U Rijeci je nedavno došlo do kontroverze oko procesije svetoga Vida, gdje su se pojavili simboli koji su povezani s ekstremnim ideologijama. Prema izvorskim izvršenjima, grupa muškaraca je tokom procesije nosila barjak s natpisom "Za dom spremni", a jedan od sudionika je imao tetovažu s nacističkim kukastim križem. Ova situacija je izazvala ozbiljan odgovor od strane Riječke nadbiskupije, koja je odbacila takve simbole kao neprihvatljive, posebno u kontekstu događaja koji se odvija u duhu dostojanstva i zajedništva. Gradonačelnica Iva Rinčić je također izrazila ogroman oporek prema tome što su takvi simboli pojavili u javnom prostoru, posebno u gradu koji ima duboko antifašističko nasljeđe. Njezin stav bio je jasno izražen: takvi simboli nisu mjesto u današnjem društvu, a posebno ne u Rijeci, gdje je identitet vezan uz odbacivanje ekstremizma, mržnje i revizionizma.
Dogodak je nastavio na tragu nespremnosti državnih institucija da reaguju na takve fenomene. Dok je Riječka nadbiskupija jasno osudila pojavu ustaških i nacističkih simbola, gradska vlast, uključujući gradonačelnicu, nije izrazila svoj stav. Lista za Rijeku je to kritizirala, tvrdi da je šutnja ili relativizacija takvih pojava nešto što ne predstavlja neutralnost, već prešutnu toleranciju. Iz liste se navodi da je Rijeka počivala na vrijednostima otvorenosti, različitosti i građanskih sloboda, a da je javni dužnosnici imali odgovornost jasno se odrediti prema pojavama koje vrijeđaju temeljne vrijednosti suvremene Europe. Takva reakcija, prema njima, pokazuje da postoje institucije koje su spremne osuditi takve pojave, dok gradskoj vlasti zamjeraju izostanak javnog stava o cijelom slučaju.
Međutim, problem nije ograničen na Rijeku. U Zagrebu, na zidovima pothodnika kod Osnovne škole Savski Gaj u Novom Zagrebu, ponovno su osvanuli grafiti s prijetnjama upućenim predsjedniku SDSS-a Miloradu Pupovcu. Ovaj put su grafiti bili izraženi u množini, što znači da se mogu odnositi na sve njegove srodnike ili sve one koje on u svojem političkom djelovanju predstavlja. Uz prijetnje su iscrtani i nacistički kukasti križevi, što je prvi put u ovom kontekstu. To je treći takav slučaj na istoj lokaciji ove godine. Prema izvorskim izvršenjima, takvi grafiti su se pojavili i krajem siječnja, a tada je nepoznati grafiter poručio da postoje "ustaše Novi Zagreb". U ožujku su se ponovili slični natpisi, s porukama poput "Kobre ustaše", "Ustani Ante" i "Ubij Pupovca", uz prijetnje policiji i navijačima Hajduka, uz notorno "Za dom spremni". Ove poruke su bile izražene istom lokacijom, istim potpisom i istim porukama, što ukazuje na sistematski pristup takvim manifestacijama.
Izvorima se navodi da su takvi grafiti bili zabilježeni i ranijih godina, uključujući 2021. godinu, kada je taj kvart i obližnji Remetinec isparan s deseticama grafita, s porukama mržnje i prijetnji usmjerenim prema Pupovcu i Srbima u Hrvatskoj. Predsjednik SDSS-a Milorad Pupovac je u ožujku komentirao takve grafiti, tvrdi da ga nisu iznenadili jer su takve poruke, poput "Ubij Srbina!", već dugo slobodno i nesmetano ispisivale ili uzvikuje u javnom prostoru, posebno za vrijeme i nakon sportskih ili muzičkih događaja. On je naveo da su takve poruke dio prisutne kulture mržnje koja se vidi po gradskim i drugim javnim prostorima, sličnim porukama kao što su ustaški pozdrav "Za dom spremni" i nacistički kukasti križevi. Pupovac je upozorio da su takve poruke često čuje i u Saboru, a da su neki javni mediji dali javni prostor bez osude i bez komentara. S takvim odnosom prema takvim porukama, može se očekivati njihovo širenje i radikalizacija. Dakle, može se pitati što sljedeće i tko je sljedeći.
Dok su takvi grafiti i simboli postali još jedan aspekt raspršenog ekstremizma, izvori navode da su takvi fenomeni postali češći u posljednjih godina. U tom kontekstu, Riječka nadbiskupija je izrazila jasnu stvarnu, a gradska vlast, iako je bila uključena u procesije, nije izrazila svoj stav. To je izazvalo kritiku iz strane Listi za Rijeku, koja je tvrdila da je šutnja ili relativizacija takvih pojava nešto što ne predstavlja neutralnost, već prešutnu toleranciju. Iz liste se navodi da je Rijeka počivala na vrijednostima otvorenosti, različitosti i građanskih sloboda, a da je javni dužnosnici imali odgovornost jasno se odrediti prema pojavama koje vrijeđaju temeljne vrijednosti suvremene Europe. Takva reakcija, prema njima, pokazuje da postoje institucije koje su spremne osuditi takve pojave, dok gradskoj vlasti zamjeraju izostanak javnog stava o cijelom slučaju.
10 reports
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 7517 days agoThe article discusses an incident during a religious procession in Rijeka where some participants were seen displaying Ustasha symbols ('Za dom spremni') and Nazi swastikas. Journalist Filip Brnelić from Novi List asked the Rijeka Archbishopric about this situation. The Archbishopric responded by stating they distance themselves from any Ustasha inscriptions or Nazi symbols regardless of context, emphasizing that the procession was a religious act of faith, prayer, and unity among God's people. They clarified that the initiative to invite veterans' associations came from the Pastoral Office of
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the journalist's inquiry and the official response from the Archbishopric without overtly favoring either side. It reports facts neutrally, including the presence of controversial symbols and the Church's stance against them, without apparent ideological bias.
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 75): This article provides detailed information from the Rijeka Archdiocese regarding their response to the incident, including their clarification that the procession was not a demonstration but an act of faith. It remains mostly factual but has a slight bias in favor of the Church’s position, lacking c
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7514 days agoGraffiti with direct threats against the leader of the Serbian people have reappeared on walls near the Primary School Savski Gaj in Novi Zagreb.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the reappearance of graffiti with threatening messages without taking a stance or using biased language. It presents the event factually without emphasizing any particular perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article provides detailed information about the graffiti targeting Milorad Pupovac, including specific locations and prior incidents. It accurately quotes the Srpsko narodno vijeće (SNV) and includes historical context. However, the tone leans toward emphasizing the threat and potential bias by
Novi listIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 7016 days agoRijeka's mayor, Iva Rinčić, strongly condemned the display of Ustasha and Nazi symbols during a procession for St. Vitus Day. A group of men displayed a flag with the inscription 'Za dom spremni' ('Ready for the Fatherland'), and one of them had a tattoo featuring the Nazi swastika. Rinčić emphasized that such symbols have no place in public spaces, especially during events celebrating the patron saint of Rijeka. She expressed agreement with Archbishop Mate Uzunić, who also criticized the presence of these symbols.
Bias read (Left): The article presents strong condemnation of far-right symbols and ideologies, aligning with anti-fascist values. The tone is unequivocally critical of nationalist and extremist expressions, reflecting a clear ideological stance against such symbols in public life.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the incident involving the display of Ustasha and Nazi symbols during the St. Vid procession, citing Iva Rinčić's condemnation. However, it leans toward the official stance by emphasizing her strong opposition, using emotionally charged terms like 'najoštrije osuđujemo
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 7814 days ago In New Zagreb, graffiti with threats against Milorad Pupovc has resurfacedGraffiti with threats directed at Milorad Pupovc, president of the Serbian Democratic Party (SDS), have reappeared on walls in the Novi Zagreb area near the Primary School Savski Gaj. The Serbian National Council reported this on Sunday.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the appearance of graffiti targeting a political figure without taking a stance, providing only the information stated by the Serbian National Council. There is no evident framing bias, loaded language, or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 78): The article presents the facts accurately, citing SNV and describing the graffiti events clearly. It includes direct quotes from Pupovac himself, adding balance. While still leaning on SNV’s narrative, it offers more neutrality by incorporating Pupovac’s response, improving the overall objectivity.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 7014 days agoA new threatening graffiti has appeared on walls near the Primary School Savski Gaj in Novi Zagreb, directly addressing Milorad Pupovc, the leader of the Serbian people in Croatia. The message includes an explicit call for his assassination and could potentially target all of his relatives or those associated with him politically.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific event—graffiti directed at a political figure—without overtly favoring any side. It presents the facts neutrally, describing the content of the graffiti without editorializing or emphasizing particular political perspectives. No clear bias in language or sourcing is
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 70): This article closely mirrors the first, quoting SNV and providing similar details about the graffiti. The factual content aligns with the cross-source consensus but lacks additional perspectives. The objectivity score is slightly lower due to the repeated emphasis on SNV’s statements without balanci
Novi listIndependentLeftFactual 93Objective 6517 days ago If the archbishop reacted, why is the mayor silent?Lista za Rijeku has criticized the absence of public reaction from the city authorities regarding the appearance of Ustasha and Nazi symbols during a religious procession. They praised the response from the Archbishop of Rijeka, Mate Uzunić, and emphasized that condemning such symbols is a Christian and civilizational duty. The group argues that the city, which historically promotes anti-fascist values and tolerance, should have been among the first to condemn any glorification of fascism, Nazism, or other totalitarian ideologies.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue through a strong emphasis on anti-fascist values, historical tradition, and civic responsibility, positioning the city’s silence as an implicit acceptance of extremism. It criticizes the local government for failing to act while praising the Church’s response, suggesting
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 65): The article accurately summarizes the situation and quotes List za Rijeku's criticism of the city government's silence. However, it presents a clear political viewpoint, favoring the party's stance over others, using phrases like 'toleriranje ekstremizma nikada nije donijelo ništa dobro' which refle
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6014 days agoAccording to the police, over the years, dozens of graffiti with threatening and offensive content directed at Pupovc and the Serbian community have been recorded in the area of Savski Grad and nearby Remetinec.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the existence of graffiti with threatening content without taking a stance or using biased language. It cites the police as an official source and presents the information factually.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article presents factual claims based on statements from SNV, but does not provide independent verification. The information appears consistent with cross-source consensus, though some details may rely solely on SNV’s account. The tone shows bias through phrases like 'govor mržnje' and quotes fr
Novi listIndependentCenter14 days ago In Zagreb, graffiti with death threats against Pupovce have been seen, along with carved and hooked crosses.In Novi Zagreb, graffiti containing death threats against Milorad Pupovac, the president of the Serbian Democratic Party (SDSS), have appeared on walls near the Primary School Savski Gaj. The Serbian National Council (SNV) reported that these graffiti, which include 'kukasti križevi' (crooked crosses), represent the third similar incident at the same location this year. Similar threatening messages targeting Pupovac and expressing hatred toward Serbs were previously seen in January and March. According to SNV, dozens of such graffiti with offensive content directed at Pupovac and the Serbian community have been recorded in the area over the years. Pupovac himself commented in March that such messages like 'Kill a Serb!' have long been freely expressed before, during, and after sports or music events.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the occurrence of threatening graffiti targeting a political figure without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from both the SNV and Pupovac, providing a balanced view of the situation without apparent bias in language or emphasis.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenter14 days agoThe Serbian National Council (SNV) reported that graffiti reading 'Kill Pupovac' appeared on walls near the Primary School Savski Gaj in Novi Zagreb over the weekend. The message was accompanied by swastikas and references to Ustasha symbols, including the letter 'U' and the phrase 'Ustani Ante.' This is the third time such messages have been found in the area this year, with similar threats directed at Pupovac appearing in January and March. The SNV claims these acts of hatred are part of a continuous pattern targeting Pupovac and Serbs in Croatia. In response, SDSS leader Milorad Pupovac stated that such messages are not new and reflect an existing culture of hate, often seen in public spaces and even in parliamentary debates.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives, including statements from the SNV and comments from Pupovac himself, without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the graffiti incidents and their implications without using biased language or selectively omitting viewpoints.
Index.hrIndependentCenter14 days agoThe Serbian National Council (SNV) reported that walls at the entrance of the Primary School Savski Gaj in Novi Zagreb were defaced with graffiti containing a direct threat to kill Milorad Pupovac, the leader of the Serbs in Croatia. The message was written in plural form, leading SNV to believe it could target Pupovac's relatives or those he represents politically. Alongside the message, Nazi-style swastikas were drawn, marking the third time this year such hate messages have appeared at the location. Similar threats and symbols had previously been found there in January and March, including calls for Pupovac's assassination, references to Ustashas, and support for fascism. SNV noted that these incidents are not new, recalling over thirty similar graffiti in the area in November 2021 targeting Pupovac and Serbs in Croatia. Pupovac himself commented on earlier incidents, stating that such messages are not surprising, as they reflect an existing culture of hatred visible in public spaces.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the graffiti and quotes both the SNV and Pupovac without overtly favoring either side. It includes details from both the organization and the individual affected, providing balanced context without apparent bias.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
%2CxPosition%3D.5%2CyPosition%3D.5%3BResize%3D(1200%2C675)%26impolicy%3Dmedium&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
