ON
← Back to feed
Türkiye plans privatization of 2 Istanbul bridges, highways
TR🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/6/2026

Türkiye plans privatization of 2 Istanbul bridges, highways

Turkey has announced plans to privatize the operating rights of two major Istanbul bridges, the July 15 Martyrs Bridge and the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge, as part of a broader privatization program that also includes several highways such as the Nigde-Pozantı, Gaziantep Ring Motorway, and sections of the Bursa Ring Road. The initiative, outlined in a presidential decree published in the Official Gazette, allows for the transfer of operating rights for up to 30 years, with state ownership retained. This follows previous attempts to privatize the bridges over a decade ago, which were abandoned due to concerns over the competitiveness of bids. The Privatization Administration emphasized that the move does not involve the sale of public assets but rather the delegation of operational responsibilities to private entities to alleviate budgetary pressures. The government aims to shift costs associated with infrastructure maintenance and operations to operators, thereby reducing financial strain on public funds.

Türkiye plans to privatize the operation of two major Istanbul bridges, July 15 Martyrs Bridge and Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge, as part of a broader initiative involving several highways, according to a presidential decree published in the Official Gazette on September 5. The program allows for the transfer of 30-year operating rights, with the state retaining ownership. Included are the Nigde-Pozantı Motorway, Gaziantep Ring Motorway, and the Çağlayan Junction-Yenişehir Junction section of the Bursa Ring Road. The privatization plan permits the bridges and highways to be offered either as a unified package or in separate groups. This marks a shift from a 2010 decision that aimed to privatize them as a single unit under a 25-year operating agreement. The new approach extends the operating period to 30 years and introduces flexibility in how the assets are structured. The Privatization Administration (OIB) stated in a written response that the initiative does not involve the sale of public assets. Instead, it focuses on transferring operating rights for a defined time frame, maintaining state ownership. The OIB clarified that the model aims to reduce financial strain on the government by shifting operational costs to private operators. Earlier reports indicated that Ankara was considering privatizing some infrastructure projects to alleviate budget pressures. Transport and Infrastructure Minister Abdulkadir Uraloğlu noted that the goal is to examine granting operating rights for specific periods and transferring associated costs to operators to avoid additional fiscal burden. The move follows previous attempts to sell operating rights for the Istanbul bridges over a decade ago, which were abandoned due to concerns over the competitiveness of bids. The current plan seeks to address past challenges by adjusting terms and offering greater flexibility in implementation.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Daily Sabah logoDaily SabahParty-alignedCenterFactual 98Objective 969/6/2026
Türkiye plans privatization of 2 Istanbul bridges, highways

Turkey has announced plans to privatize the operating rights of two major Istanbul bridges, the July 15 Martyrs Bridge and the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge, as part of a broader privatization program that also includes several highways such as the Nigde-Pozantı, Gaziantep Ring Motorway, and sections of the Bursa Ring Road. The initiative, outlined in a presidential decree published in the Official Gazette, allows for the transfer of operating rights for up to 30 years, with state ownership retained. This follows previous attempts to privatize the bridges over a decade ago, which were abandoned due to concerns over the competitiveness of bids. The Privatization Administration emphasized that the move does not involve the sale of public assets but rather the delegation of operational responsibilities to private entities to alleviate budgetary pressures. The government aims to shift costs associated with infrastructure maintenance and operations to operators, thereby reducing financial strain on public funds.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the privatization plan as a government-led initiative without overtly criticizing or praising the policy. It provides factual information about the scope, timeline, and rationale behind the decision, citing official sources such as the presidential decree and statements from the

Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports the details of the privatization plan, including the specific bridges and highways involved, the extension of the operating period from 25 to 30 years, and the clarification that ownership remains with the state. It also references the 2010 attempt and provides context

Why objectivity (96): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, avoiding any overt bias or emotional language. It quotes the official statement from the Privatization Administration and provides background context without taking a stance on the policy itself.

Hurriyet Daily News logoHurriyet Daily NewsParty-alignedCenterFactual 97Objective 949/6/2026
Türkiye plans 30-year privatization of Bosphorus bridges, highways

Turkey has announced a new decision to privatize the operation of two Bosphorus bridges in Istanbul, along with several highways and road networks, over a 30-year period. This follows a 2010 plan that originally aimed for a 25-year privatization period. The updated presidential decree allows these infrastructure projects to be privatized either as a single package or in separate segments. The Privatization Administration clarified that this does not involve selling public assets, but rather transferring operating rights for a defined time frame while maintaining state ownership.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a government decision without overtly positive or negative language. It explains the policy change and quotes the Privatization Administration to clarify the nature of the initiative. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the story.

Why factuality (97): This article aligns closely with the cross-source consensus, accurately reporting the key elements of the privatization plan, such as the inclusion of the Bosphorus bridges, the extension of the operating period to 30 years, and the clarification that no public assets are being sold. It mentions the

Why objectivity (94): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting facts without overtly favoring one perspective. However, the headline uses the phrase 'privatization of Bosphorus bridges, highways,' which might imply a stronger emphasis on the privatization aspect compared to other articles. This slight fra

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories