ON
← Back to feed
Japan Today logo🏛️ Politics
Japan🏛️ PoliticsProgressive11 hr. ago

U.S. appeals court rejects Trump policy allowing swift deportations to third countries

A U.S. federal appeals court has rejected a Trump administration policy that enabled the rapid deportation of migrants to third countries without providing them opportunities to challenge the action based on safety concerns. The three-judge panel of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals largely upheld a lower court ruling that declared the Department of Homeland Security's policy unlawful, citing violations of due process rights. The policy, implemented under former President Donald Trump, allowed for deportations to countries where migrants had no prior ties, often with minimal notice. The decision comes amid ongoing legal battles, with the Trump administration having previously sought intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court. The ruling was issued in a class-action lawsuit representing migrants facing deportation to countries not previously mentioned in their removal orders. The policy required immigration authorities to rely on diplomatic assurances regarding the safety of destination countries or provide migrants with as little as six hours’ notice before deportation.

Advertisement

1 reports

Japan Today logoJapan TodayIndependentProgressive11 hr. ago
U.S. appeals court rejects Trump policy allowing swift deportations to third countries

A U.S. federal appeals court has rejected a Trump administration policy that enabled the rapid deportation of migrants to third countries without providing them opportunities to challenge the action based on safety concerns. The three-judge panel of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals largely upheld a lower court ruling that declared the Department of Homeland Security's policy unlawful, citing violations of due process rights. The policy, implemented under former President Donald Trump, allowed for deportations to countries where migrants had no prior ties, often with minimal notice. The decision comes amid ongoing legal battles, with the Trump administration having previously sought intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court. The ruling was issued in a class-action lawsuit representing migrants facing deportation to countries not previously mentioned in their removal orders. The policy required immigration authorities to rely on diplomatic assurances regarding the safety of destination countries or provide migrants with as little as six hours’ notice before deportation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the policy as a violation of due process rights, emphasizing the lack of transparency and potential dangers faced by migrants. It highlights the role of a Democratic appointee (Judge Murphy) in overturning the policy and notes the administration’s history of seeking judicial overr

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories