ON
← Back to feed
Trump confirms IRGC backchannel, threatens to 'bomb the s***' out of Oman if it 'gets in the way'
IL🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative6 days ago

Trump confirms IRGC backchannel, threatens to 'bomb the s***' out of Oman if it 'gets in the way'

US President Donald Trump confirmed during a conversation with FOX News that there is a backchannel communication with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), facilitated by Kurdistan Regional Government President Nechirvan Barzani. Trump emphasized that current military actions against Iran are minimal compared to available US capabilities and warned that the US would take extreme measures against Oman if it obstructed US operations in the Strait of Hormuz. He criticized former President Joe Biden for transferring advanced weapons to Ukraine and reiterated the US goal of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Additionally, Trump claimed that Hamas has agreed to demilitarize Gaza and suggested Israel should halt attacks in the territory. These remarks came amid ongoing diplomatic efforts involving Israeli leaders and international figures.

US President Donald Trump confirmed to FOX News on Monday that there is a backchannel with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officials, as the 60-day period in the Memorandum of Understanding expired. Trump also threatened to "bomb the s*** out of Oman" if it "gets in the way" of US control in the Strait of Hormuz. This follows reports that Iran and Oman have reached an "in principle" agreement on a new transit route for ships passing through the strategic waterway. According to Axios, Kurdistan Regional Government President Nechirvan Barzani has been identified as the intermediary in the secret backchannel, based on information from three sources with direct knowledge of the discussions. Barzani, who lived in Iran during the Iraq-Iran War in the 1980s, studied at the University of Tehran, and speaks fluent Farsi, has personal ties with several IRGC members. Trump emphasized that Iran should "raise the white flag of surrender," stating he has "no time schedule" and is "in no hurry" to make a deal. He described the Iranians as "good poker players, but they’re dying," suggesting that the continued US naval blockade has increased pressure on the regime. The situation escalated further when Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei announced that an understanding had been reached regarding the map of the transit route with Oman. The agreement, which would allow ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz without paying fees or tolls during an interim period, reportedly involves a route close to Iran and another close to Oman. Baghaei noted that the talks have progressed slowly, though the plan to finalize the understanding in the form of a package, comprising the map and a joint statement, remains intact. However, the 60-day deadline for reaching an agreement under the June memorandum of understanding expired with no resolution, leading to renewed tensions. Trump’s remarks came amid heightened military activity around the strait, with US forces conducting operations to enforce a naval blockade against Iran. The US has accused Iran of restricting maritime traffic, prompting retaliatory strikes. In response to the developments, Trump reiterated that the "number one Goal is, and always will be, that Iran cannot have, in any way, shape, or form, a Nuclear Weapon." This stance appears to contradict recent statements by US Vice President JD Vance, who prioritized lowering gas prices over preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities. Additionally, Trump claimed that the June 2025 bombing of three Iranian uranium enrichment facilities had "obliterated" Iran’s nuclear capability and set back its program by decades. While the exact impact of these strikes remains unclear, the International Atomic Energy Agency previously reported that Iran was enriching uranium to 60 percent before the attack. Trump also mentioned that the US has many mid-level weapons but that more advanced systems, including air-defense systems, were "given away" to Ukraine by former President Joe Biden. Separately, Trump stated that the US has a "different channel with Hamas" and has been discussing demilitarizing the Gaza Strip. He suggested that Israel should not strike in Gaza because Hamas has agreed to "ultimately give up their guns." These comments followed meetings between US officials, including Jared Kushner, Nikolay Mladenov, and Tony Blair, with Israeli leaders such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push forward with plans for Gaza. As the situation continues to evolve, the implications of the Iran-Oman agreement and the potential consequences of Trump’s threats remain uncertain. With the 60-day MOU expired and diplomatic efforts stalled, the focus shifts toward whether the US can secure a deal or whether military action becomes inevitable. Meanwhile, the role of the backchannel and the influence of figures like Barzani could play a critical part in shaping the outcome.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

i24NEWS logoi24NEWSIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 856 days ago
'In principle' agreement set between Iran and Oman on new Strait of Hormuz transit route

The article reports that Iran and Oman have reached an 'in principle' agreement to establish a new transit route through the Strait of Hormuz. This development is significant as the Strait of Hormuz is a critical maritime passage for global oil transportation. The agreement aims to enhance regional cooperation and improve logistical efficiency for both nations. While the details of the proposed route and its operational framework remain unspecified, the collaboration signals growing diplomatic engagement between Iran and Oman. The agreement could potentially impact international trade routes and energy security in the region.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the agreement as a bilateral initiative without overtly emphasizing ideological or geopolitical tensions. It focuses on the practical implications of the transit route rather than taking a partisan stance. The language remains neutral, avoiding strong endorsements of either Iran

Why factuality (80): The article states there is an 'in principle' agreement between Iran and Oman, which matches the cross-source consensus. It provides a concise summary without embellishment, though it does not elaborate on the specifics of the agreement or the implications.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the information without overt emotional language or political bias. It focuses on reporting the agreement without taking sides or adding commentary.

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 656 days ago
Trump threatens to bomb Oman over its deal with Iran on Hormuz, as 60-day MOU expires

US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Oman if it interferes with US-Iran negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz, following reports that Iran and Oman reached an agreement on shipping routes through the strategic waterway. The deal, which allows ships to transit without fees, comes as a 60-day deadline under a June memorandum of understanding expired without progress. Trump claimed the US has established a secret backchannel with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, emphasizing preventing a nuclear-armed Iran as his top priority. The situation highlights ongoing tensions between the US and Iran over control of Hormuz and Iran's nuclear program.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Trump's threats and actions in a manner consistent with right-leaning rhetoric, emphasizing strong executive action and national security concerns. It portrays Trump as taking decisive measures against perceived adversaries (Oman and Iran), using language like 'bomb the shit out'

Why factuality (75): The article reports Trump's threats against Oman based on a Fox News interview, which is a secondary source. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that Trump threatened to bomb Oman over the Iran-Oman deal on Hormuz. However, it lacks specific details on the exact nature of the agreement or the

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat sensational, using phrases like 'bomb the shit out of them,' which may reflect editorial bias. While it presents Trump's statements neutrally, the choice of words carries a certain level of emotional weight, affecting objectivity.

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 70Objective 606 days ago
Trump confirms IRGC backchannel, threatens to 'bomb the s***' out of Oman if it 'gets in the way'

US President Donald Trump confirmed during a conversation with FOX News that there is a backchannel communication with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), facilitated by Kurdistan Regional Government President Nechirvan Barzani. Trump emphasized that current military actions against Iran are minimal compared to available US capabilities and warned that the US would take extreme measures against Oman if it obstructed US operations in the Strait of Hormuz. He criticized former President Joe Biden for transferring advanced weapons to Ukraine and reiterated the US goal of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Additionally, Trump claimed that Hamas has agreed to demilitarize Gaza and suggested Israel should halt attacks in the territory. These remarks came amid ongoing diplomatic efforts involving Israeli leaders and international figures.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Trump's statements as assertive and confrontational toward Iran and its allies, using strong language such as 'bomb the s*** out of Oman' and implying that Iran is 'dying.' It emphasizes Trump's hardline stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions and portrays his approach as decisive and鹰

Why factuality (70): The article includes details about the backchannel with the IRGC and mentions Trump's comments on military actions. These align with the cross-source consensus, but it adds information about the munitions used against Iran and the claim about Biden giving away weapons, which may not be widely corrob

Why objectivity (60): The article uses strong language such as 'bomb the s*** out of them' and makes assertions about Biden's actions that may be seen as politically charged. This affects the overall objectivity, as it introduces potential bias.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories