U.S. attorney who served for 54 minutes sues over firing by Trump

NBC NewsIndependentProgressive15 hr. ago

Roger Rogoff, a U.S. attorney temporarily appointed by a panel of federal judges in the Western District of Washington, was fired by President Donald Trump after just 54 minutes on the job. Rogoff, a former judge and prosecutor, filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging the firing was unlawful and violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. He argues that the president attempted to undermine Congress's constitutional authority by dismissing someone appointed by the judiciary without presidential approval. The Justice Department defended the action, stating that the district court failed to consult with the department during the selection process and that the president has the authority to remove temporary appointees. The case highlights ongoing tensions between the executive branch and the judicial process for filling federal positions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the firing of Roger Rogoff as a violation of constitutional procedures and emphasizes the conflict between the executive branch and the judicial process for appointing U.S. attorneys. It highlights the legal arguments made by Rogoff's attorneys, suggesting a critical view of Trump

The Washington TimesParty-alignedProgressive16 hr. ago

Roger Rogoff, the newly sworn-in U.S. attorney for western Washington, was abruptly fired by the Trump administration less than an hour after taking office. Rogoff, appointed by federal judges, claims the termination was unconstitutional and violated the authority of the judiciary to name prosecutors. He has filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the firing, which aligns with broader concerns about the Trump administration's attempts to replace judicially appointed prosecutors with Senate-confirmed nominees. The Justice Department defended the action, asserting the president's authority to remove such officials, while critics argue it undermines judicial independence and constitutional procedures.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Trump administration's actions as an overreach that violates constitutional norms and judicial authority, using language that emphasizes illegality and constitutional protection. It highlights the conflict between executive power and judicial appointment processes, presenting羅

CBS News (US)IndependentProgressive17 hr. ago

Former U.S. attorney Roger Rogoff, who was appointed by federal judges in the Western District of Washington, has sued the Trump administration after being fired by President Trump. Rogoff alleges that his removal violated federal statutes and the Constitution's Appointments Clause, which requires Senate confirmation for U.S. attorneys. He seeks a court order to reinstate him as the U.S. attorney until a replacement is nominated and confirmed. The lawsuit highlights ongoing tensions between the executive branch and judicial appointments, as Trump has previously dismissed other U.S. attorneys appointed by state judges. Rogoff’s case is part of a broader pattern of presidential firings of prosecutors placed by judges, raising concerns about the separation of powers.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Trump administration's action as an unconstitutional overreach, emphasizing legal violations and constitutional protections. It portrays the firing as part of a larger pattern of executive overstepping, aligning with progressive critiques of Trump's governance style. While the