ON
← Back to feed
Two boys, 11 and 12, given conditional warnings after breaking into MRT train’s back cabin
SG🏛️ Politics23 days ago

Two boys, 11 and 12, given conditional warnings after breaking into MRT train’s back cabin

Two boys, aged 11 and 12, received conditional warnings after they broke into the back cabin of an MRT train on Singapore's North-South Line in February. They used a tool to open the partition door and pressed a white button multiple times, triggering an onboard alarm. The incident was captured on CCTV and shared widely on social media, with a video receiving over 281,000 views. SMRT Trains confirmed the event occurred on Feb 21 and stated that the train captain reported the breach to their control center. Police investigated and, in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers, decided against prosecution, issuing conditional warnings instead. SMRT emphasized the safety risks posed by unauthorized access to restricted areas.

Two boys, aged 11 and 12, have received conditional warnings after they allegedly entered the restricted back cabin of an MRT train operating on Singapore's North-South Line in early February. This incident has since drawn widespread attention online, with videos of their actions circulating widely on social media platforms. According to reports, the boys used a tool to force open the cabin partition door and then proceeded to press what appeared to be a white button multiple times inside the restricted area. A horn sound is also audible in the video, suggesting some form of alert or warning mechanism was activated during the incident. The footage, originally shared on the singaporevirallsg Instagram page, gained over 281,000 views as of June 30, along with nearly 140 comments and was reposted more than 200 times. The incident reportedly occurred on February 21 when the boys boarded a train on the North-South Line. According to SMRT Trains President Lam Sheau Kai, the unauthorized entry triggered an onboard alarm, prompting the train captain in the front cabin to notify SMRT's Operations Control Centre. Staff at the subsequent station were alerted to investigate the matter, leading to the filing of a police report. The boys were observed exiting the train at the next station, and their actions were captured on CCTV footage. Police confirmed to The Straits Times that a report was filed on February 21 regarding the incident. They stated that the boys were issued conditional warnings under the Rapid Transit System Regulations. This decision followed consultations with the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) after completing investigations and carefully considering the facts and circumstances surrounding the case. It is important to note that the decision to pursue legal action against individuals falls within the purview of the AGC. SMRT Trains emphasized its stance on the seriousness of such incidents. Lam Sheau Kai highlighted that unauthorized access to restricted areas on trains presents substantial safety and security concerns. He noted that these types of reckless behaviors pose dangers not only to those directly involved but could also potentially disrupt train operations, thereby impacting the commuting experience of others. The incident underscores the importance of adhering to safety protocols within public transportation systems. While the boys did not face formal prosecution, the issuance of conditional warnings serves as a cautionary measure aimed at deterring similar occurrences in the future. Such measures reflect a balance between addressing misconduct and providing opportunities for correction without resorting to punitive legal actions. Looking ahead, authorities will likely continue monitoring situations where minors engage in activities that breach established rules within public spaces. Public awareness campaigns might be initiated to reinforce the significance of respecting boundaries and regulations designed to ensure everyone's safety. Additionally, further discussions may arise concerning how best to handle cases involving young offenders while ensuring both accountability and support for rehabilitation efforts.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Straits Times logoThe Straits TimesParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 8823 days ago
Two boys, 11 and 12, given conditional warnings after breaking into MRT train’s back cabin

Two boys, aged 11 and 12, received conditional warnings after they broke into the back cabin of an MRT train on Singapore's North-South Line in February. They used a tool to open the partition door and pressed a white button multiple times, triggering an onboard alarm. The incident was captured on CCTV and shared widely on social media, with a video receiving over 281,000 views. SMRT Trains confirmed the event occurred on Feb 21 and stated that the train captain reported the breach to their control center. Police investigated and, in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers, decided against prosecution, issuing conditional warnings instead. SMRT emphasized the safety risks posed by unauthorized access to restricted areas.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the incident, including quotes from SMRT and the police, without overtly favoring any side. It provides context about the legal outcome and emphasizes the safety concerns raised by SMRT, but does not exhibit clear ideological bias or loaded language.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 88): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the incident, including dates, actions of the boys, and official responses. It references multiple sources like SMRT Trains and police. Objectivity is slightly lower due to some emotionally charged language describing the boys' actions as 'forcefu

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories