The Vintgar Tourist Board is proposing a concession
The tourist association for Vintgar Gorge proposes that the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning manage natural values like Vintgar through a concession system. This approach would clarify the conditions under which Vintgar is managed, including rights, responsibilities, and relationships between the managing entity, the state, and the local community. The current management model involves collecting entrance fees at Vintgar, Savica Falls, and Mostnica Gorge, which are then distributed by the Public Institute Triglav National Park based on work done and expenses incurred. The Vintgar Gorge is managed by the Tourist Association Gorje, which celebrates its 80th anniversary this year. The association believes the recent changes to the Nature Conservation Act are moving in the right direction but face organizational challenges. They suggest that if legal clarity and practical feasibility are not ensured, the law may need correction. The director of Vintgar Gorge, Bojan Traven, emphasizes that managing such a popular site requires consistent daily effort and that the new law is difficult to implement due to the unique nature of each natural value.
Vintgar is at the center of a dispute over management responsibilities, with conflicting proposals for its future. The Turistično društvo Gorje has proposed a concession model, while the Triglavski narodni park (TNP) announced a new tender for a caretaker agreement. The disagreement stems from differing views on who should manage the site, collect entrance fees, and bear responsibility for visitors. The issue has been fueled by financial disputes, unclear legal statuses, and long-standing tensions among local authorities, the national park, and the tourism association. Soteska Vintgar, one of Slovenia’s most visited natural attractions, has been a point of contention for years. The tourism association Gorje now proposes a concession as a long-term solution. “We need to move from conflict to regulation,” said Janez Poklukar, president of TD Gorje, during the proposal presentation. However, perspectives among the state, municipality, and the association differ significantly. The dispute involves multiple stakeholders, including the state, the public entity TNP, the Municipality of Gorje, and the Tourism Association Gorje. TD Gorje has a long tradition of managing the area, having opened it to visitors in 1893. The current association celebrates its 80th anniversary this year. TD Gorje describes the conflict as four-year-old, while the municipality claims the issues have been unresolved for much longer. Mayor Peter Torkar noted that the municipality first raised concerns about management with the state in 2014. Tensions escalated physically in February, when the municipality installed gates at the entrance to the site after Torkar pointed out that the lack of clear legal status made it uncertain who was responsible for visitor safety. An inspection process revealed that the association had been collecting entrance fees illegally, though the Ministry of Natural Resources and Spatial Planning partially supported the association’s arguments. The process did not yield a definitive ruling on whether the association operated unlawfully. A key change came with the amendment to the Law on Nature Protection, which took effect in December 2025. Under the new rules, visits to natural values are free unless special infrastructure, security measures, or high visitor numbers justify charges. Funds collected primarily cover necessary costs, with 75% going to the protected area manager and 25% to local communities. A transitional agreement reached in April assigned entrance fees to the TNP, which then paid services to TD Gorje or its affiliated companies. The TNP thus acts as the legal manager, while the association handles practical operations. In July 2025, the TNP launched a two-year tender for a caretaker contract. The company 3com.si submitted a revision request, which was rejected by the State Revision Commission on December 2nd. The commission found the tender subject too vaguely defined and issues with the qualifications of applicants, staff conditions, and proof of professional competence. There was also a notable difference between local actors. The Soteska Vintgar company, established by TD Gorje, offered service execution for €599,994 per year, slightly less than €1.2 million over two years. The municipality proposed taking over the task for free, citing guaranteed funds. The TNP then announced a new tender for selecting a caretaker. Article 48 of the Nature Protection Act provides the legal basis for such agreements, allowing the signing of a caretaking contract for specific protection tasks. Financial considerations remain highly contentious. From April to mid-June, more than 70,000 visitors entered Vintgar, generating approximately €600,000 in revenue.
The article discusses the ongoing dispute over the management of Vintgar, a popular Slovenian natural landmark, between the state, the Triglav National Park (TNP), the Municipality of Gorje, and the Tourism Association Gorje (TD Gorje). The conflict centers around who should manage the site, who can charge entrance fees, and who bears responsibility. TD Gorje proposes a concession as a long-term solution, while TNP has announced a new tender for a caretaker agreement. The disagreement includes differing views on costs, entrance fees, and responsibilities, with tensions escalating physically when the municipality installed barriers at the entrance in February. A recent law change in December 2025 aims to clarify rules regarding access to nature areas, allowing charges under specific conditions. A transitional agreement was reached in April 2025, assigning entrance fees to TNP, which then pays services to TD Gorje. However, TNP recently canceled the tender for a caretaker contract.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the conflicting interests among multiple stakeholders, state, national park, municipality, and tourism association, with no clear ideological leaning. It reports on the legal and administrative complexities without overtly favoring any side, focusing on factual,
Why factuality (80): This article accurately reports the proposal by Turistično društvo Gorje for a concession and contrasts it with the Triglav National Park’s plan for a new management contract. It includes relevant historical context, quotes from Janez Poklukar, and references the ongoing disputes involving the munic
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both the position of Turistično društvo Gorje and the potential concerns of the state and local authorities. While it highlights the community’s perspective, it does not overly favor any single party, maintaining a fair and neutral approach overall.
The tourist association for Vintgar Gorge proposes that the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning manage natural values like Vintgar through a concession system. This approach would clarify the conditions under which Vintgar is managed, including rights, responsibilities, and relationships between the managing entity, the state, and the local community. The current management model involves collecting entrance fees at Vintgar, Savica Falls, and Mostnica Gorge, which are then distributed by the Public Institute Triglav National Park based on work done and expenses incurred. The Vintgar Gorge is managed by the Tourist Association Gorje, which celebrates its 80th anniversary this year. The association believes the recent changes to the Nature Conservation Act are moving in the right direction but face organizational challenges. They suggest that if legal clarity and practical feasibility are not ensured, the law may need correction. The director of Vintgar Gorge, Bojan Traven, emphasizes that managing such a popular site requires consistent daily effort and that the new law is difficult to implement due to the unique nature of each natural value.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, those of the Tourist Association Gorje advocating for a concession model and concerns raised by the director of Vintgar Gorge regarding the implementation of the new Nature Conservation Act. It does not favor one side over the other and provides balanced quotes
Why factuality (75): The article provides factual information about the proposal by Turistično društvo Gorje for a concession to manage Soteska Vintgar, citing examples like Postojnska Jama and Sečoveljske soline. It also mentions the financial flow from entrance fees to the Triglav National Park and the role of Turisti
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the situation in a relatively neutral manner, quoting statements from Janez Poklukar and providing background on the conflict between the local community, the municipality, and the national park authority. The tone remains objective, though there is a slight emphasis on the comm
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
