ON
← Back to feed
Islamic Charity in Britain Accused of Funnelling Money and Goods to Hamas Leaders: Report
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives14 days ago

Islamic Charity in Britain Accused of Funnelling Money and Goods to Hamas Leaders: Report

An American FBI indictment alleges that the Al-Khair Foundation, a major British Muslim charity led by Mohammad Yousef Hasna, funneled funds and goods to Hamas leaders in Palestine. According to the indictment, Hasna used the charity to raise money and send 'truckloads' of supplies to Gaza under the guise of humanitarian aid, while manipulating documentation to hide Hamas's role. One of the charity's workers was reportedly killed by Israeli forces in 2024 while serving with Hamas. The charity's donations nearly doubled after the October 7 Hamas attacks, reaching £74.79 million annually. Investigations by the Metropolitan Police and Charity Commission have begun, and Hasna faces extradition to the U.S. Critics, including Professor Matt Goodwin, accuse the charity of enabling terrorism through state funding, while the charity denies wrongdoing.

Islamic Charity in Britain Accused of Funnelling Funds and Goods to Hamas Leaders British authorities have begun investigating a major Islamic charity, the Al-Khair Foundation, after it was accused by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of acting as a conduit for financial and material support to Hamas, the Palestinian militant group designated as a terrorist organization by several governments. According to an indictment reviewed by the London-based newspaper Daily Telegraph, Mohammad Yousef Hasna, the global director of the Al-Khair Foundation, is alleged to have used his position within the UK’s largest Muslim charity to raise funds and provide financing and commodities to Hamas leaders. The FBI alleges that Hasna communicated with individuals at the highest levels of Hamas, including Ghazi Hamad, discussing how the charity could be leveraged to fund the terror group. The indictment states that Hasna helped procure and transport goods to Gaza, with evidence suggesting that “truckloads” of supplies were sent under the guise of humanitarian aid for Palestinians. To conceal these activities, the indictment claims that Hasna manipulated photographs and documents to mislead the public and potential donors about the true beneficiaries of the charity’s fundraising efforts. One of the charity’s employees, Hossam Mansour, was reportedly killed in 2024 by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) while serving as a platoon commander for Hamas. This incident has added to the controversy surrounding the charity’s operations and its alleged ties to militant groups. The Al-Khair Foundation, which the FBI refers to as the “Sham Charity,” saw a dramatic increase in donations following the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel. Annual contributions rose from £31.28 million ($42 million) to £74.79 million ($101 million), positioning it among the largest Islamic charities in the UK. In addition to its aid work in the Middle East, the foundation runs multiple Islamic schools in the United Kingdom and has reportedly collaborated with the British government on initiatives aimed at combating perceived hatred toward Muslims. The charity has also utilized the British Gift Aid tax relief program to reclaim £9 million ($12 million) in taxes over the past five years. Following the allegations, both the Metropolitan Police and the Charity Commission have initiated investigations into the organization, which has now been placed under restrictions requiring Commission approval before it can spend funds. Mohammad Yousef Hasna was recently arrested by the National Crime Agency, Britain’s counterpart to the FBI, and faces extradition to the United States. The case has sparked broader concerns about the oversight of Islamic charities operating in the UK and the mechanisms in place to ensure transparency and accountability. Professor Matt Goodwin, a supporter of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, criticized the situation, stating that “suicidal empathy” allows charities to receive state funding while channeling resources to groups that seek to undermine Western interests. He argued that such actions highlight flaws in the current system for vetting charitable organizations. In response, the Al-Khair Foundation denied the allegations, asserting that it is a humanitarian organization established in 2003 and registered in the UK. The charity emphasized its commitment to ethical practices and stated that Hasna was employed by one of its implementing partners. It reiterated its dedication to using donor funds for their intended humanitarian purposes and maintaining the integrity of its operations.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 55Objective 4014 days ago
Islamic Charity in Britain Accused of Funnelling Money and Goods to Hamas Leaders: Report

An American FBI indictment alleges that the Al-Khair Foundation, a major British Muslim charity led by Mohammad Yousef Hasna, funneled funds and goods to Hamas leaders in Palestine. According to the indictment, Hasna used the charity to raise money and send 'truckloads' of supplies to Gaza under the guise of humanitarian aid, while manipulating documentation to hide Hamas's role. One of the charity's workers was reportedly killed by Israeli forces in 2024 while serving with Hamas. The charity's donations nearly doubled after the October 7 Hamas attacks, reaching £74.79 million annually. Investigations by the Metropolitan Police and Charity Commission have begun, and Hasna faces extradition to the U.S. Critics, including Professor Matt Goodwin, accuse the charity of enabling terrorism through state funding, while the charity denies wrongdoing.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the allegations against the Al-Khair Foundation in a manner consistent with right-wing narratives, emphasizing the threat posed by Islamic charities and criticizing their alignment with groups like Hamas. The language suggests a broader concern about national security and the vet­

Why factuality (55): The article cites an FBI indictment obtained by the Daily Telegraph, which is a reputable news source. However, the article does not provide direct access to the original indictment or primary source documentation, so verification is limited. The claims about the charity funneling funds and goods to

Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'funneling money and goods to Hamas terrorists' and 'obfuscate the true nature of his purportedly humanitarian work.' It frames the charity in a negative light without presenting counterpoints or alternative perspectives. The language suggests a

RealClearPolitics logoRealClearPoliticsIndependentConservativeFactual 30Objective 2516 days ago
Trump Won the Iran War

A veteran national security expert claims that former President Donald Trump's policies toward Iran have led to significant changes in the Middle East. The expert points to several developments, including Hamas disarming, $60 billion in Iraq-related agreements, and the formation of a Saudi-led coalition in the Red Sea, as evidence of these changes. These outcomes are presented as results of Trump's approach to Iran, suggesting a shift in regional dynamics.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the argument through the lens of a 'veteran national security expert,' which often aligns with conservative perspectives. The framing emphasizes positive outcomes attributed to Trump's policies, using terms like 'delivering a remade Middle East' and implying success without crit

Why factuality (30): This article makes a broad claim that 'Trump won the Iran War' without providing specific evidence or citing any primary sources. It references vague statements like 'Hamas disarming' and '$60 billion in Iraq deals,' which lack substantiation. The article fails to define what constitutes 'winning th

Why objectivity (25): The article is highly subjective and uses loaded language such as 'receipts are in' and 'delivering a remade Middle East.' It presents a one-sided narrative favoring Trump's policies without acknowledging opposing viewpoints or critical analysis. The tone is promotional and lacks neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories