political interpretation rather than a neutral statement. This could introduce some subjectivity compared to more neutral descriptions.
Why objectivity (80): The phrase 'resolument à gauche' introduces a political leaning, which may be seen as slightly biased depending on the reader's perspective. It frames his leadership in a particular ideological light.
France 24 (Français)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
The article features a video from France 24 discussing UK politics, specifically mentioning Andy Burnham preparing to succeed Keir Starmer. The content appears to focus on potential leadership changes within the Labour Party. However, due to technical issues with the embedded YouTube video, the content cannot be viewed directly. The article includes an image credit from France 24 but lacks specific details about the content of the video.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about potential leadership changes within the UK Labour Party without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It does not provide explicit commentary or opinion on the matter, maintaining a neutral tone.
Why factuality (85): This article provides detailed information about Andy Burnham's election as Labour leader, including his speech, the support he received, and the context of his leadership transition. It accurately reflects the primary source document and includes quotes from officials, enhancing its factual reliabi
Why objectivity (80): The article presents information objectively, using quotes and factual descriptions without introducing personal opinions or emotional language.
France 24 (Français)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
Andy Burnham, former mayor of Greater Manchester and a prominent political figure in the UK, has been elected leader of the Labour Party during an extraordinary congress in London. He is set to become the next Prime Minister, succeeding the resigning Keir Starmer, who stepped down in June after losing the general election in 2024. Burnham received support from approximately 95% of Labour MPs and eight out of eleven affiliated trade unions. As the majority party in Parliament, the Labour leader automatically becomes Prime Minister without the need for new elections. Burnham aims to 'restore hope' to the British people, emphasizing unity and addressing long-standing issues. His leadership comes at a time when Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, leads opinion polls, and Labour hopes Burnham can counter the anti-immigration party in the upcoming 2029 general election.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the election of Andy Burnham as Labour leader and his impending role as Prime Minister in a neutral tone, focusing on factual details such as the vote results, the context of Keir Starmer’s resignation, and the political landscape. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided
Why factuality (85): The English article provides comprehensive details about Andy Burnham's election as Labour leader, including his nickname, his background, and his plans for governance. It aligns closely with the primary source document and includes quotes and contextual information, supporting its factual accuracy.
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on Burnham's leadership and policy goals without expressing personal opinions or emotional language.
BFM TVIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 754 days ago
The article introduces Andy Burnham, who is being considered as the successor to Keir Starmer as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Burnham is referred to as 'the King of the North' and described as very popular. The piece focuses on his potential role in British politics, highlighting his reputation and popularity ahead of his possible appointment.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about Andy Burnham's potential leadership role without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It emphasizes his popularity and title without taking a clear ideological position, maintaining a balanced approach.
Why factuality (85): The article provides basic information about Andy Burnham and his succession to Keir Starmer as Prime Minister, aligning with the primary source document. It mentions his nickname and popularity but lacks specific details about his policies or background beyond what is generally known. The factual c
Why objectivity (75): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards promotional language ('very popular', 'king of the north'), suggesting some level of enthusiasm or bias toward Burnham's leadership. The article does not present opposing viewpoints.
France 24 (Français)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 754 days ago
The article reports on the appointment of Andy Burnham as the new Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, replacing Keir Starmer. Burnham, who previously served as mayor of Greater Manchester, was elected leader of the Labour Party after receiving support from approximately 95% of its MPs. His appointment comes amid political challenges, including economic stagnation, high living costs, and rising popularity of the far-right Reform UK party. The transition follows Starmer’s resignation due to declining popularity within his party and public discontent. Burnham faces significant challenges, including forming a government with limited fiscal flexibility and addressing the growing threat from Reform UK ahead of the 2029 legislative elections.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the political transition, focusing on factual developments such as Burnham's election, Starmer's resignation, and the challenges facing the new government. It does not overtly favor any particular ideological stance but provides context about the political
Why factuality (85): The article gives a detailed account of Andy Burnham's ascension to Prime Minister, including his background and promises. It aligns with the primary source document and provides additional context about his leadership style and political ambitions.
Why objectivity (75): While the article is informative, it uses more emotive language such as 'sacre' (coronation) and 'changement le plus significatif' (most significant change), which could suggest a slight bias toward Burnham's leadership.
Le MondeIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 853 days ago
Andy Burnham, l'ancien maire du Grand Manchester, a été nommé Premier ministre du Royaume-Uni, prenant la succession de Keir Starmer. Il est le septième Premier ministre britannique depuis 2016. L'article mentionne également les nominations d'autres figures politiques : John Healey est désigné comme chancelier de l'Echiquier et Ed Miliband devient ministre des Affaires étrangères.
Bias read (Center): L'article présente une série de nominations politiques sans aucun biais évident ou angle particulier. Les informations sont données de manière neutre, avec un focus sur les faits et les postes occupés, sans critique ou éloges marquants. La couverture est factuelle et équilibrée.
Why factuality (80): The article correctly identifies Burnham as the new PM and notes his appointment as the seventh PM in ten years. It also mentions John Healey as Chancellor of the Exchequer and Ed Miliband as Foreign Secretary, aligning with the primary source. However, it omits some details about the transition pro
Why objectivity (85): The article presents information in a straightforward manner, avoiding emotional or biased language. It provides clear facts without apparent spin.
France 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 804 days ago
The article mentions Andy Burnham, who has been confirmed as the new leader of the Labour Party and future Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. It notes that his first speech will focus on the UK's cost-of-living crisis. The content appears to be a news snippet related to British politics, though the main body of the article is not accessible due to technical issues with video playback.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about Andy Burnham's role and potential policies without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It focuses on the announcement of his leadership and the anticipated theme of his first speech, which is a standard political development without clear slanted措
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports that Andy Burnham is expected to address the cost-of-living issue in his first speech, which aligns with the primary source document. It provides relevant context about his role and expectations, maintaining factual consistency.
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on Burnham's priorities without injecting personal opinion or emotional language. It presents the information objectively.
MediapartIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 75Objective 8010 days ago
The article states that Andy Burnham is assured of becoming the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. However, this claim appears to be speculative or based on unverified information, as there is no official confirmation or credible source provided within the text. The headline suggests a definitive outcome, but without further context or evidence, the assertion remains uncertain.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the potential appointment of Andy Burnham, a Labour Party politician, as Prime Minister, which aligns with left-leaning political narratives. While the framing does not overtly favor one side over another, the focus on a Labour leader implies a leftward leaning perspective, as a
Why factuality (75): The French article reports that Andy Burnham has moved into Downing Street and promises social measures. This aligns with the primary source document, which mentions his succession to Starmer. The inclusion of his promises adds relevant context and supports factual accuracy.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on Burnham's actions and promises without expressing personal opinions or emotional language.
France 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 707 days ago
The article discusses Andy Burnham, a UK politician running for leadership, and his approach to engaging with the public through social media platforms. It mentions that Burnham is set to become the next prime minister after Sir Keir Starmer's final session in Parliament. The piece highlights Burnham's efforts to connect with people beyond traditional political circles, including his participation in online Q&A sessions. It also introduces Jon Culshaw, a well-known comedian and impressionist, who is featured as a guest to provide insight into Burnham's persona.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about Andy Burnham's political strategy and public engagement without overtly favoring one side over another. While it acknowledges Burnham's efforts to reach out to the public, it does not take a clear stance on his policies or effectiveness, maintaining a balanced,
Why factuality (75): The article discusses Andy Burnham's left-leaning stance and political direction, aligning with the primary source document. It provides context about his political philosophy and potential impact on the UK's future.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat biased toward Burnham's progressive agenda, using phrases like 'cap résolument à gauche' (firmly leftist direction), which suggests a preference for his left-leaning approach.
Le FigaroIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 654 days ago
The article discusses Andy Burnham's ascension to the leadership of the UK Labour Party and his impending role as Prime Minister. After easily taking the lead within the party, Burnham, formerly the mayor of Manchester, is set to enter Downing Street by Monday. He has promised significant political change, stating it would be the most substantial shift in British politics since 1980. His election was largely uncontested after the forced resignation of former leader Keir Starmer, with 379 out of 403 Labour MPs supporting him. Burnham emphasized a return to the Labour Party's past values and addressed concerns about his readiness for the role.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Andy Burnham's rise to power and his promises without overtly favoring any political side. It includes direct quotes from Burnham and mentions the process of his selection, providing balanced coverage of the event.
Why factuality (75): The article briefly mentions Andy Burnham's preparations for forming his cabinet but lacks depth. It is more focused on the broader political context rather than providing specific facts about Burnham's plans or background.
Why objectivity (65): The article is more of a teaser and less of a detailed report. It does not offer a balanced perspective and focuses primarily on the political implications rather than Burnham's individual qualities.
L'ExpressIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 803 days ago
The article reports that Andy Burnham, a UK Labour Party leader, has unexpectedly chosen John Healey to manage the country's finances. This decision is described as surprising, indicating that Healey's selection was not widely anticipated. The focus is on the implications of this choice within the Labour Party leadership and its potential impact on economic policy. No further details about Healey's qualifications or specific policies are provided.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection of John Healey as a 'surprise' choice by Andy Burnham without overtly criticizing either candidate or their policies. It focuses on the event itself rather than taking a clear ideological stance. There is no strong language or emphasis that would indicate a left or
Why factuality (70): The article focuses on John Healey being chosen by Burnham to manage the country's finances but does not provide enough context about Burnham's appointment as PM. It lacks specific dates or confirmation from the primary source regarding Burnham's formal installation as PM.
Why objectivity (80): The article remains relatively neutral in tone, focusing on the selection of John Healey without overtly favoring either Burnham or Starmer. It avoids strong subjective language.
France 24 (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 70Objective 757 days ago
Andy Burnham, known as the 'King of the North,' was elected leader of the UK's Labour Party, marking the final step before he becomes the country's next prime minister. The election took place during a special conference where Burnham received strong backing from Labour MPs. He is set to replace Keir Starmer, whose unpopularity led to his removal as leader. Burnham outlined plans to shift power from London to regional areas to address inequality and counter the growing influence of Reform, a populist party led by Nigel Farage. With a general election approaching in 2029, Burnham faces the challenge of implementing long-term policies promptly.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the leadership change within the Labour Party and Burnham's policy goals without overtly favoring any political side. It includes balanced mentions of both Burnham's ambitions and the challenges posed by Reform, without using biased language or omitting
Why factuality (70): This article states that Andy Burnham is assured of becoming Prime Minister, which aligns with the primary source. However, it lacks specific details about the selection process or any official confirmation beyond what is mentioned in the primary source. The phrasing 'assured of becoming' introduces
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral, presenting the information without strong emotional language or personal opinions.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.