ON
← Back to feed
A US judge orders Meta to pay $567 million for harming the health and safety of teenagers on Instagram and Facebook
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

A US judge orders Meta to pay $567 million for harming the health and safety of teenagers on Instagram and Facebook

A US court has ruled that Meta must pay $567 million to a youth mental health compensation fund, citing the company's algorithm design as a 'public nuisance' that harms adolescents' health and safety. The ruling by Judge Bryan Biedscheid in Santa Fe, New Mexico, follows a previous $375 million judgment against Meta for violating child protection laws. The decision comes after a multi-year legal battle initiated by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, who accused Meta's platforms of contributing to a mental health crisis among young people and exposing them to sexual predators. The ruling mandates the creation of a compensation fund, temporary usage limits for minors, notification restrictions, and improved abuse reporting systems. This case is part of a broader trend of lawsuits against tech giants over their impact on youth well-being, with several countries already banning social media access for minors.

1 reports

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒Center5 hr. ago
A US judge orders Meta to pay $567 million for harming the health and safety of teenagers on Instagram and Facebook

A US court has ruled that Meta must pay $567 million to a youth mental health compensation fund, citing the company's algorithm design as a 'public nuisance' that harms adolescents' health and safety. The ruling by Judge Bryan Biedscheid in Santa Fe, New Mexico, follows a previous $375 million judgment against Meta for violating child protection laws. The decision comes after a multi-year legal battle initiated by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, who accused Meta's platforms of contributing to a mental health crisis among young people and exposing them to sexual predators. The ruling mandates the creation of a compensation fund, temporary usage limits for minors, notification restrictions, and improved abuse reporting systems. This case is part of a broader trend of lawsuits against tech giants over their impact on youth well-being, with several countries already banning social media access for minors.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's ruling and its implications without overtly favoring any political ideology. While the issue of tech regulation is politically charged, the reporting focuses on the legal findings and consequences rather than promoting a specific political agenda. The tone remains客观,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories