Trump’s teleprompter aide allegedly made $US100,000 betting on his speeches

The Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenter9 hr. ago

A man who operated Donald Trump's teleprompter, Gabriel Perez, has been placed on unpaid leave after allegations surfaced that he made over $100,000 in profits through prediction markets based on the content of Trump's speeches. Perez, who has worked with Trump since 2016, reportedly placed bets on multiple speeches, including the State of the Union and addresses at the World Economic Forum. Prediction market firm Kalshi detected unusual trading patterns and alerted regulators, leading to an investigation. The White House confirmed the allegations and stated that Perez violated Kalshi's policies against insider trading. His earnings remain frozen, and no other White House staff are currently under investigation for similar conduct.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, citing both the allegations and the White House's response without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the White House press secretary and details from Kalshi, providing balanced coverage of the incident.

The AgeIndependentCenter9 hr. ago

A White House employee, Gabriel Perez, who served as Donald Trump's teleprompter operator since 2016, has been placed on unpaid administrative leave after allegations that he made over $100,000 by placing bets on prediction markets based on Trump's speeches. The betting occurred on multiple high-profile speeches, including the State of the Union and addresses at the World Economic Forum. Prediction market company Kalshi detected unusual trading patterns and alerted regulators, leading to an investigation that identified Perez. The White House confirmed the allegations and stated that Perez complied with regulatory actions, though the money from his account remains frozen. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt described the situation as 'deeply unfortunate' and emphasized the administration's strict ethical standards.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the allegations and responses from both the White House and Kalshi without overtly favoring either side. While the issue involves a political figure and potential ethics violations, the reporting does not exhibit clear ideological slant. The framing is balanced between the White