ON
← Back to feed
Trump considering moving White House press corps
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative

Trump considering moving White House press corps

President Donald Trump stated on Truth Social that he is considering relocating the White House press corps from its current briefing room to another area within the White House complex. This announcement followed reports that he had discussed restoring an indoor swimming pool originally built during the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration, which was later covered over to create the current briefing space. While Trump denied having any intention of rebuilding the pool, he suggested moving the press corps to utilize the space for other administrative needs. The proposal follows recent incidents where the administration restricted access for specific journalists and banned several major news outlets, actions that have been challenged in federal court. The White House Correspondents' Association criticized the potential move as retaliatory, while a White House spokesperson defended the restrictions by arguing that journalists do not have a constitutional right to access sensitive presidential facilities.

President Donald Trump confirmed on Sunday that he is considering relocating the White House press corps from its historic position within the executive mansion. While he explicitly denied plans to demolish the current briefing room to restore an indoor swimming pool located beneath it, he stated he intends to move the accredited journalists to a different site. The president described the proposed new location as one that provides "very badly needed space" for the administration. The comments came in response to a report published by The New York Times on Tuesday. The newspaper reported that Trump had expressed to aides his desire to bring back an indoor pool originally installed in 1933 during the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. The pool was subsequently covered over during the tenure of Richard Nixon to create space for the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room. Trump dismissed these reports as false, writing on Truth Social that he had never considered restoring the pool. He characterized the idea as "stupid" and insisted the old swimming pool would never be brought back. However, he left open the possibility of moving the media personnel themselves, suggesting he might relocate what he referred to as "Fake News" to a "less obnoxious location." Earlier in the month, on September 27, Trump posted side-by-side images on Truth Social depicting the current press briefing room and an ornate indoor pool. The images were labeled "Fake News Before" and "FDR Pool After," prompting speculation about whether the president was serious about altering the structure or merely taunting the news media. Subsequent reporting indicated that Trump had discussed moving the press corps elsewhere, though no final decision had been established at that time. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung previously declined to rule out changes, stating that "all options remain on the table" and that the administration would announce decisions when appropriate. The potential relocation occurs amidst ongoing construction projects at the White House. The federal government initiated a project in October 2025 to replace the East Wing, following an August Supreme Court order. The existing East Wing was demolished by December 2025. Plans call for a new structure featuring an above-ground ballroom and a below-ground military facility. Images of the demolition, showing piles of rubble and construction equipment, drew criticism from preservationists and political opponents. The administration defended the work as necessary, claiming the completed project would leave the White House more beautiful than ever. The Supreme Court allowed construction to continue on August 31 while litigation proceeded. The court majority ruled that the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which challenged the project, likely lacked standing. Chief Justice John Roberts joined three liberal justices in dissent, describing the construction as likely unlawful. Relations between the Trump administration and the press have become increasingly contentious. In September, the White House banned CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the premises, accusing the outlets of spreading inventions and lies. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued an order on September 24 requiring the administration to immediately return, reinstate, and restore access for the barred organizations, ruling that they were likely not given sufficient due process. Despite this, the Department of Justice stated last week that the government would continue to litigate against the reinstatement. Additionally, Andrew Feinberg, a correspondent for The Independent, was removed from his print press pool duties after a heated exchange with the president in the Oval Office. Jacqui Heinrich, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, condemned the restriction of Feinberg’s access. She accused the White House of acting in retaliation and argued that the American public’s right to an independent press depends on reporters being able to work without fear that challenging the president will cut off their access. Heinrich also criticized the earlier bans on other news organizations. A White House spokesperson stated that no person or journalist has a constitutional right to access the Oval Office, Air Force One, or other sensitive facilities. The spokesperson added that when publications lie or fabricate, proximity matters less, and they can write their fiction from outside secure facilities. Recent interactions between Trump and journalists have included verbal attacks. During a departure from the White House for a rally in South Carolina, Trump clashed with reporters regarding the release of Stephen Hubbard, a retired teacher from Michigan who had been jailed in Russia. When CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins asked about claims that Vladimir Putin requested nothing in exchange for Hubbard’s release, Trump responded by calling her a "low IQ person" and a "dummy." He also directed insults at an ABC News reporter, calling her "stupid" and labeling her network the worst of all. These exchanges follow a pattern of fiery confrontations with female journalists, whom Trump has previously described as terrible, stupid, and dumb. Legal disputes with media entities continue, with ABC and CBS agreeing to pay $15 million and $16 million respectively in settlements, while lawsuits against The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal proceed.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

5 reports

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
WHCA condemns removal of journalist from White House pool

The White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) has formally criticized the administration's decision to limit the press credentials of a specific journalist. This action follows an incident where President Donald Trump verbally confronted the reporter during an Oval Office meeting. The WHCA president stated that restricting access based on individual interactions undermines the integrity of the press pool system. The controversy centers on whether personal conflicts between a sitting president and a member of the media justify punitive measures against professional accreditation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the event through the lens of the journalists' association condemning the action, using terms like 'condemned' and highlighting the restriction of access. By focusing exclusively on the criticism from the WHCA and describing the presidential reaction negatively ('lashed out'), the

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral and journalistic. It reports the action taken by the WHCA and the context of the dispute without using emotionally charged language or taking a side. Phrases like 'condemned' and 'lashed out' are attributed to the respective actors or describe observable actions rather than injec

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 40
Trump Calls Reporters ‘Dummy’ and ‘Stupid’ in Latest Media Clashes

President Donald Trump engaged in verbal confrontations with reporters from CNN and ABC while leaving the White House for a campaign rally in South Carolina. The exchanges centered on the release of Stephen Hubbard, a US citizen detained in Russia, and whether any concessions were made to Moscow in return. When pressed by CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins and an ABC reporter regarding potential trade-offs involving sanctions, Trump dismissed their inquiries, labeling the journalists 'stupid,' 'dummies,' and part of 'fake news.' This incident follows a pattern of recent clashes between the administration and the press, including a prior dispute with The Independent journalist Andrew Feinberg and the White House's decision to ban several major news outlets from accessing the building.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the conflict primarily through the lens of the President's direct attacks on specific journalists, emphasizing his characterization of them as 'stupid' and 'fake news.' While it includes a quote from a media scholar criticizing the normalization of aggression toward women, the lea

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (40): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, focusing on insults ('dummy', 'stupid') rather than policy substance, but since it covers a different topic entirely, it fails to present any objective view of the actual event described in the source.

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentConservative
Trump considering moving White House press corps

President Donald Trump stated on Truth Social that he is considering relocating the White House press corps from its current briefing room to another area within the White House complex. This announcement followed reports that he had discussed restoring an indoor swimming pool originally built during the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration, which was later covered over to create the current briefing space. While Trump denied having any intention of rebuilding the pool, he suggested moving the press corps to utilize the space for other administrative needs. The proposal follows recent incidents where the administration restricted access for specific journalists and banned several major news outlets, actions that have been challenged in federal court. The White House Correspondents' Association criticized the potential move as retaliatory, while a White House spokesperson defended the restrictions by arguing that journalists do not have a constitutional right to access sensitive presidential facilities.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy primarily through the lens of the administration's justification for restricting press access, quoting a White House spokesperson who argues that lying journalists deserve reduced proximity to the President. It highlights the legal challenges faced by the bans on *

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentCenter
Trump Denies Plan to Replace White House Press Room With Swimming Pool

President Donald Trump publicly denied reports that he intends to demolish the White House press briefing room to restore the historic indoor swimming pool located beneath it. In a post on Truth Social, Trump dismissed the claim as 'Fake News' and stated that he had never considered such an action, though he noted he might relocate the press corps to a different location. This denial follows a previous social media post where Trump shared images contrasting the current briefing room with the former pool, labeling them 'Before' and 'After.' The controversy arises against the backdrop of a major renovation project replacing the White House East Wing, which includes plans for a new ballroom and underground facilities. The Supreme Court recently permitted the construction to proceed despite legal challenges regarding historic preservation, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the dissenters who described the project as likely unlawful.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the President's denial and the surrounding context. It quotes Trump’s specific words, including his derogatory terms for the press, but frames them neutrally within the broader narrative of the contentious relationship between the administration and the媒体.

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentConservative
Trump hints that White House press area may be moved to another location

President Donald Trump responded to media reports suggesting he intended to replace the White House press briefing room with an indoor swimming pool by clarifying his intentions during a Saturday morning address. While denying the specific claim about installing a pool, the President stated he is considering relocating the media presence to a different site within the complex. He described the proposed new location as 'less obnoxious,' indicating dissatisfaction with the current dynamic between the administration and journalists. This statement follows a report by The New York Times published earlier in the week, which alleged that Trump had discussed bringing back an indoor pool facility with his aides.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the President's actions through his direct quotes, specifically using the term 'obnoxious' to describe the media environment, which reflects a negative characterization of the press corps often associated with right-leaning narratives. By focusing on the President's pushback and a

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories