Trump's pardons for Jan. 6 rioters don't apply to D.C. pipe bomb suspect, judge rules

The Washington TimesParty-alignedCenteryesterday

A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump's mass pardons for individuals involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot do not apply to Brian J. Cole Jr., a Virginia man charged with planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican National Committees in Washington, D.C. The judge emphasized that Trump's pardons were limited to those already convicted of crimes related to the riot, while Cole had not been charged at the time. Cole was arrested nearly a year after Trump's pardons and is accused of placing unexploded pipe bombs outside the party headquarters the night before the riot. Prosecutors allege Cole confessed to feeling 'bewildered' by election conspiracy theories and provided information through phone records and other evidence. The judge, appointed by President Joe Biden, noted that Trump had previously promoted false claims about the 2020 election results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal ruling regarding Trump's pardons and their application to Cole's case. It includes both perspectives on Trump's actions and the judicial response, without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal arguments,獄

CBS News (US)IndependentCenteryesterday

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled that the alleged pipe bomber, Brian Cole Jr., is not eligible for President Trump's January 6 pardons, which were limited to those convicted of participating in the Capitol riot. The judge, Amir Ali, rejected Cole's argument that his actions were tied to the Jan. 6 events, noting that he was not convicted of any offense at the time of the pardon and was only charged months later. Cole is accused of planting non-detonated pipe bombs near the RNC and DNC headquarters before the Capitol attack, and he faces additional terrorism charges. The ruling underscores the narrow scope of Trump's pardons, which focused on individuals already convicted of riot-related crimes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced legal analysis of the judicial decision without overt ideological slant. It reports the court's reasoning and the arguments from both sides without favoring either the prosecution or defense. The focus remains on the legal interpretation of the pardon terms ratherthan