The Court of Assize of Appeal in Milan has confirmed the 27-year prison sentence for Daniele Rezza, a 21-year-old who stabbed and killed Manuel Mastrapasqua during a robbery attempt over a pair of wireless earbuds worth €14. The verdict was delivered on September 20, 2025, following a second-degree trial that had been reopened after the defense requested a psychiatric evaluation. The court ruled that Rezza’s actions constituted aggravated voluntary homicide and aggravated robbery, with general mitigating factors deemed equivalent. The judges rejected the argument that the crime was motivated by trivial reasons, which would have justified a harsher penalty. The sentence was upheld as requested by prosecutor Olimpia Bossi, and compensation was ordered against Rezza in favor of the victim’s mother and two brothers, represented by lawyer Roberta Minotti. Rezza attacked Mastrapasqua on October 11, 2024, while the victim was returning home from a shift at a supermarket on Via Farini in Milan. After disembarking from a tram at Rozzano, Rezza approached Mastrapasqua and stabbed him near the heart with a knife. According to statements made by Rezza after his arrest on October 13, 2024, he intended to steal money, a phone, and anything else he could sell. He gave the stolen earbuds to his father, who discarded them before accompanying Rezza to the Pieve Emanuele train station. From there, Rezza took a train to Pavia and then a bus to Alessandria, where he was eventually apprehended. During the trial, the court considered evidence from a psychiatric report conducted by Dr. Mara Bertini, which concluded that Rezza possessed full mental capacity at the time of the offense. The report noted that although emotional regulation issues and reactive aggression were clinically significant, they did not meet the legal definition of a mental illness relevant to forensic purposes. In its initial ruling, the first-instance court had taken into account Rezza’s young age, describing his act as impulsive and disproportionate to the value of the item he sought to steal. However, the court dismissed arguments that socioeconomic hardship should be considered as an aggravating factor, stating such reasoning would unfairly prejudice residents of Rozzano and other similar areas. The defense, led by attorney Tiziana Bacicca, expressed satisfaction with the rejection of the trivial motives aggravation but argued for a reduced sentence, citing Rezza’s alleged vulnerability and psychological challenges. The prosecution, however, maintained that the sentence was appropriate given the severity of the crime. Michael, one of the victims’ siblings, responded to the verdict with firm disapproval, stating that Rezza’s apologies, offered nearly a year after the killing, held no weight. He emphasized that the family does not support restorative justice and is content with the sentence remaining unchanged. His legal representative, Roberta Minotti, criticized the nature of Rezza’s apologies, calling them procedural rather than sincere. She described Rezza as indifferent to the pain he caused and stressed the need for a rehabilitative path, noting that the years of incarceration could provide an opportunity for reflection and change. Meanwhile, the defense continued to argue that Rezza’s personal circumstances warranted leniency, despite the court’s refusal to acknowledge this as a valid mitigating factor. The case has sparked broader discussions about the role of mental health in criminal sentencing and the ethical implications of using financial gain as a motive for violence. Legal experts have pointed to the complexity of balancing punitive measures with rehabilitation, especially in cases involving young offenders. As the final appeal period approaches, the focus will remain on whether the sentence can be further adjusted or if the current decision stands as the final judgment. For now, the court’s decision underscores the gravity of the crime and the legal system’s approach to accountability in cases of violent theft leading to death.
8 reports
la RepubblicaIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 8516 days agoThe Italian Supreme Court (Cassazione) has upheld the appeal court's ruling regarding the case of Roger, a jeweler from Grinzane Cavour who shot dead two robbers during a robbery. The court determined that Roger was not in immediate danger at the time of the shooting and was not defending himself or his family. Roger had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder stemming from a previous robbery incident and had previously assaulted the family of his daughter's boyfriend. The court's decision clarifies that Roger's actions did not constitute legitimate self-defense under Italian law.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal judgment from Italy's highest court regarding a self-defense case. It provides factual information about the court's ruling and the circumstances surrounding the incident without overtly favoring any side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal interpretation
Why factuality (95): The article accurately explains why Roggero's actions were not considered legitimate defense. It references the court's decision and provides legal reasoning that aligns with the primary source. The facts are well-supported.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral and informative tone, explaining the legal rationale without showing bias towards either party involved in the case.
Il GiornaleParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 8012 days agoA 21-year-old man, Daniele Rezza, has been convicted of voluntary homicide aggravated by reduced defense and robbery, with the sentence of 27 years confirmed by the Milan Appellate Court. The conviction follows his attack on 31-year-old Manuel Mastrapasqua on October 11, 2024, during which Rezza allegedly stabbed him after attempting to rob him. Rezza claimed he did not intend to kill but wanted to steal, while the victim’s mother disputed this account. The court rejected the aggravating factor of trivial motives but acknowledged Rezza’s capacity to understand and will actions at the time of the crime. A psychiatric evaluation noted emotional regulation issues and reactive aggression in Rezza, though these were deemed insufficient to qualify as a mental illness under forensic standards.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced legal judgment without overt ideological framing. It reports the court's decision based on evidence and expert testimony, without emphasizing political implications or taking sides beyond the legal process. The focus remains on the judicial outcome rather than broader
Why factuality (90): The article confirms the appellate court’s decision to uphold the 27-year sentence for Daniele Rezza, citing the charges and the exclusion of the 'futili motivi' aggravating factor. It accurately reflects the legal outcome and includes relevant details such as the victim’s background and Rezza’s def
Why objectivity (80): While the article is generally objective, it includes some emotionally charged language when quoting Rezza’s statement about wanting to take everything from the victim. This slightly skews the tone toward the prosecution’s perspective, though it remains largely factual.
ANSAIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8012 days agoDaniele Rezza, a 21-year-old man, was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Milan to receive a 27-year prison sentence for stabbing and killing Manuel Mastrapasqua, a 31-year-old man, during a robbery in Rozzano, near Milan, on October 11, 2024. The victim had just gotten off a tram and was attacked by Rezza, who wanted to steal his wireless headphones worth €14. The court upheld the charges of aggravated voluntary homicide and aggravated robbery but rejected the aggravating factor of 'trivial motives.' The sentencing remains at 27 years, as requested by the assistant prosecutor, and includes compensation for the victim’s family—his mother and two brothers—who were represented by lawyer Roberta Minotti. The court also reserved judgment on whether to accept Rezza’s request for restorative justice, which had previously been denied. During the incident, Rezza stated he intended to take everything from the victim that could be resold. Following the attack, the victim’s father discarded the headphones and took him to the station, where Rezza was later arrested after traveling to Pavia and then Alessandria. A psychiatric evaluation concluded that Rezza had full mental capacity at the time,
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal trial with no overtly biased language, framing, or emphasis. It reports the legal outcome, the charges, and the reasoning behind them without taking a stance on the moral or social implications of the crime. The focus is on the judicial process, a
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the legal proceedings and the compensation issues related to Roggero's case. It provides detailed information about the financial obligations and the legal framework surrounding them. The facts are consistent with the primary source.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a balanced manner, discussing both the legal requirements and the perspectives of the affected families without overt bias.
Il Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 7514 days agoMario Roggero, un gioielliere accusato di aver ucciso due rapinatori durante una rapina, ha visto condannato definitivamente per omicidio. Tuttavia, la sua vicenda giudiziaria non è conclusa, poiché rimangono da definire i risarcimenti ai familiari delle vittime. Roggero ha già pagato 300mila euro in sede di udienza preliminare, ma i legali dei familiari sostengono che siano necessari ulteriori pagamenti. La Corte d’Appello ha chiarito che il risarcimento non si basa sulla capacità lavorativa persa, ma sul danno non patrimoniale subito dai familiari, come la perdita del rapporto parentale. L'avvocato Giuseppe Roberto Caruso ha espresso preoccupazione per il fatto che Roggero non abbia ancora versato alcuna somma definitive.
Bias read (Center): L'articolo presenta una descrizione obiettiva del caso legale di Mario Roggero senza un forte slanto ideologico. Menziona opinioni di entrambe le parti (ad esempio, la posizione di Giorgia Meloni), ma non privilegia una visione politica specifica. Non ci sono evidenti scelte di parola cariche o un'è
Why factuality (88): This article explains Salvini's stance on the case, referencing his call for clemency and the legal framework. It includes direct quotes from Salvini and the minister, which are consistent with other articles. The factual content is reliable and aligned with the primary source.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents Salvini's arguments in a way that emphasizes his political position, potentially influencing the reader's view of the case. The tone is supportive of Salvini's stance, though not overly emotive.
Il GiornaleParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 7511 days ago The tire maker who killed after 38 thefts: archivesIn 2018, Fredy Pacini, a 58-year-old tire mechanic from Monte San Savino, Arezzo, faced 38 break-ins over several months. One night, two thieves broke into his workshop by smashing a window with a pickaxe. Pacini fired five shots with a Glock pistol in self-defense, resulting in the death of one of the intruders, Tonjoc Mircea. The prosecution initially requested the case be archived under the defense of necessity but argued that Pacini acted recklessly and exceeded the limits of justifiable self-defense. In 2021, the court officially closed the case under new legislation that recognizes home-based self-defense and excludes punishment for those acting under severe distress due to an ongoing threat.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of legal proceedings involving self-defense laws and does not exhibit clear ideological bias. It reports on judicial decisions and legal interpretations without overtly favoring either side of the argument.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the case of Fredy Pacini from Monte San Savino who shot and killed a burglar during a break-in. It mentions the prosecution's request for dismissal due to excessive use of force and the final acquittal based on new legislation. The information aligns with the cross-source cons
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts but uses emotionally charged language such as 'ammazzò' (killed) and describes the legal outcome in a somewhat biased manner by emphasizing the prosecution’s stance. It lacks neutrality in describing the legal implications.
OpenIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7512 days agoThe Court of Assize Appeal in Milan has confirmed the conviction of 21-year-old Daniele Rezza for the murder of Manuel Mastrapasqua in October 2024 during a robbery. Rezza stabbed Mastrapasqua, who was returning home after work, near his heart in Rozzano, Milan, over a pair of wireless earbuds worth €14. The court upheld charges of aggravated voluntary homicide and aggravated robbery but rejected the aggravating factor of trivial motives. Rezza had claimed he wanted to steal anything he could sell, including money and a phone. His father later discarded the earbuds and helped him flee, but Rezza was eventually caught in Alessandria. A psychiatric evaluation concluded that Rezza had full mental capacity at the time of the crime, despite emotional regulation issues and reactive aggression. The victim’s family expressed dissatisfaction with Rezza’s apology, rejecting any form of restorative justice, while his defense argued that the sentence did not account for mitigating factors.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal case involving a violent crime and legal proceedings. While the case involves law enforcement and judicial processes, the framing remains neutral, focusing on factual details of the crime, trial outcomes, and reactions from both the victim's family and the defendant
Why factuality (85): This article confirms the conviction of Daniele Rezza for killing Manuel Mastrapasqua over stolen earbuds. It provides accurate details about the crime, legal proceedings, and sentence, matching the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (75): The article remains largely neutral, presenting the facts without significant emotional language. However, it occasionally emphasizes the victim's perspective, which may lean slightly toward a sympathetic tone.
Il Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7012 days ago He killed Manuel Mastrapasqua for headphones, confirmed sentence of 27 years for Daniele RezzaThe Court of Assize Appeal in Milan has confirmed a 27-year prison sentence for Daniele Rezza, a 21-year-old who stabbed and killed Manuel Mastrapasqua on October 11, 2024, in Rozzano, near Milan. The attack occurred while Mastrapasqua was returning home from work at a supermarket, after he had exited a tram. Rezza, who claimed he was looking for anything to sell, gave the victim’s earbuds to his father before fleeing by train and bus. The court rejected the aggravating factor of trivial motives but acknowledged the severity of the crime. The verdict aligns with the request made by prosecutor Olimpia Bossi and includes compensation for the victim’s family. A psychiatric report concluded that Rezza was fully capable of understanding and willing action at the time of the crime, ruling out mental illness as a mitigating factor.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual legal proceeding without overt ideological framing. While the crime is clearly condemned, the judicial process is described objectively, with balanced acknowledgment of both the prosecution's stance and the defense's arguments. There is no evident left or right leaning
Why factuality (85): The article covers the case of Daniele Rezza, confirming the conviction for murder and robbery. It provides detailed information about the incident, the legal proceedings, and the sentencing, aligning closely with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (70): While factual, the article uses emotive language when discussing the victim's family and the legal outcome, suggesting a slight bias toward the victim's perspective rather than maintaining complete neutrality.
Il GiornaleParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 7011 days ago He fired three shots and ended up acquitted: "He didn't want to kill the robbers"In 2015, Graziano Stacchio, a gas station worker in Ponte di Nanto (Vicenza), shot back at armed robbers who were robbing a jewelry store near his service station. The robbers were heavily armed, including with a Kalashnikov 7.62 rifle, recognized as a military weapon. Stacchio fired three shots, two of which hit the car's bodywork and one struck the thigh of one of the robbers, not in a lethal area—directed toward the car’s engine. Initially investigated for excessive self-defense, Stacchio was later acquitted and granted self-defense. In 2016, the surviving robbers were tried and sentenced to nine years in prison and ordered to pay damages.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the incident, legal proceedings, and outcomes without overtly favoring any side. It includes details of the event, the legal defense arguments, and the judicial outcome, providing balanced information without apparent ideological framing.
Why factuality (80): The article discusses a different case involving Graziano Stacchio but provides relevant background on self-defense laws. It accurately describes the events and legal outcomes of the past case. However, it doesn't directly relate to Roggero's case.
Why objectivity (70): The article is neutral in tone, providing historical context on self-defense laws without taking a stance on Roggero's case specifically.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Italy
