ON
← Back to feed
Trump’s team admits Hormuz crisis is permanent – and the UK will suffer
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Trump’s team admits Hormuz crisis is permanent – and the UK will suffer

An interview with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed that the Trump administration acknowledges the Strait of Hormuz will not return to its pre-conflict status, with Bessent stating that the strait will become 'irrelevant' within two years due to Iranian actions. This admission undermines previous assurances that negotiations with Iran would restore normal oil flows, leading to significant economic implications for the UK and other allies. The revelation challenges prior expectations that the strait would reopen, forcing policymakers like Chancellor John Healey to reconsider economic projections, particularly regarding potential UK recession if the situation persists. Accounting firm EY had previously warned that prolonged closure of the strait could lead to high inflation.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has confirmed that the Strait of Hormuz will not return to its pre-conflict state, marking a dramatic shift in U.S. policy toward Iran. In an interview with Arizona-based NBC affiliate 12News, Bessent acknowledged that the strategic waterway, through which nearly 20 percent of the world’s seaborne oil passes, is effectively irreparable due to Iran’s actions. His remarks represent the first public admission by a high-ranking member of President Donald Trump’s administration that the situation in the region is permanent. Bessent suggested that the Strait of Hormuz will soon lose its significance as a critical energy corridor. According to him, more than half of the energy currently moving through the strait will transition to underground pipelines within the next two years. This transformation, he said, signals a fundamental change in global energy logistics, one that will reshape international trade patterns and geopolitical dynamics. The implications of Bessent’s comments extend far beyond the Middle East. For countries reliant on maritime oil transport, such as the United Kingdom, the outlook appears grim. The UK government had previously assumed that the Strait of Hormuz would eventually reopen, allowing for the resumption of stable oil prices and predictable supply chains. However, Bessent’s statement removes that possibility, forcing policymakers to reassess long-term economic strategies. Chancellor John Healey faces a particularly difficult challenge ahead. With the upcoming Budget speech scheduled for 28 October, the assumption that Hormuz would open in the near future is no longer viable. Economic forecasting firms had warned earlier this year that prolonged closure of the strait could push the UK into recession. Recent projections suggest that if the strait remains closed through the end of 2023, inflation could surge to 6.4 percent by Christmas. If the closure continues past mid-2027, the UK economy might contract by 0.2 percent, a scenario that would severely undermine efforts to stimulate growth. The impact of these developments is not limited to the UK alone. European allies, many of whom depend heavily on oil imports through the Strait of Hormuz, are likely to face similar economic pressures. The ripple effects of the ongoing conflict could lead to higher fuel prices, increased transportation costs, and potential disruptions in food and agricultural supplies, all of which contribute to broader economic instability. Meanwhile, the U.S. military’s ability to maintain pressure on Iran is coming under scrutiny. Reports indicate that American weapons stockpiles are depleting faster than anticipated, raising concerns about the sustainability of current operations. Both China and Russia appear to be capitalizing on this uncertainty, positioning themselves as alternative power centers in the region. In addition to the physical closure of the Strait of Hormuz, Bessent hinted at further economic measures against Iran. Speaking on Newsmax’s Rob Schmitt Tonight program, he stated that the U.S. is prepared to implement sanctions that have “never been seen” in the history of economic isolation. These measures, he claimed, will include intensified financial restrictions and continued blockades in the Strait of Hormuz, preventing goods from entering or exiting Iranian ports. Such statements underscore the deepening divide between the U.S. and Iran, with little indication of a resolution in sight. As the situation evolves, the focus shifts to how global economies will adapt to the new reality of reduced maritime oil transit and heightened geopolitical tensions. The coming months will test the resilience of international markets and the effectiveness of diplomatic efforts aimed at stabilizing the region.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8519 days ago
Oil prices fall amid hopes of US-Iran deal

Oil prices declined as reports emerged that U.S.-Iran negotiations had resumed, with Qatar confirming the talks and the U.S. Treasury Secretary suggesting a deal could occur 'today or tomorrow.' This development alleviated concerns about potential crude supply disruptions that had previously driven prices up. The main U.S. oil contract, West Texas Intermediate, fell by five percent to $76.32 per barrel, while the international benchmark Brent crude dipped below $80 per barrel. Meanwhile, U.S. stock markets showed positive performance, with the Dow Jones rising 1.3% and the S&P 500 reaching an intraday high since June.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about U.S.-Iran negotiations and their impact on oil prices without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It provides balanced reporting on the economic implications of the diplomatic developments, citing market reactions without taking sides. The framing

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the drop in oil prices following news of renewed US-Iran negotiations, citing specific price changes for WTI and Brent crude. It also mentions the rise in US stock indices, aligning with the general consensus from other sources. The only minor deduction comes from not

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. However, phrases like 'eased concerns' and 'positive tailwind' introduce slight subjective interpretation, though they are common in financial reporting.

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6519 days ago
US treasury secretary says Hormuz deal with Iran could happen 'today or tomorrow'

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed optimism that a deal with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz could be reached as early as Wednesday. He stated that such a development would stabilize global energy prices, noting that numerous ships are already passing through the strait despite ongoing tensions. Bessent emphasized the potential positive economic impact of resolving the situation, suggesting that energy prices could decrease, benefiting the global economy.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's statements regarding potential negotiations with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz. While the subject matter involves international relations and geopolitical tensions, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the potential outcomes rather than a偏

Why factuality (75): The article cites Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s comments about potential negotiations with Iran on Hormuz and mentions his optimism about energy prices. These claims are consistent with the general consensus among the other articles, though some details like the exact timeline ('today or tomorr

Why objectivity (65): The article leans slightly toward optimism and presents the U.S. perspective favorably, particularly in emphasizing positive outcomes such as stabilized energy prices. This introduces a subtle bias despite quoting official statements.

iNews logoiNewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 4014 days ago
Trump’s team admits Hormuz crisis is permanent – and the UK will suffer

An interview with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed that the Trump administration acknowledges the Strait of Hormuz will not return to its pre-conflict status, with Bessent stating that the strait will become 'irrelevant' within two years due to Iranian actions. This admission undermines previous assurances that negotiations with Iran would restore normal oil flows, leading to significant economic implications for the UK and other allies. The revelation challenges prior expectations that the strait would reopen, forcing policymakers like Chancellor John Healey to reconsider economic projections, particularly regarding potential UK recession if the situation persists. Accounting firm EY had previously warned that prolonged closure of the strait could lead to high inflation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Trump administration's acknowledgment of the permanent impact of the Hormuz crisis as a negative development, emphasizing the economic risks for the UK and the failure of Trump's foreign policy approach. The tone suggests skepticism toward the Trump administration's ability to

Why factuality (65): The article reports on a statement by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggesting the Strait of Hormuz may not return to its previous state, which is not directly mentioned in the primary source document. The primary source discusses potential inflation impacts based on Hormuz reopening timelines bu

Why objectivity (40): The tone of the article is clearly biased towards portraying the Hormuz situation as a permanent crisis, using phrases like 'Doomsday' and implying negative consequences for the UK. This reflects a political perspective rather than a neutral reporting of facts, lowering objectivity.

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentConservativeFactual 20Objective 1010 days ago
Bessent says US set to apply measures never seen on Iran

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that Washington plans to implement unprecedented economic measures against Iran. During an interview on Newsmax's Rob Schmitt Tonight program, Bessent indicated that additional announcements are expected soon, emphasizing a new level of economic isolation not previously applied to any country. He described these measures as combining 'economic isolation like the world has never seen before' with continued restrictions at the Strait of Hormuz, which would limit trade through Iranian ports.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the planned US measures against Iran as unprecedented and severe, using strong language such as 'never seen' and 'blockade.' The emphasis on economic isolation and control over maritime routes suggests a right-leaning perspective, highlighting the severity of the measures without,

Why factuality (20): The article discusses US measures against Iran and mentions the Strait of Hormuz, but does not reference the EY report or any economic forecasts related to the UK. It lacks connection to the primary source document and provides no relevant data or analysis.

Why objectivity (10): The tone is highly partisan, focusing on US actions against Iran with dramatic language such as 'never seen' and 'blockade.' There is no attempt to present multiple perspectives or balance the narrative.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories