ON
← Back to feed
An initial report indicates that the AVE collided with the Iryo at a speed of between 160 and 200 km/h
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter

An initial report indicates that the AVE collided with the Iryo at a speed of between 160 and 200 km/h

The Spanish Independent Authority for Technical Investigation of Railway Accidents (AITAT) released a preliminary report detailing the mechanics of a high-speed train collision between an AVE and an Iryo service. The investigation estimates that the impact occurred at a speed between 160 and 200 km/h, causing the front car of the AVE to embed into the rear car of the Iryo, resulting in both vehicles overturning off the track embankment. The remaining cars of the AVE derailed completely, with several falling down the slope, while most Iryo cars also derailed except for the first two. The report highlights a degraded operational state caused by a failure in the LZB signaling system at 8:31 AM, which forced trains to operate under lateral signal blocking and required manual information exchange between drivers and control centers. AITAT notes that necessary mitigation barriers did not function during the incident chain. The authority has secured the onboard recorders under police custody and is currently gathering data before proceeding to interviews and infrastructure inspections.

The Independent Authority for Technical Investigation of Railway, Maritime and Civil Aviation Accidents and Incidents, known as AITAT, released its preliminary findings on Thursday regarding the high-speed train collision at Urda. The report estimates that the impact occurred at a speed between 160 and 200 kilometers per hour. This initial assessment follows the tragic incident that took place on Wednesday morning, resulting in 69 deaths and hundreds of injuries. While the specific velocity data will require further verification using the onboard legal recorder, often described as a black box, the authority has detailed the sequence of mechanical failures and operational decisions that led to the crash. The collision happened at 8:53 a.m. on Wednesday on track two of the Madrid-Seville high-speed line. An Iryo train, consisting of eight vehicles with 147 passengers and five crew members aboard, was stopped at the entrance to Urda station. It was struck by an AVE train, which comprised eight cars carrying 379 passengers and seven crew members. According to the AITAT document, car number eight of the AVE, identified as the leading car based on the train’s numbering system, became embedded in car number one of the Iryo, the trailing car. Both vehicles ended up overturned and rotated at the foot of the track embankment. The force of the impact caused extensive derailment. For the AVE train, all remaining cars derailed completely. Cars numbered one through six stayed on the platform, while car seven fell down the embankment. Car three, the third-to-last car in the direction of travel, was pierced by a fragment of deformed rail track. Regarding the Iryo train, all cars derailed except for the first two, numbers seven and eight. In addition to the trailing car, cars two and three also fell down the embankment. The investigation highlights a degraded operating situation that began earlier in the day. At 8:31 a.m., a failure in the LZB signaling system forced trains to operate under Lateral Signaling Block control, abbreviated as BSL. This change required the Adif Regulation and Control Center and the train drivers to exchange information manually to manage traffic. The AITAT report outlines a chain of faults, instructions, and actions that potentially led to the collision, noting that necessary mitigation barriers failed to function effectively during the critical moments. The technical investigation team was notified of the accident at 9:10 a.m. on Wednesday. Three investigator technicians were mobilized immediately. They departed around 10:20 a.m. and arrived at the scene near 12:15 p.m. Upon arrival, the team inspected the collision point, the infrastructure, the damaged vehicles, and the extent of the damage. They took photographs and interviewed witnesses present at the site. Following this, the group moved to the Urda Local Operational Post to inspect and collect event records from the interlocking system. A second team, comprising the director of railway accident technical investigation and an advisor from the AITAT railway sector, traveled to the Adif High-Speed Regulation and Control Center located in Atocha. There, they examined the position of the circulation manager responsible for the section where the accident occurred. The investigators reviewed the telephone log book, visualized video recordings, and listened to audio recordings of communications made in the minutes prior to the crash. They collected copies of these materials and gathered information from Adif staff present at the center. However, the team has not yet been able to interview the primary personnel involved in the immediate response, as those individuals were not in a condition to undergo interviews. On Thursday, the investigative team participated in the removal of onboard recorders from both trains. This operation was conducted jointly with judicial police and the railway companies. The recovered devices have been placed under the custody of the Civil Guard. In some instances, the severe physical state of the vehicles made access to these recording elements difficult. The AITAT stated that it is currently in the phase of collecting on-site information and compiling documentation and data from various registers. Future phases of the investigation will include additional measures such as formal interviews, inspections of other facilities or rolling stock, and reviews of maintenance records for the infrastructure. The authority emphasized that the current report reflects the information gathered within the first 24 hours of the tragedy. The specific speed of impact remains an estimate pending the analysis of the onboard legal recorder data. The focus now shifts to understanding why safety systems did not prevent the collision despite the degraded signaling conditions that had been in effect for over twenty minutes before the crash.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

La Vanguardia logoLa VanguardiaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 95
An initial report indicates that the AVE collided with the Iryo at a speed of between 160 and 200 km/h

The Spanish Independent Authority for Technical Investigation of Railway Accidents (AITAT) released a preliminary report detailing the mechanics of a high-speed train collision between an AVE and an Iryo service. The investigation estimates that the impact occurred at a speed between 160 and 200 km/h, causing the front car of the AVE to embed into the rear car of the Iryo, resulting in both vehicles overturning off the track embankment. The remaining cars of the AVE derailed completely, with several falling down the slope, while most Iryo cars also derailed except for the first two. The report highlights a degraded operational state caused by a failure in the LZB signaling system at 8:31 AM, which forced trains to operate under lateral signal blocking and required manual information exchange between drivers and control centers. AITAT notes that necessary mitigation barriers did not function during the incident chain. The authority has secured the onboard recorders under police custody and is currently gathering data before proceeding to interviews and infrastructure inspections.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a technical accident investigation involving major national infrastructure and public safety. While the subject matter carries significant political weight due to potential regulatory failures and government accountability, the specific text provided relies exclusively on the

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the details found in the second article regarding the AITAT report, including specific speeds, car numbers, and timeline events. It faithfully represents the technical findings without adding unsupported speculation.

Why objectivity (95): The tone is strictly journalistic and neutral. It reports the facts of the accident investigation using objective language, avoiding emotional adjectives or subjective commentary.

20minutos logo20minutosIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 95
The first report estimates that the crash in Urda occurred between 160 and 200 km / h

The Spanish Independent Authority for Technical Investigation of Railway Accidents (AITAT) released its preliminary report on the recent train collision at Urda, estimating the impact speed was between 160 and 200 km/h. The investigation determined that the front car of the AVE train became embedded in the rear car of the Iryo train, causing both vehicles to overturn and roll down the embankment, while the rest of the AVE train derailed completely. The report highlights a critical failure in safety protocols after a fault in the LZB signaling system forced trains to operate under lateral signal blocking, requiring manual coordination between drivers and control centers. AITAT notes that necessary mitigation barriers did not function during the incident, leading to the severe derailments described. The authority has secured the onboard recorders under police custody and is currently in the phase of gathering site data, documentation, and preparing for further interviews and infrastructure inspections.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a major national disaster involving state-owned infrastructure and regulatory oversight. While the subject matter is highly sensitive due to potential government liability and public safety failures, the specific text provided relies exclusively on technical findings from the

Why factuality (95): This text contains nearly identical information to the first article, citing the same AITAT report figures and sequence of events. The consistency between the two sources supports the high likelihood of accuracy for these specific technical details.

Why objectivity (95): The writing style is dry and informative, focusing solely on the transmission of data from the official report. There is no evident bias, sensationalism, or opinion injected into the narrative.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories