President Donald Trump has finally paid E. Jean Carroll more than $5.6 million in a sexual abuse and defamation case, marking the resolution of one legal dispute following the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear his appeal. The payment, totaling $5,625,05.48, including accrued interest, was issued on July 9 after U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered the funds disbursed. The money had been held in a court-controlled investment system throughout the appeals process, which Trump’s legal team attempted to prolong by requesting a delay in payment. Carroll, who alleges that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s, won a landmark verdict in 2023 when a federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The initial award of $5 million grew to over $5.6 million due to interest accumulated during the appeals. The Supreme Court’s decision to deny Trump’s appeal in June 2026 effectively ended the legal challenge, allowing the lower court’s ruling to stand. Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating that the payment represented the jury’s verdict. The case originated in 2019 when Carroll publicly accused Trump of assault during a shopping trip at Bergdorf Goodman. She claimed that Trump forcibly inserted his fingers into her during a private moment in a fitting room. The incident, which occurred around 1996, became the subject of a civil lawsuit filed in 2022. During the trial, Trump did not appear in person, nor did his legal team call any witnesses. A jury of nine members, six men and three women, found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation but rejected the rape claim, citing insufficient evidence of forced genital penetration under New York law. Judge Lewis Kaplan later remarked that New York’s definition of rape was outdated compared to federal standards and noted that Carroll’s allegations were “substantially true.” The jury was presented with evidence suggesting a pattern of behavior by Trump, including testimony from two other women who described instances where Trump allegedly transformed casual interactions into acts of sexual misconduct. An audio clip from the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape, in which Trump boasted about grabbing women’s genitals, was also played for the jury. Carroll’s legal team argued that the case was part of a broader pattern of behavior by Trump, emphasizing that multiple women have come forward with similar allegations. Despite the jury’s findings, Trump has consistently denied the accusations, claiming he does not recognize Carroll and asserts that no wrongdoing occurred. His legal team has framed the case as politically motivated, referring to it as a “Weaponization and Lawfare Case.” While the $5.6 million payment concludes one chapter of the legal battle, another major case remains unresolved. In January 2024, a separate federal jury ruled that Trump defamed Carroll through statements made during his presidency, awarding her $83.3 million. Trump is expected to seek Supreme Court review of that judgment as well, keeping the issue in limbo. For now, Carroll plans to use the $5.6 million to fund her retirement, placing the funds in an interest-bearing account pending the outcome of the ongoing appeal.
4 reports
The Daily WireIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 908 days agoPresident Donald Trump has paid over $5.6 million to E. Jean Carroll following the Supreme Court's refusal to hear his appeal in the 2023 sexual abuse and defamation case. This payment concludes one phase of their legal dispute, though a separate $83 million judgment from a 2024 case remains under appeal. Court documents indicate the funds were released on July 9 after being held in escrow during Trump's appeals. Trump's legal team attempted to delay the payout, but U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled against this, ordering the release of the money. Carroll's attorney stated the payment reflects the jury's verdict from three years ago, which found Trump liable for both sexual assault and defamation. Trump denies the allegations and claims the case was politically motivated. The initial case involved Carroll's claim of sexual assault at a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. A federal jury in May 2023 awarded her $5 million in damages, which increased with interest. The Supreme Court's recent decision not to review the case leaves the lower court's ruling unchanged. Trump plans to continue challenging the outcome. Additionally, a separate lawsuit from January 2024 saw
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legal proceedings involving a former president and a civil lawsuit, without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties' representatives and provides context about the legal processes and outcomes. There is no evident bias,
Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports the release of $5.625 million to E. Jean Carroll, citing the court records and the judge's order. It correctly notes the timeline and the legal arguments from both sides. The article is faithful to the primary source and provides additional context about the case and T
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but includes some statements from Trump's legal team that may introduce a slight bias. While it presents both sides of the argument, the inclusion of quotes from Trump's legal team might subtly influence the reader's perception.
CBS News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 908 days agoE. Jean Carroll was finally awarded $5.62 million in damages by former U.S. President Donald Trump following a 2023 jury ruling that found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The payment, which included interest, came after a three-year legal battle. Carroll initially accused Trump of assault in 2019, alleging the incident occurred in a department store dressing room over three decades prior. The Supreme Court allowed the payment to proceed after rejecting Trump’s appeal. Carroll celebrated the decision on her Substack blog, calling it a victory for all women. Following the ruling, both Carroll’s legal team and Trump’s representatives engaged in disputes over the timing of the payment.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the factual outcome of a legal case involving a high-profile political figure without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both the plaintiff and her attorney, provides background on the legal process, and explains the court's reasoning. There is no clear
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports the release of $5.62 million to E. Jean Carroll, citing the court records and the judge's order. It correctly notes the timeline and the legal arguments from both sides. The article is faithful to the primary source and provides additional context about the case and Tr
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the facts but includes a quote from Trump's legal team that may introduce a subtle bias. The tone is generally neutral, but the inclusion of the quote from Trump's legal team might slightly influence the reader's perception, reducing the overall objectivity score.
The HillIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 858 days agoE. Jean Carroll, a writer, has received a $5.62 million payment from former U.S. President Donald Trump three years after a jury ruled him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The verdict was reached by a unanimous nine-person jury, according to Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan. The payment comes after a legal battle that concluded in favor of Carroll, who alleged that Trump had sexually assaulted her and defamed her publicly. The case was part of a broader set of legal challenges involving Trump, including other allegations of sexual misconduct. The settlement marks a significant financial resolution for Carroll following the court's decision.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding a legal ruling against a high-profile political figure without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on the outcome of a court case and the subsequent payment, maintaining neutrality in tone and content.
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports the release of $5.625 million to E. Jean Carroll, citing the court records and the judge's order. It correctly notes the timeline and the legal arguments from both sides. The article is faithful to the primary source and provides additional context about the case and T
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the facts but includes a quote from Trump's legal team that may introduce a subtle bias. The tone is generally neutral, but the inclusion of the quote from Trump's legal team might slightly influence the reader's perception, reducing the overall objectivity score.
NBC NewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 0Objective 08 days agoE. Jean Carroll has received the $5 million judgment against former President Donald Trump in a sexual abuse and defamation case, nearly four years after a jury found him liable. The funds were held in a court escrow account and were recently disbursed to Carroll’s attorneys. Trump’s legal team criticized the ruling, calling it a 'Witch Hunt' and claiming it was funded by Democrats. The case originated from allegations that Trump sexually assaulted Carroll in 1996 and defamed her after she came forward in 2019. Trump denies knowing Carroll and asserts he committed no wrongdoing. While Trump’s appeals were unsuccessful, Carroll plans to use the funds for retirement and has indicated she may allocate some to other purposes, though this was clarified to reference a different, larger judgment. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected Trump’s request to review the case.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Trump’s legal arguments as part of a broader 'Witch Hunt' and 'Liberal Lawfare,' suggesting a left-leaning perspective. It highlights the judicial outcome favoring Carroll, who is portrayed as a victim seeking justice, while Trump’s defense is characterized as denial and political
Why factuality (0): This article is unrelated to the main event and discusses a different case involving Hunter Biden. It contains no relevant information about the release of funds to E. Jean Carroll and thus scores very low on factuality.
Why objectivity (0): This article is entirely unrelated to the main event and therefore cannot be assessed for objectivity in relation to the specific event described in the primary source document.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
