Donald Trump’s second term as president has seen his administration continue its aggressive deregulatory push, particularly targeting environmental regulations. Since taking office, the administration has focused on reducing regulatory burdens and limiting the authority of federal agencies, especially the Environmental Protection Agency. These efforts have largely been carried out through executive orders, directives, and agency actions without congressional backing. While some of these measures aim to streamline federal oversight, critics argue that they lack the legal durability necessary for long-term impact. The administration’s strategy relies heavily on presidential unilateralism, a tactic that has become increasingly common in modern governance. By bypassing the legislative process, the Trump team has accelerated its deregulatory agenda, often at the expense of stability. For example, the administration has used the "good cause" doctrine to expedite changes without requiring public input or formal notice. Such shortcuts, however, can be reversed quickly, leaving many of the administration’s policies vulnerable to reversal should the political landscape shift. Despite these challenges, there are instances where the administration has attempted to secure more enduring outcomes. One such effort involves working with Congress to pass Congressional Review Act resolutions, which would formally repeal specific regulations. These legislative actions, if approved, could offer greater permanence compared to executive actions. Additionally, the administration has sought judicial approval for its reinterpretations of environmental statutes, hoping to solidify its regulatory changes through court rulings. A recent example of this deregulatory trend comes from the Department of the Interior, which announced a sweeping expansion of hunting and sport fishing opportunities across the National Wildlife Refuge System. Over 92 million acres, nearly all of the refuge system, are now open to recreational use, marking what officials call the largest expansion in the service’s history. This decision was made in anticipation of the fall 2026 hunting season, which begins in late August and September. The move allows for 1,488 new hunting and fishing opportunities across 32 states, including access to 107 national wildlife refuges and four national fish hatcheries. Some refuges and hatcheries are opening for the first time to hunting and fishing. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik emphasized that the change aligns federal regulations with state laws, promotes healthier wildlife habitats, and supports local economies. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum added that the adjustment reduces the regulatory burden on outdoor enthusiasts. The Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation praised the initiative, calling it a historic expansion that enhances access for sportsmen and women. Taylor Schmitz, the foundation’s senior vice president, noted that the rule helps reduce confusion for hunters and anglers and underscores the role of states in managing wildlife resources. However, not all groups have endorsed the decision. The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership acknowledged the expanded access but cautioned against losing sight of localized wildlife management. Meanwhile, Defenders of Wildlife expressed concern, stating that refuges have received minimal congressional support and that critical management activities are no longer being adequately addressed. These divergent responses highlight the broader debate surrounding the administration’s deregulatory approach. While some view the changes as beneficial for recreational access and economic growth, others warn that they risk undermining conservation efforts and straining already limited resources. As the administration continues its push for deregulation, the long-term sustainability of its policies remains uncertain, dependent on whether they gain legislative or judicial support.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter