ON
← Back to feed
Trump scraps plans to live stream firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Trump scraps plans to live stream firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter

Former U.S. President Donald Trump had initially proposed live-streaming the execution of Nidal Hasan, the perpetrator of the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, which killed 13 people and injured many others. This plan faced significant opposition both domestically and internationally, with human rights activists condemning it as inhumane and inappropriate. The decision to abandon the live-streaming aspect of the execution reflects broader concerns about the ethical implications of publicly broadcasting such events. The controversy highlights ongoing debates over capital punishment and the role of media in covering executions.

U.S. President Donald Trump has cancelled plans to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, the former U.S. Army major who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. The decision follows intense domestic and international opposition to the proposal, which had been championed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Trump confirmed the change in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, stating that Hasan would still face execution by firing squad on 3 December but that the event would not be broadcast. The move marks a rare public divergence between Trump and Hegseth, a close ally of the president. While Trump acknowledged that streaming the execution might serve as a deterrent for potential terrorists, he noted that many individuals preferred not to witness such an event. Families of the victims will still have the option to attend the execution in person, according to Trump. The planned livestream sparked widespread condemnation from various quarters. The United Nations described it as "torture," while the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops called it a "barbaric promotion of a culture of death." Both Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak labeled the idea "abhorrent." Vice President JD Vance, whose recent memoir focused on his Catholic faith, stated he would not watch the execution if it proceeded. Public sentiment largely opposed the plan. A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll revealed that eight in 10 Americans were against livestreaming the execution. Lawmakers from both major U.S. political parties voiced concerns, with top House Republican Mike Johnson warning it could become a "recruiting tool for future terrorists." Dozens of retired U.S. military officers also issued an open letter opposing the broadcast, arguing it could tarnish the military's reputation and elevate Hasan to the status of a martyr. Hasan, who was paralyzed from the waist down during his arrest, was convicted of premeditated murder in a military trial. He was found guilty of killing 13 unarmed soldiers and wounding 32 others in a 2009 shooting at Fort Hood. His defense team did not comment on the cancellation of the livestream, and it remained unclear whether the execution date would be affected by any legal challenges. Hegseth had argued that broadcasting the execution would help convey the seriousness of the consequences for such acts. However, as criticism mounted, Trump appeared to distance himself from the plan, despite earlier indications of support. A Pentagon spokesperson confirmed that Hegseth had consulted with Trump prior to the decision and emphasized that both were "completely aligned." The cancellation comes amid broader scrutiny of capital punishment in the U.S., particularly after a recent incident in Tennessee involving a failed execution attempt. Meanwhile, Trump has reiterated his stance on the death penalty, expressing a desire for it to apply to anyone who kills a firefighter. Hasan's execution, if carried out, would mark the first U.S. military firing squad execution since 1945. It is part of a larger global context, with Amnesty International reporting at least 17 public executions worldwide in 2025, including six in Afghanistan and 11 in Iran. The event underscores ongoing debates around justice, deterrence, and the ethical implications of public executions.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenteryesterday
Trump scraps plans to live stream firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter

Former U.S. President Donald Trump had initially proposed live-streaming the execution of Nidal Hasan, the perpetrator of the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, which killed 13 people and injured many others. This plan faced significant opposition both domestically and internationally, with human rights activists condemning it as inhumane and inappropriate. The decision to abandon the live-streaming aspect of the execution reflects broader concerns about the ethical implications of publicly broadcasting such events. The controversy highlights ongoing debates over capital punishment and the role of media in covering executions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement regarding Trump's proposal and the subsequent opposition without taking a clear stance or using biased language. It mentions the opposition and condemnation but does not favor one side over another in its presentation.

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenteryesterday
Trump says gunman's execution will not be livestreamed

US President Donald Trump decided against livestreaming the execution of a former Army major responsible for killing 13 people at Fort Hood. This decision came after he overruled Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, as the proposal faced opposition from Republicans, religious leaders, and the general public.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the event without apparent bias. It mentions the involvement of high-profile figures such as the US President and Pentagon chief, but does not show favoritism towards any side. The decision made by Trump is reported neutrally, with no indication of approval,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories