Trump slams new book about presidency by NYT reporters, alleges it’s ‘mostly made up’

President Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on a forthcoming book co-authored by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, calling it "mostly made up" and "Fake News." In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump criticized the book's authors, accusing them of fabricating information and misleading readers. He specifically singled out Haberman, labeling her a "third-rate writer and intellect," while praising her financial success due to her coverage of his presidency. Trump claimed that Haberman was incorrect about several major issues, including the outcome of the 2016 election, the Russia investigation, and other aspects of his tenure.

The book, titled *Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump*, is expected to reveal significant insights into the Trump administration's inner workings. According to excerpts shared by the authors, the book discusses internal deliberations within the administration regarding controversial policies such as the potential suspension of habeas corpus, strategies for dealing with the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, and Trump's personal vendettas against political opponents. These revelations have sparked considerable interest and speculation among political analysts and the public alike.

The book features direct quotes from several high-ranking figures within the Trump administration, including Vice President Mike Pence, Acting Attorney General Todd Blaine, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and Communications Director Steven Cheung. These quotes reportedly come from a closed-door meeting held in the Situation Room, where discussions about handling the Epstein case took place. Some observers have speculated that the reporters may have accessed audio recordings of this meeting, given the detailed nature of the quotes included in the book. However, neither Haberman nor Swan has confirmed or denied whether they were granted access to such materials.

Both journalists are well-established in the field of political reporting, having covered the Trump administration extensively over the past several years. Haberman, known for her work on the Trump campaign and White House, has frequently appeared in print and television media, offering analysis and commentary on key developments. Swan, a former reporter for *The Hill*, has also contributed to numerous publications, providing insight into the inner workings of the Trump administration.

The controversy surrounding the book has raised concerns among some members of the administration. For instance, Vice President Pence expressed worries about the potential release of sensitive information, particularly if audio recordings were involved. Such fears underscore the sensitivity of the topics being explored in the book and the broader implications of publishing insider accounts of a former president's administration.

As the publication date of the book approaches, anticipation remains high among both supporters and critics of Trump. While the administration has yet to issue a formal response, the ongoing scrutiny highlights the complex relationship between former presidents and the media, especially when it comes to documenting historical events. The book's anticipated release could further fuel debates about the accuracy of political reporting and the ethical boundaries of investigative journalism. With these tensions simmering, the coming weeks will likely see increased attention on the book's contents and its impact on public perception of the Trump presidency.