Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8010 days ago In Varaždin County, they claim that the permits for Tipos Resource were issued in accordance with the lawIn Varaždin County, officials assert that waste management permits issued to Tipos Resurs were granted in accordance with the law. During a conference addressing previous criticisms from the deputy mayor Miroslav Marković, Silvija Zagorec, deputy mayor of Varaždin, stated that approximately 30% of waste has already been removed from Podravska Street. The site in question was previously a factory owned by Tipos Resurs, operated by Monika and Josip Šincek, where around 5,000 tons of illegally dumped waste were discovered. Sanitation efforts began in June with a planned duration of 170 days, managed through a public procurement process by the State Inspectorate. Zagorec emphasized that both permits issued in 2015 and 2019 were based on complete legal documentation, including usage permits from the City of Varaždin. She reiterated that the permits were for the processing of non-hazardous waste and confirmed they were legally valid, supported by inspections from the relevant ministry in 2016 and 2019.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from official sources regarding the legality of permits issued to Tipos Resurs, emphasizing compliance with laws and citing oversight by state authorities. While there is some tension between local officials and critics, the framing remains balanced, focusing on fact
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about the legal basis for issuing permits to Tipos Resurs, citing years (2015 and 2019) and mentioning the involvement of local authorities like the City of Varaždin. It also references inspections by the relevant ministry in 2016 and 2019, aligning with the cro
Why objectivity (80): The article presents information from the deputy mayor in a neutral tone, focusing on procedural compliance and public availability of data. While it defends the legality of the permits, it does so without overtly biased language or emotional framing.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 6510 days ago The deputy mayor of the SDP wants to publish an analysis of the waste in VaraždinMiroslav Marković, zamjenik varaždinskog gradonačelnika (SDP), zahtijeva da se objavi analiza otpada koji se nalazi u bivšem industrijskom kompleksu Mundus Florijan Bobić u Varaždinu. Prema njemu, tvrtka Tipos Resurs, koja je koristila prostor nakon zatvaranja tvornice, godinama je utvrđivala nepravilnosti u gospodarenju otpadom, što je dovelo do povlačenja dozvole 2019. godine. Iako je nova dozvola izdana, inspekcijski nadzori su ponovno otkrili nepravilnosti, a MUP je također proveden nadzor. Marković navodi da je otpad, koji se vodio kao oporabljen, stigao iz Italije i Slovenije, a da je dio otpada tretiran kao opasan. On zahtijeva da se analiza otpada, koju, prema njemu, USKOK je napravio, objavi javnosti. Također, naglašava nedostatak kontrole u sistemu i povezuje situaciju s političkim ličnostima.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure tied to political figures, using strong language like 'Plenkovićevo smeće' which implies corruption or mismanagement linked to specific politicians. The emphasis on lack of control and direct connections to political appointments suggests a leftward
Why factuality (75): The article reports on claims made by Miroslav Marković regarding irregularities found during inspections and the increase in capacity at the facility. However, it lacks direct confirmation of these claims beyond his statements, and some details (like the exact amount of waste found) may not be corr
Why objectivity (65): The article leans toward a critical tone, emphasizing past irregularities and questioning the oversight process. The framing suggests skepticism toward the permits issued, potentially influencing reader perception through selective emphasis.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 5011 days ago The minister lashed out at the opposition, saying: 'They know they are not telling the truth, and it is getting into people's ears.'Ministarica zaštite okoliša i zelene tranzicije Marija Vučković je uživo u Pločama uključena u diskusiju o opozivu vlade zbog nedostatka državnog nadzora opasnog otpada. Ona naglašava da su nadležna tijela Republike Hrvatske provedena potpuna i neovisna istraživanja, a da su izvještaji o ilegalnim lokacijama prikupljeni putem komunalnog redarstva i elektroničkog sustava. Vučković osporuje izjave zastupnika u Saboru koji tvrde da su joj udari izdali dozvole, smatrajući ih lažima. Naglašava da su neke lokacije u Gospiću, Samoboru, Pazinu i drugim gradovima rezultat nezakonitih radnji, a da su potrebne hitne sanacije. Napominje da SDP priznaje teškoću u organiziranju hitnih sanacija, a da su dostupni modeli koji predlaže vremensku daljinu od više od 12 mjeseci.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of governmental oversight and accountability, emphasizing the need for stricter enforcement and transparency. The minister criticizes opposition members for spreading misinformation and highlights systemic issues within local governance. The tone suggests a左
Why factuality (60): This article focuses on religious discourse and does not provide specific factual information about the waste issue. It uses metaphorical language and theological references rather than concrete data or direct evidence related to the waste problem in Gospić.
Why objectivity (50): The tone is highly spiritual and abstract, using religious metaphors to frame the waste issue. This approach lacks neutrality and presents the topic through a moralistic lens, potentially biasing the reader’s understanding.