ON
← Back to feed
Uber removes 'unacceptable' surcharge for disabled passengers
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive12 hr. ago

Uber removes 'unacceptable' surcharge for disabled passengers

Uber has removed a $5 surcharge for its Assist service, which provides support for passengers with disabilities, after criticism from advocacy groups and service providers who called it discriminatory. The fee was introduced in May as part of efforts to improve reliability and reduce wait times, but was widely seen as a 'disability tax.' Advocates argued that accessibility should not come with a premium price, and that the surcharge was imposed without proper consultation with key stakeholders. Uber acknowledged the concerns and stated it would cover the additional payments to drivers for the next 30 days. The decision follows a previous legal settlement involving a customer denied multiple rides due to her guide dog, prompting an external review of Uber’s operations.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicProgressive12 hr. ago
Uber removes 'unacceptable' surcharge for disabled passengers

Uber has removed a $5 surcharge for its Assist service, which provides support for passengers with disabilities, after criticism from advocacy groups and service providers who called it discriminatory. The fee was introduced in May as part of efforts to improve reliability and reduce wait times, but was widely seen as a 'disability tax.' Advocates argued that accessibility should not come with a premium price, and that the surcharge was imposed without proper consultation with key stakeholders. Uber acknowledged the concerns and stated it would cover the additional payments to drivers for the next 30 days. The decision follows a previous legal settlement involving a customer denied multiple rides due to her guide dog, prompting an external review of Uber’s operations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the removal of the surcharge as a positive outcome driven by advocacy and fairness, emphasizing the discriminatory nature of the fee and the lack of stakeholder consultation. While it presents both sides (Uber's initial justification and the critics' arguments), the emphasis on 'a

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories