ON
← Back to feed
Trump will charge for faster access to his posts.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives5 hr. ago

Trump will charge for faster access to his posts.

Trump Media & Technology Group announced a new subscription service offering faster access to posts from high-profile accounts on their platform Truth Social, including former U.S. President Donald Trump’s account. The service, aimed at brokers, investment firms, and financial information providers, allows users to gain a slight advantage in making investment decisions based on market reactions to Trump’s posts. These posts often influence stock prices, bond values, and interest rates. Critics, including law professor Kathleen Clark, argue this represents a form of corruption, as it commodifies access to information arising from Trump’s public duties. They claim it improperly exploits state power for personal enrichment. The company, owned by Trump’s family, has not yet responded to questions about whether the service could provide financial benefits directly tied to Trump’s presidential role.

Trump Media & Technology Group announced it will begin charging users for faster access to its content starting August 1. The new service will allow subscribers to gain quicker access to posts from the most followed accounts on its platform, including the official account of U.S. President Donald Trump. According to the company, this feature is primarily aimed at financial professionals, investment firms, and providers of financial information, who can benefit significantly from even a few seconds of advantage in making investment decisions. President Trump frequently posts messages on topics such as tariffs, trade relations, foreign policy, and other issues that often trigger reactions on financial markets. These statements have been known to influence stock prices, bond values, and interest rates. The company claims that the new service enables users to react more swiftly to changes in these areas, potentially giving them an edge in decision-making. Kevin McGurn, interim chief executive officer of Trump Media & Technology Group, stated that financial markets already respond to posts on Truth Social. He emphasized that users could gain an advantage due to changes in stock prices, bonds, or interest rates following the president’s announcements. Critics, however, argue that the move raises ethical concerns regarding conflicts of interest. Experts in ethics and conflict of interest have expressed skepticism over the potential implications of the president commercializing access to information derived from his public duties. Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University School of Law and an expert on conflict of interest rules in American government, described the situation as “another blatant form of corruption” and noted it represents “an inappropriate exploitation of state power for personal enrichment.” Clark further pointed out that the president is selling preferential access to information about his actions as a leader, which could create unfair advantages for those willing to pay. She stressed that such practices undermine transparency and fairness in both political and financial spheres. The company, owned by the Trump family, has not responded to questions about whether the new service would enable financial gains specifically through the president's role. This lack of response has fueled speculation among critics and analysts alike. The announcement has sparked broader discussions about the intersection of politics and finance, particularly concerning how public figures leverage their positions for private profit. Some observers suggest that the ability to access real-time updates from high-profile accounts could lead to market manipulation or insider trading, depending on how the data is used. As the service prepares to launch, industry experts are monitoring its impact on financial markets and regulatory responses. While some see it as a tool for efficiency, others warn of the risks associated with prioritizing speed over transparency. The debate continues, with calls for clearer guidelines on how public officials should handle their digital presence and the potential consequences of monetizing their influence.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

tportal logotportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 65yesterday
Trump will charge for faster access to his posts.

Trump Media & Technology Group announced a new subscription service offering faster access to posts from high-profile accounts on their platform Truth Social, including former U.S. President Donald Trump’s account. The service, aimed at brokers, investment firms, and financial information providers, allows users to gain a slight advantage in making investment decisions based on market reactions to Trump’s posts. These posts often influence stock prices, bond values, and interest rates. Critics, including law professor Kathleen Clark, argue this represents a form of corruption, as it commodifies access to information arising from Trump’s public duties. They claim it improperly exploits state power for personal enrichment. The company, owned by Trump’s family, has not yet responded to questions about whether the service could provide financial benefits directly tied to Trump’s presidential role.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a potential conflict of interest and corruption, using strong critical language such as 'drskom obliku korupcije' ('another bold form of corruption') and emphasizes ethical concerns raised by experts. It highlights criticism from legal scholars and does not give a

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the launch date of the new service by Trump Media & Technology Group, mentions the target audience (brokers, investment firms), and includes quotes from industry experts like Kevin McGurn. It also references criticisms from ethics specialists regarding potential confli

Why objectivity (65): The article presents both sides of the issue—describing the service and its benefits while including criticism from ethics experts. However, it leans slightly toward highlighting the ethical concerns, using emotionally charged terms like 'drskom obliku korupcije,' which may reflect a bias toward cri

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentProgressive5 hr. ago
The brother of the head of the Ukrainian Investigative Bureau bought 143 apartments at incredibly low prices

A report by multiple Ukrainian media outlets reveals that Oleksandr Sukhov, the brother of Oleksiy Sukhov—the head of Ukraine’s State Investigative Service (SBI)—purchased 143 properties in Kharkiv at significantly below-market prices between 2018 and 2020. The properties were bought for amounts ranging from $932 to $1,856 per unit, far lower than the market rate of approximately $800 per square meter. These purchases occurred while Oleksiy Sukhov was serving as deputy head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), and later became head of the SBI in 2021. The investigation highlights potential conflicts of interest and irregularities, including a criminal case against the construction firm Stroy City for allegedly building without proper permits. Despite this, the SBI’s handling of the case has been criticized for being slow, and no formal charges have been filed against anyone involved.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents evidence suggesting corruption and conflict of interest involving a high-ranking Ukrainian official and his sibling, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of elite power and systemic corruption. The framing emphasizes the unusually low purchase prices and the lack of legal追究,

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories