U ponedjeljak, naoružani napadač je ubio tajlandskog dužnosnika u uredu lokalne vlade na periferiji Bangkoka, nekoliko dana nakon što je pucnjava u školi u istoj regiji ponovno potaknula raspravu o kontroli oružja. Osumnjičeni napadač, bivši zastupnik Chalong Riewrang, pucao je na predsjednika pokrajinske uprave u Nonthaburiju zbog neslaganja oko posuđenog novca. Vozač dužnosnika je ranjen, ali nije u kritičnom stanju. Policija nije dao informacije o tome je li ubijeni dužnosnik bio naoružan. Dužnosnik je umro od zadobivenih rana u bolnici. Napadač je tvrdio da je otišao suočiti se s žrtvom zbog dugotrajnog spora, ali da je žrtva odbila razgovarati o tome. Prošloga petka je u zemlji došlo do pucnjava u kojoj je poginulo devet ljudi, uključujući napadača, a više od 20 je ranjeno. Premijer Anutin Charnvirakul ponovio je svoju namjeru da pooštri kontrolu oružja. Ministarstvo obrazovanja planira razviti nove protokole sigurnosti u školama, uključujući provjere mentalnog zdravlja i mjere za borbu protiv nasilja. Prema procjenama, u Tailandu ima 10,3 milijuna komada vatrenog oružja u civilnom posjedu, što je najviše u jugoistočnoj Aziji.
A 14-year-old student opened fire at a school near Bangkok on Friday, killing six people before taking his own life, according to police. The attack occurred at Debsirin Nonthaburi School, located on the northwestern outskirts of the capital, and marked the deadliest mass shooting in Thailand since 2022. The incident left seven dead, including the attacker, and injured 15 others, with some victims suffering wounds to their backs, chests, and hands. Eyewitness accounts described chaos as students fled the building in panic while teachers embraced each other in distress. According to police, the assailant fired at least 26 rounds during the attack, and authorities found another 34 rounds of ammunition on him. The weapon used was reportedly owned by his grandfather. One 18-year-old student told Reuters he initially thought the sounds were fireworks or someone hitting an object. “I didn’t think it was gunfire at first,” he said. “There were many shots, then it went quiet for a moment, and then the firing started again.” Police spokesperson Trairong Phophan confirmed that among the seven fatalities at the school was the attacker himself. Six others died, and 15 people were injured. The education minister, Prasert Jantararuangtong, stated that both teachers and students were among the victims. This marks the second school shooting in Thailand this year, following an incident in February when a teacher was killed at a southern school and one student was wounded. Emergency responders arrived at the scene while the shooting was still ongoing. They treated students with injuries to their backs, chests, and hands. On one floor of the school, they found a slain teacher, and in another room, a severely injured teacher. After the final shot, emergency personnel rushed to assist the attacker, who was discovered with a head wound and still had a pulse. Resuscitation efforts were immediately initiated, and the attacker was later transported to the hospital. The school had approximately 3,100 students enrolled for the 2025–2026 academic year and employed 147 teachers. Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul expressed deep sorrow over the tragedy, stating, “It’s terrible that such a thing happened. I am sad for the deceased and for the fact that such an event occurred in our country.” Gun violence and possession of firearms are not uncommon in Thailand, which has recorded several deadly attacks in recent years. The worst mass murder took place in 2022 when a former police officer killed 36 people, including 22 children, in a three-day rampage using knives and firearms. In July 2025, an attacker killed five people at a market in Bangkok before committing suicide. Earlier this year, a teacher was killed in a school shooting in the south, and in 2023, a 14-year-old boy killed two people and injured five at a luxury shopping mall in Bangkok. Following these incidents, the government tightened gun control measures, including a temporary ban on issuing new firearm licenses, restrictions on imports, and prohibiting access to firearms for individuals under 20 years old. According to the Small Arms Survey from 2017, there are approximately 10.3 million civilian-owned firearms in Thailand, equating to about 15 per 100 residents, making it the highest rate in Southeast Asia. The attack at Debsirin Nonthaburi School has reignited discussions about gun control and campus security in Thailand. Authorities have yet to provide further details on the investigation into the shooter's motives or whether he had prior threats or mental health issues. As the nation mourns the loss of lives, officials continue to assess how to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
Advertisement
Go to the primary sources (3)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
U ponedjeljak, naoružani napadač je ubio tajlandskog dužnosnika u uredu lokalne vlade na periferiji Bangkoka, nekoliko dana nakon što je pucnjava u školi u istoj regiji ponovno potaknula raspravu o kontroli oružja. Osumnjičeni napadač, bivši zastupnik Chalong Riewrang, pucao je na predsjednika pokrajinske uprave u Nonthaburiju zbog neslaganja oko posuđenog novca. Vozač dužnosnika je ranjen, ali nije u kritičnom stanju. Policija nije dao informacije o tome je li ubijeni dužnosnik bio naoružan. Dužnosnik je umro od zadobivenih rana u bolnici. Napadač je tvrdio da je otišao suočiti se s žrtvom zbog dugotrajnog spora, ali da je žrtva odbila razgovarati o tome. Prošloga petka je u zemlji došlo do pucnjava u kojoj je poginulo devet ljudi, uključujući napadača, a više od 20 je ranjeno. Premijer Anutin Charnvirakul ponovio je svoju namjeru da pooštri kontrolu oružja. Ministarstvo obrazovanja planira razviti nove protokole sigurnosti u školama, uključujući provjere mentalnog zdravlja i mjere za borbu protiv nasilja. Prema procjenama, u Tailandu ima 10,3 milijuna komada vatrenog oružja u civilnom posjedu, što je najviše u jugoistočnoj Aziji.
Bias read (Center): Članak neutralno opisuje događaje i političke posljediče, bez jasne strane ili stvaranja pretežnog smjera. Iako se govori o kontroli oružja, članak ne prikazuje jednu stranu već objašnjava različite aspekte i reakcije vlade i stručnjaka.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the basic facts of the incident, including the location, the involvement of a student, and the deaths of at least one teacher and the attacker. It aligns with the cross-source consensus, though it doesn’t provide the full casualty count mentioned in other reports.
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information in a very neutral manner, relying primarily on official statements and avoiding any subjective commentary or emotional language.
Na Tajlandu je ponedjeljak ubijen lokalni dužnosnik u uredu lokalne vlade na periferiji Bangkoka, nakon što je bivši zastupnik Chalong Riewrang pucao na njega zbog sporova oko posuđenog novca. Vozač dužnosnika je ranjen, ali nije u kritičnom stanju. Ovaj incident slijedi pucnjavu u školi u istoj pokrajini nedavno, gdje je poginulo devet ljudi, uključujući napadača. Premijer Anutin Charnvirakul obnavlja svoju namjeru da postreli kontrolu oružja, a Ministarstvo obrazovanja planira razvoj novih sigurnosnih protokola u školama. Tijekom posljednjih godina, Tajland ima jednu od najviše stopa posjedovanja vatrenog oružja u regiji, prema podacima iz 2017. godine.
Bias read (Center): Čak i ako se tematski fokusira na politiku oružja i sigurnost, članak neutralno opisuje događaje i reakcije vlasti bez jasno izraženog političkog stajališta. Iako se govori o problemima u društvenom i političkom kontekstu, tekst ne koristi značajno opterećenu terminologiju ili preferira jednu stranu
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the attack on the local official but incorrectly references the school shooting, stating nine people were killed when other sources indicate fewer. This creates a factual inconsistency between this article and others.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone overall, presenting the facts without overt bias. However, it briefly mentions the government’s response, which could introduce a slight policy-oriented perspective.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
