ON
← Back to feed
Iran promises to resist interference by foreign 'enemies' as Trump threatens new sanctions
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Iran promises to resist interference by foreign 'enemies' as Trump threatens new sanctions

In late August 2026, Iran's parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, emphasized the deepening relationship between Iran and Iraq, stating that external forces seeking to divide the two nations would fail. He highlighted shared historical, geographical, and religious ties, asserting that both countries would resist foreign interference in their decisions. This comes amid U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of 'toughest sanctions in history' aimed at crippling Iran's economy, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claiming these measures would lead to the collapse of the Iranian regime. The U.S. faces challenges maintaining control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, and rising oil prices add pressure on the administration. Iran condemned the sanctions as 'economic terrorism' and violations of human rights.

Iran’s parliament speaker vowed Thursday to resist interference by foreign “enemies” as U.S. President Donald Trump escalated threats of sweeping sanctions aimed at crippling the Islamic Republic. Speaking during an Arbaeen ceremony in Karbala, Iraq, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf emphasized the deep historical, geographical, and religious ties between Iran and Iraq, warning that external pressures would only strengthen their alliance. He declared that neither nation would allow foreign powers to dictate their future, urging both countries to focus on economic growth and regional stability through collaboration. Ghalibaf called for joint initiatives to enhance living standards, bolster economic independence, and limit outside influence in the Middle East. His remarks followed reports that the U.S. had failed to gain military dominance over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, with a fragile ceasefire between the two nations effectively broken. In response to mounting tensions, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent announced plans to implement “the toughest sanctions in history” on Iran, framing them as a necessary step to undermine the regime’s economic resilience. Bessent described the sanctions as part of a dual strategy, combining existing economic restrictions with new measures designed to isolate Iran further. He claimed the policy would succeed in destabilizing the government, stating that the sanctions would be detailed in coming days. The announcement came a day after Trump labeled his approach an “economic D-Day” on Iran, warning that any state aiding Tehran would face “TREMENDOUS Economic Consequences.” Iran swiftly condemned the sanctions, calling them “economic terrorism” and asserting they constituted crimes against humanity. The Iranian government accused the U.S. of targeting ordinary citizens rather than addressing the root causes of the conflict. Meanwhile, the Trump administration faced growing challenges as global energy prices surged, complicating its broader economic agenda. Brent Crude, the international oil benchmark, rose nearly two percent to $93.41 per barrel on Thursday, reflecting ongoing instability in the region. The situation has disrupted global shipping routes, with the cost of chartering tankers soaring sharply. BWET, an exchange-traded fund tracking shipping rates, saw a dramatic increase of 98 percent over the previous month. These developments have placed additional strain on the Trump administration, which is already grappling with rising borrowing costs and inflationary pressures. Iran’s attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz continue, while its ally in Yemen, the Houthi rebels, maintain a maritime blockade against Saudi Arabia in the Red Sea. This has forced Riyadh to divert oil exports through the Suez Canal via Egypt, further disrupting regional trade networks. Bessent acknowledged these disruptions, suggesting that the U.S. might need to engage China more directly in its sanctions strategy. He urged Beijing to align with American interests, arguing that the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and reduced energy prices would benefit the global economy. In separate developments, Iran’s foreign ministry rejected claims that a 60-day deadline tied to a June memorandum with the U.S. remained valid. Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei denied that the agreement included such a timeframe, insisting that Iran’s policies are guided by long-term strategic goals rather than external pressures. He accused the U.S. of violating the terms of the agreement, claiming that the failure to initiate meaningful negotiations rendered the deadline obsolete. Meanwhile, Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed a desire to conclude hostilities with the U.S. from a position of strength, signaling internal debates about the extent to which economic hardship could be endured. His remarks underscored the complexity of Iran’s stance, balancing resistance to Western pressure with the need to preserve national sovereignty amid escalating sanctions. As the standoff intensifies, the implications for regional stability and global markets remain uncertain.

3 reports

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 752 days ago
Iran promises to resist interference by foreign 'enemies' as Trump threatens new sanctions

In late August 2026, Iran's parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, emphasized the deepening relationship between Iran and Iraq, stating that external forces seeking to divide the two nations would fail. He highlighted shared historical, geographical, and religious ties, asserting that both countries would resist foreign interference in their decisions. This comes amid U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of 'toughest sanctions in history' aimed at crippling Iran's economy, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claiming these measures would lead to the collapse of the Iranian regime. The U.S. faces challenges maintaining control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, and rising oil prices add pressure on the administration. Iran condemned the sanctions as 'economic terrorism' and violations of human rights.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the U.S. sanctions as a necessary and justified measure against Iran, using strong language like 'toughest sanctions in history' and 'collapse this regime.' It emphasizes the threat posed by Iran and portrays the U.S. actions as decisive and effective. The focus on Trump's 'D-Day'

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Iran's parliamentary speaker's statements about resisting foreign interference and strengthening ties with Iraq. It also mentions Trump's threat of new sanctions, though the claim that the US has been 'unable to militarily assert its control over the Strait of Hormuz'

Why objectivity (75): The article presents both Iranian and US perspectives without overt bias, but uses phrases like 'war on the country continues without resolution' which slightly frames the situation from a Western perspective. The tone remains mostly neutral.

Financial Times logoFinancial TimesIndependent🔒CenterFactual 40Objective 702 days ago
Iran’s president calls to end war with US from ‘position of strength’

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian has suggested that the country should seek to end the ongoing conflict with the United States from a position of strength, indicating internal discussions within the Iranian leadership about the limits of economic pressure the nation can withstand. The remarks highlight growing concerns within the Iranian government about the impact of sustained sanctions and international isolation on the economy. While the administration remains committed to resisting foreign interference, there is increasing recognition of the need for strategic diplomacy to mitigate further economic hardship. This shift reflects broader tensions within the Iranian political establishment regarding the balance between national sovereignty and pragmatic engagement.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the internal debate within the Iranian government without overtly favoring any particular faction or ideology. It focuses on the strategic considerations rather than taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the complexity of

Why factuality (40): The article mentions Iran's president calling for an end to the war with the U.S. from 'a position of strength,' which aligns with broader discussions about U.S.-Iran tensions. However, it lacks specific details about the ongoing negotiations, the 60-day MOU, or the expert analyses from the Secure L

Why objectivity (70): The tone of the article appears neutral, focusing on the president's statement without overtly taking sides. It presents the claim as a reflection of internal debate within the Iranian regime, which suggests a balanced approach. However, the lack of deeper analysis or contextualization could be seen

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentProgressiveyesterday
US 'economic terrorism' will not break people's will: Iranian Vice President

On August 22, 2026, Iran's First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref rejected U.S. economic pressures, calling them 'economic terrorism.' He stated that such measures fail to change the will of the Iranian people and instead threaten national stability. The comments followed U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of new sanctions against Iran, which he described as 'the most crushing economic operation' against the country.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the U.S. sanctions as 'economic terrorism,' a term with strong negative connotations, and portrays Iran's stance as defiant and resolute. This framing aligns with left-leaning perspectives that often criticize U.S. foreign policy and support anti-imperialist narratives. The focus,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories