ON
← Back to feed
Trump gives free rein to US companies to carry out cyberattacks against hackers
Italy🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives8 days ago

Trump gives free rein to US companies to carry out cyberattacks against hackers

The article reports that the Trump administration is encouraging U.S. companies to conduct cyberattacks against hackers, according to informed officials cited by the New York Times. A memorandum signed by President Trump allows selected companies to collaborate with the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security to target foreign criminal hacking groups through cyber operations. This approach brings the U.S. closer to countries like China and Russia, where private sector hackers are used for national security purposes. The initiative marks a shift from decades of cybersecurity policies that prioritized strengthening corporate defenses over offensive cyber actions. Experts warn this could lead to a 'Wild West' scenario in cyberspace. Participating companies would need to undergo selection processes, sign contracts with financial penalties for violations, and obtain approval from federal agencies before launching attacks. The policy explicitly prohibits attacks that could cause loss of life, serious injury, or constitute the use of force under international law.

President Donald Trump has authorized U.S. companies to conduct cyberattacks against foreign hackers, according to officials familiar with the move, as reported by The New York Times. The decision was formalized through a national security memo signed by Trump late Wednesday. Under this directive, select American firms would collaborate with the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security to target foreign cybercriminal groups using hacking operations. This approach brings the United States closer to practices used by countries such as China and Russia, where intelligence agencies have long employed private-sector hackers for national security purposes. The memo outlines that these attacks could serve both surveillance and operational functions, including disrupting, manipulating, or destroying enemy information systems and networks. However, the specifics of which companies will participate remain unclear. The policy marks a sharp departure from decades of cybersecurity strategies under both Republican and Democratic administrations, which emphasized strengthening corporate defenses rather than authorizing offensive cyber operations. Private sector involvement in such activities had previously been limited to military and intelligence agencies. Experts warn that allowing private entities to engage in cyber warfare could lead to a chaotic digital frontier, akin to the Wild West. The memo does include safeguards, however, requiring participating companies to undergo selection procedures, sign government contracts with penalties up to $1 million for violations, and obtain approval from the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security before launching an attack. Additionally, the policy explicitly prohibits actions that could likely result in loss of human life, serious injury, or constitute the use of force or armed attack under international law. The initiative reflects a broader shift in U.S. cybersecurity strategy, moving away from passive defense mechanisms toward more aggressive countermeasures. While previous administrations had explored the potential of private-sector collaboration in cyber defense, none had formally sanctioned offensive operations conducted by commercial entities. The new policy raises questions about oversight, accountability, and the potential escalation of conflicts in cyberspace. Trump’s administration has faced scrutiny over its handling of cybersecurity issues, particularly following several high-profile data breaches attributed to foreign adversaries. Critics argue that the proposed measures could blur the lines between legitimate defense and offensive action, potentially increasing the risk of unintended consequences. Supporters, however, contend that the move is necessary to protect critical infrastructure and deter hostile actors operating beyond traditional military boundaries. The memorandum was issued amid growing concerns over the vulnerability of U.S. businesses and government systems to sophisticated cyber threats. Intelligence reports suggest that state-sponsored hackers from rival nations have increasingly targeted American interests, prompting calls for more robust responses. By involving private companies in the effort, the administration aims to leverage their technical expertise and resources to bolster national security capabilities. The policy's implementation will depend on the establishment of clear guidelines and regulatory frameworks to ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards. Officials have indicated that the process will involve extensive consultations with industry leaders and legal experts to address potential challenges. As the program unfolds, it will be crucial to monitor its impact on international relations, corporate behavior, and the overall stability of global cyberspace.

2 reports

ANSA logoANSAIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 8510 days ago
Trump gives free rein to US companies to carry out cyberattacks against hackers

The article reports that the Trump administration is encouraging U.S. companies to conduct cyberattacks against hackers, according to informed officials cited by the New York Times. A memorandum signed by President Trump allows selected companies to collaborate with the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security to target foreign criminal hacking groups through cyber operations. This approach brings the U.S. closer to countries like China and Russia, where private sector hackers are used for national security purposes. The initiative marks a shift from decades of cybersecurity policies that prioritized strengthening corporate defenses over offensive cyber actions. Experts warn this could lead to a 'Wild West' scenario in cyberspace. Participating companies would need to undergo selection processes, sign contracts with financial penalties for violations, and obtain approval from federal agencies before launching attacks. The policy explicitly prohibits attacks that could cause loss of life, serious injury, or constitute the use of force under international law.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Trump administration's decision as a strategic move that aligns with broader geopolitical trends involving nations like China and Russia. It emphasizes the expansion of state-sanctioned cyber capabilities and the potential risks of creating a chaotic cyber environment, which倾向

Why factuality (90): The article provides a comprehensive overview of the policy change, including the memorandum, the involvement of selected companies, the collaboration with Justice and Homeland Security departments, and the procedural requirements. These details are consistent with the broader context of U.S. cybers

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias or emotional language. It includes expert warnings about potential consequences but frames them as cautionary rather than opinionated. The structure is objective, focusing on what is known and reported without injecting pe

la Repubblica logola RepubblicaIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 75Objective 608 days ago
Private company hackers against foreign criminal groups: Trump imitates Russia and China

The article reports that President Trump has issued a memorandum allowing certain private companies to collaborate with the U.S. government to target foreign cybercriminal groups. This move is described as mirroring actions taken by Russia and China, which have also engaged in similar state-sponsored cyber operations. The decision is part of broader national security efforts to combat international cyber threats.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the president's action as a strategic move akin to those of authoritarian regimes like Russia and China, implying a departure from traditional norms. The emphasis on 'mirroring' these countries suggests a narrative that aligns with conservative critiques of increased executive and

Why factuality (75): The article reports that President Trump has allowed some companies to collaborate with the government to attack foreign hackers, as stated in a national security memorandum. This aligns with the cross-source consensus from ANSA, which also mentions the memorandum and the authorization of corporate

Why objectivity (60): The tone of the article appears more sensational, using phrases like 'Hacker di aziende private contro i gruppi criminali stranieri' which may imply a more dramatic narrative. The article does not provide balanced context or mention potential risks or criticisms, unlike the more detailed and neutral

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories