ON
← Back to feed
London faces $160 billion wealth exodus as super-rich relocate to UAE and beyond
AE🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives5 hr. ago

London faces $160 billion wealth exodus as super-rich relocate to UAE and beyond

A report by Bloomberg indicates that the United Kingdom is experiencing a significant outflow of private wealth, with approximately $160 billion in combined assets leaving the country over the past two years. This includes billionaires and ultra-rich individuals who have either left Britain or significantly reduced their ties to the country. The exodus is attributed to changes in tax policies introduced by the Labour government, particularly the abolition of the non-domiciled tax regime, which previously allowed some wealthy residents to avoid UK taxes on overseas wealth. The trend has accelerated ahead of major tax reforms enacted in April 2025, with many high-net-worth individuals relocating to destinations such as Monaco, Switzerland, and the UAE. Notable examples include Chris Rokos, a British-born financier who moved to Greece, raising concerns about whether this trend might affect more deeply rooted UK-based professionals. The UAE has become a notable destination for these departing wealthy individuals.

London faces a significant wealth exodus, with an estimated $160 billion in combined assets leaving the city as the super-rich relocate to destinations such as the UAE, Monaco, Switzerland, and others. According to Bloomberg's analysis, the figure includes individuals and family fortunes who have either left Britain or drastically reduced their ties to the country over the past two years. This loss represents more than half the total wealth of those currently listed in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, highlighting the magnitude of the departure. The trend has accelerated since the Labour Party took power in 2024, driven by sweeping tax reforms aimed at addressing inequality. One of the most impactful changes was the abolition of the non-domiciled tax regime, which had enabled some wealthy residents to avoid UK taxation on overseas wealth for up to 15 years. Although originally planned under the previous Conservative administration, the policy was finalized under Labour, accompanied by a shorter preferential regime for foreign income and gains. Additional measures included higher taxes on inherited assets and profits from private-market deals, alongside uncertainty about future reforms, all contributing to growing concerns among high-net-worth individuals. Many of those leaving opted to move before the April 2025 reforms took effect, choosing locations such as Monaco, Switzerland, and the UAE. For several of these individuals, relocation was relatively straightforward, particularly among foreign-born billionaires and wealthy families with less deep-rooted ties to Britain. However, there is concern that the trend may extend to more UK-born financiers and entrepreneurs. Notable among those who have left is Chris Rokos, a British-born financier and major taxpayer who recently relocated to Greece. His departure has sparked discussions about whether the exodus might affect a broader segment of the population. The UAE has become a prominent destination for departing wealth, with figures such as Shravin Mittal, son of Indian businessman Sunil Mittal, establishing a presence there. Mittal, who previously ran his investment firm in Britain, has set up a branch of his company, Unbound, in the UAE. Other notable exits include Ann Kaplan Mulholland, a Canadian-born investor who moved to Italy after purchasing a £5.5 million medieval castle in Kent in 2023. While the loss of wealth is substantial, London's role as a global financial hub remains intact. Despite the exodus, the city continues to hold considerable influence in international finance. The UK government has pursued tighter tax policies to stabilize the economy, scrapping the non-dom regime and adjusting capital gains tax, property taxes, and national insurance contributions. Further changes are anticipated in the upcoming budget, as policymakers seek to address the challenges posed by the shifting landscape of high-net-worth individuals.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Gulf News logoGulf NewsParty-aligned🔒ConservativeFactual 90Objective 805 hr. ago
London faces $160 billion wealth exodus as super-rich relocate to UAE and beyond

A report by Bloomberg indicates that the United Kingdom is experiencing a significant outflow of private wealth, with approximately $160 billion in combined assets leaving the country over the past two years. This includes billionaires and ultra-rich individuals who have either left Britain or significantly reduced their ties to the country. The exodus is attributed to changes in tax policies introduced by the Labour government, particularly the abolition of the non-domiciled tax regime, which previously allowed some wealthy residents to avoid UK taxes on overseas wealth. The trend has accelerated ahead of major tax reforms enacted in April 2025, with many high-net-worth individuals relocating to destinations such as Monaco, Switzerland, and the UAE. Notable examples include Chris Rokos, a British-born financier who moved to Greece, raising concerns about whether this trend might affect more deeply rooted UK-based professionals. The UAE has become a notable destination for these departing wealthy individuals.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the tax policy changes as disruptive to the UK's ability to retain wealthy residents, emphasizing the negative impact of Labour's reforms. It highlights the shift in wealth to countries like the UAE and mentions specific instances where wealthy individuals have moved abroad, which

Why factuality (90): The article accurately references Bloomberg's methodology and clarifies that the $160 billion figure represents the value of wealth held by individuals who have left or reduced ties, not actual cash movement. It mentions the abolition of the non-domicile tax regime and aligns with the cross-source c

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, acknowledging both the scale of the exodus and the complexity of the issue. It avoids overtly emotional language and presents the situation as a matter of debate rather than taking a clear stance.

The National logoThe NationalParty-alignedConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 708 hr. ago
UK loses £120bn as super-wealthy flee

A wealth index analysis reveals that the UK has lost £120 billion in potential tax revenue due to the departure of super-wealthy individuals since the Labour Party took power. Over a dozen billionaires, including steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal and telecoms investor Shravin Bharti Mittal, have moved to countries like the UAE, Monaco, Switzerland, and Italy, citing more favorable tax regimes. Chris Rokos, a hedge-fund tycoon and major taxpayer, has also relocated abroad. Legal expert David Lesperance highlights the significant economic impact of these departures, noting that billionaires contribute disproportionately to the tax base through various channels. He warns that the UK's recent tax reforms, such as scrapping non-dom status and altering capital gains tax, may have accelerated this trend. The government faces pressure to address the issue ahead of the upcoming Autumn Statement.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the UK's tax policy changes as contributing to the exodus of billionaires, implying that the Labour government's fiscal measures are driving this trend. While the article presents data objectively, the emphasis on the negative impact of these policies and the suggestion that theUK

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'super-wealthy flee' and 'hole,' suggesting a negative framing of the situation. While it includes quotes from experts, the overall tone leans toward emphasizing the loss to the UK, potentially favoring a narrative of economic decline.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories