ON
← Back to feed
After a holiday in Croatia, they were fined €3,000: "It's inhuman"
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives14 hr. ago

After a holiday in Croatia, they were fined €3,000: "It's inhuman"

Polish tourists visiting Dubrovnik by car are facing significant fines after entering a traffic-restricted zone around the historic city center, with some receiving penalties totaling up to 3,000 euros months or over a year after their trips. The restrictions, introduced on June 2, 2025, aim to reduce congestion and protect the UNESCO-listed old town from heavy vehicle traffic. While the base fine for unauthorized entry is 260 euros for individuals, costs can escalate significantly due to procedural fees and multiple violations, leading to total demands exceeding 1,500 euros per incident. City authorities reported approximately 1,700 violations within the first ten days of enforcement, noting particular issues with taxi companies sending multiple vehicles into the restricted area. Critics argue that the delayed notification process and high financial burden make the penalties disproportionate, while the city maintains that strict enforcement is necessary to manage visitor numbers.

Polish tourists returning from holidays in Croatia are facing fines totaling thousands of euros for unauthorized entry into a traffic-restricted zone in Dubrovnik. The backlash has intensified after several visitors received penalty notices months or even more than a year after their trips ended. One tourist told the Croatian portal Index that he received two separate fines of 1,500 euros each for two unpermitted entries, amounting to a total debt of 3,000 euros. He described the situation as inhumane, noting that the notifications arrived long after his vacation had concluded. The special traffic regime around the historic city center was introduced on June 2, 2025. Local authorities implemented the measure to reduce traffic congestion and protect the old town and its surroundings, which have been heavily burdened by high numbers of visitors and vehicles. Access is permitted only to vehicles meeting specific conditions, including those with appropriate permits. Visitors with reserved parking or accommodation may enter if they complete a required prior procedure. Traffic signs, traffic lights, and electronic warning displays mark the entrances to the restricted area. Cameras monitor access points and recognize license plates to record violations. City officials stated that approximately 1,700 violators were recorded in the first ten days following the implementation of the new rules. The data highlights that individual drivers are not the only ones penalized. In one instance, a taxi company accumulated 61 unauthorized entries. Authorities announced penalties totaling 96,380 euros for both the company and the responsible individual. While officials emphasized that the goal is to improve residents' quality of life and reduce traffic load rather than to punish drivers, critics argue the enforcement is aggressive. The base fine for an unauthorized entry by a private individual is set at 260 euros. For craftsmen or individuals performing independent activities, the fine is 660 euros. Legal entities face a fine of 1,320 euros, and a responsible person within such an entity can receive an additional 260 euro penalty. Crucially, each unauthorized entry is counted as a separate offense. Consequently, amounts accumulate if a driver enters the zone multiple times. When procedural costs are added, the final obligation for a single violation can exceed 1,500 euros. Dissatisfaction among Polish travelers has spread across major media outlets, including Onet, Fakt, Rzeczpospolita, and Interia. Many tourists report receiving payment demands at their home addresses that include these substantial sums. A key source of frustration is the difficulty in communicating with the law firms hired by municipal authorities to handle the cases. Tourists claim these offices do not respond to electronic messages, making it hard to seek clarification or resolve disputes. Some visitors noted that while traffic signs exist, they do not explain clearly enough to foreigners exactly what steps are necessary for legal entry into the zone. One Polish journalist shared a photo of a fine notice for 1,505 euros for entering the zone without permission, using it as a warning to others. Another social media user highlighted that fines could reach up to 6,000 zlotys for unauthorized entry. The incident has sparked debate over whether the signage and digital infrastructure adequately inform international visitors. Despite the criticism, local authorities maintain that the restrictions are essential for managing the heavy traffic flow in the historic district. The case continues to draw attention to the complexities of navigating local regulations while traveling abroad.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Žurnal24 logoŽurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 9014 hr. ago
After a holiday in Croatia, they were fined €3,000: "It's inhuman"

Polish tourists visiting Dubrovnik by car are facing significant fines after entering a traffic-restricted zone around the historic city center, with some receiving penalties totaling up to 3,000 euros months or over a year after their trips. The restrictions, introduced on June 2, 2025, aim to reduce congestion and protect the UNESCO-listed old town from heavy vehicle traffic. While the base fine for unauthorized entry is 260 euros for individuals, costs can escalate significantly due to procedural fees and multiple violations, leading to total demands exceeding 1,500 euros per incident. City authorities reported approximately 1,700 violations within the first ten days of enforcement, noting particular issues with taxi companies sending multiple vehicles into the restricted area. Critics argue that the delayed notification process and high financial burden make the penalties disproportionate, while the city maintains that strict enforcement is necessary to manage visitor numbers.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of tourist grievances, using terms like 'outraged' and quoting complaints about the measures being 'inhumane.' It emphasizes the delay in notification and the difficulty in communicating with municipal lawyers, highlighting the administrative burden on a

Why factuality (95): This article provides a very precise summary of the primary source. It correctly details the fine amounts for different categories of offenders (individuals, sole proprietors, legal entities), the cumulative nature of the fines, and the specific timeline of the complaints. It attributes information

Why objectivity (90): The writing style is neutral and informative. It presents the tourists' grievances and the administrative details without injecting strong editorial opinion or emotionally charged adjectives beyond what is necessary to convey the reported situation. It balances the complaint with the factual explana

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 92Objective 8521 hr. ago
Tourists outraged by fines in Dubrovnik: "You come for a holiday, but you get 3,000 euros in fines"

Tourists visiting Dubrovnik are facing high fines for entering restricted traffic zones around the old town. Many visitors have received fines that arrive at their home addresses months or even years after their trip has ended, causing significant frustration. Polish tourists, in particular, have been vocal about the excessive amounts, with some receiving fines totaling up to €3000 for two separate violations. The city introduced the special traffic regime to reduce congestion and protect historical areas, using cameras to record license plates at entrances. However, tourists report unclear signage and poor communication from local authorities, including non-responses from hired legal offices. Local officials emphasize that the goal is improving quality of life for residents rather than imposing penalties.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights the negative impact of strict enforcement policies on tourists, emphasizing the frustration and financial burden placed on them. It critiques the lack of clear communication and responsiveness from local authorities, suggesting a failure in governance and public service. While

Why factuality (92): The article accurately reflects the primary source regarding the specific case of the Polish tourist receiving two fines totaling 3000 euros, the delay in notification, and the breakdown of fines for legal entities versus individuals. It correctly cites the Index report and mentions the involvement

Why objectivity (85): The tone is largely journalistic but uses slightly emotive language such as 'shock' and quotes the tourist's complaint about 'greed'. While this mirrors the sentiment in the source material, the framing leans towards highlighting the negative experience of tourists rather than providing a balanced v

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories