The U.S. administration has shifted its trade strategy from temporary measures to a more entrenched approach, with new tariffs being imposed on over 80 countries. These tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, effectively replace the previous 10% global duty that was set to expire. This move marks a continuation of President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies, even as legal challenges persist. The latest tariffs were announced by Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. This provision allows the U.S. to impose tariffs on goods from countries engaging in unfair trade practices, particularly those involving forced labor. Greer emphasized that the U.S. has maintained a forced labor import ban for nearly a century and urged trading partners to follow suit. She expressed encouragement toward countries that have already adopted similar prohibitions and looked forward to ensuring their enforcement. The imposition of these tariffs has drawn sharp criticism from several countries, including Australia, Brazil, and Norway, which argue that the measures lack justification. The European Union, represented by its foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, stated that the bloc had honored commitments under a transatlantic trade agreement and viewed the new tariffs as a surprise. Canada, a key U.S. ally and one of its largest trading partners, condemned the targeting of its economy, stating that it had taken a leading role in opposing the importation of goods made with forced labor. Canadian officials suggested that a coordinated multilateral effort would be more appropriate than unilateral action. This latest round of tariffs follows a series of actions by the Trump administration, including the imposition of a 10% tariff under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act in April. However, this policy faced legal hurdles when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in February that Congress retains the authority to levy taxes, thereby limiting the scope of presidential powers in this area. In response, the administration introduced a new 10% tariff regime under a different statute, which was valid for only 150 days and expired shortly after midnight on Friday. The current tariffs under Section 301 represent a more sustained effort compared to previous measures. According to analyses by institutions like the Brookings Institution, Section 301 has been used relatively infrequently. Alan Wolff, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, noted the potential implications of increased reliance on this provision. In parallel, Trump has vowed to investigate the European Union over fines imposed on major U.S. tech companies. He accused the EU of robbing American companies and taxpayers, threatening a substantial tariff as a result. The European Commission recently fined Google €890 million for anti-competitive behavior, prompting Trump to declare that the EU would face a "very big price." He cited additional fines against Apple, Meta, and Amazon, though the exact origins of these figures remain unclear. Google’s spokesperson, José Castañeda, acknowledged the company’s efforts to comply with the Digital Markets Act but raised concerns about the impact of recent European Commission decisions. Representatives of Meta, Apple, and Amazon, as well as the European Commission, have yet to respond publicly to Trump’s claims. Meanwhile, the ongoing tensions highlight the broader geopolitical and economic stakes involved in U.S.-EU trade relations.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
United Kingdom
