ON
← Back to feed
Flight into Rujevica's pitch after the game, fined 920 euros and banned for a year.
Croatia⚽ SportsCenter8/29/2026

Flight into Rujevica's pitch after the game, fined 920 euros and banned for a year.

A 45-year-old Croatian citizen was banned from attending football matches involving HNK Rijecka and the Croatian national team for one year after running onto the field at Rujevica stadium following a game. The incident occurred on August 27th around 10:40 PM, after the match ended. The man, under the influence of alcohol, crossed the protective barrier and entered the restricted area. Police officers from the first police station in Rijeka conducted an investigation and forwarded him to the local court. The court ruled him guilty under the Law on Preventing Disorder at Sports Events, imposing a fine of 920 euros and ordering him to cover court costs. Additionally, he received two protective measures: a one-year ban from attending such matches and mandatory reporting to the police station and submission of his travel documents during this period. The restriction applies both domestically and internationally.

A 45-year-old man has been fined €920 and banned from attending football matches for one year after running onto the pitch at Stadion Rujevica in Rijeka following a match between HNK Rijeka and Midtjylland. The incident occurred on Thursday, August 27, around 10:40 PM local time, shortly after the game concluded. According to police reports, the man was under the influence of alcohol when he crossed the protective fence and entered the playing area, which is reserved for players, referees, and other participants in the sporting event. He was immediately detained and taken to the police station, where an indictment was filed against him before being brought before the Municipal Court in Rijeka. The court ruled against the man using the Sports Disruption Prevention Act, finding him guilty of disrupting public order during a sports event. In addition to the financial penalty, the judge imposed two protective measures. For the duration of one year, the man is prohibited from attending any matches involving HNK Rijeka or the Croatian national team, both domestically and abroad. During this period, he must inform the police and present his travel documents whenever such matches take place. The incident took place during a crucial match for HNK Rijeka's qualification campaign in the Conference League. The club had just finished its encounter with Midtjylland, and the disruption caused by the man’s actions could have potentially impacted the game's flow and safety. Police emphasized that the individual's behavior posed a risk to the integrity of the competition and the well-being of all involved. The man was apprehended immediately after the incident and processed through the legal system swiftly. His case was handled under an expedited procedure due to the nature of the offense, which falls under the category of disturbing public order and peace. The court's decision reflects the seriousness of interfering with a sporting event, particularly when alcohol is involved, as it can lead to unpredictable and dangerous situations. The ban extends beyond domestic matches, affecting the man's ability to attend games wherever HNK Rijeka or the Croatian national team compete internationally. This measure aims to ensure that individuals who have previously disrupted sporting events are prevented from doing so again, even outside the country. As part of the conditions, the man must check in with the police and provide his travel documents each time a relevant match occurs, whether in Croatia or elsewhere. In addition to the fine and the ban, the man is required to cover the costs associated with the judicial proceedings. These expenses are typically determined based on the complexity of the case and the resources used by the court. The ruling serves as a deterrent for others considering similar actions, highlighting the consequences of alcohol-related misconduct during sporting events. The incident underscores the importance of maintaining order and respect for the rules governing sports competitions. Authorities continue to emphasize the need for spectators to remain within designated areas and avoid any behavior that could endanger players, officials, or fellow fans. Such incidents are rare but can have serious repercussions, both legally and for the sport itself.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 838/29/2026
Alcoholic runs on the lawn of Rujevice: he lost 920 euros and for a year can not go to the games

A 45-year-old man was fined 920 euros and banned from attending football matches for one year after running onto a sports field at Rujevice stadium while under the influence of alcohol. The incident occurred on August 27, 2026, following a match between NK Rijeka and Midtjylland in the Conference League qualifiers. He breached a protective fence and entered the restricted area where players, referees, and other participants were present. He was immediately arrested by police, who filed an indictment against him, and later appeared before the local court. The court imposed a fine and two protective measures: a one-year ban from attending matches for NK Rijeka and the Croatian national team, along with mandatory notification to police and submission of travel documents during those matches.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual legal consequence of a specific individual's actions without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the enforcement of laws related to public order at sports events, which is a regulatory matter rather than a politically charged issue. While the subject involves law,

Why factuality (88): This article confirms the same facts as the first, including the fine, ban, and legal process. It adds more detail about the expeditious procedure and the specific match involved. The information is consistent with the first article and supports the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (83): The article maintains an objective tone, focusing on the legal outcome and the sequence of events. There is no overt emotional language, though the phrasing 'ostao bez 920 eura' slightly implies a negative judgment of the individual’s actions.

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/29/2026
Flight into Rujevica's pitch after the game, fined 920 euros and banned for a year.

A 45-year-old Croatian citizen was banned from attending football matches involving HNK Rijecka and the Croatian national team for one year after running onto the field at Rujevica stadium following a game. The incident occurred on August 27th around 10:40 PM, after the match ended. The man, under the influence of alcohol, crossed the protective barrier and entered the restricted area. Police officers from the first police station in Rijeka conducted an investigation and forwarded him to the local court. The court ruled him guilty under the Law on Preventing Disorder at Sports Events, imposing a fine of 920 euros and ordering him to cover court costs. Additionally, he received two protective measures: a one-year ban from attending such matches and mandatory reporting to the police station and submission of his travel documents during this period. The restriction applies both domestically and internationally.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal consequence of a sports-related offense without expressing any ideological or political stance. It presents the facts objectively, focusing on the legal ruling and penalties imposed by the court. There is no evident framing or emphasis that suggests a particular left-或

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the incident involving a 45-year-old man who was fined 920 euros and banned from attending matches for a year. It provides details such as the date, time, location, and legal basis for the punishment. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus among the oth

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and factual, presenting the incident without emotional language. However, there is a slight bias toward the consequences faced by the individual, which may imply judgment of his actions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories