ON
← Back to feed
Green Card Update: Report Shows Applicants With Longest Wait Times
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative6 hr. ago

Green Card Update: Report Shows Applicants With Longest Wait Times

A new analysis by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) reveals significant backlogs in the U.S. employment-based immigration system, with some applicants facing waits of up to 179 years for permanent residency. The report focuses on the EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 categories, noting that professionals from India are expected to experience the longest delays due to visa caps and high demand. The backlog grew to 1.26 million people by December 2025, with India accounting for nearly 1 million of those waiting. The U.S. State Department acknowledged reaching annual visa limits and emphasized processing decisions based on statutory requirements and national security considerations. The Trump administration's policies, including stricter vetting and higher fees, have contributed to these challenges.

The Trump administration has initiated construction of a new border wall segment in southern Arizona, despite objections from the Tohono O’odham Nation, a Native American tribe whose territory straddles the U.S.-Mexico border. According to reports, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel and contractors began work on the project early Tuesday, entering areas claimed by the tribe and starting preparations for the wall. The project is part of a broader initiative to secure the U.S. border with a combination of steel bollards, vehicle barriers, and surveillance technology, backed by a $46 billion budget. The wall segment under construction is located within a 60-foot-wide strip of federally owned land known as the Roosevelt Reservation, which lies adjacent to the Tohono O’odham Nation’s territory. A federal judge recently approved the construction, ruling that the wall would be built entirely on this federally controlled land. However, the tribe argues that the presence of CBP agents and contractors on their land constitutes illegal trespassing, even if the actual wall is constructed on the federal parcel. Tribal officials claim that the contractors entered their territory to access the construction site, thereby violating tribal laws and encroaching upon culturally significant lands. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has approximately 37,000 members, some of whom reside in Mexico, filed a lawsuit in June to halt the wall’s construction. They contend that the project will irreparably harm the environment and destroy sacred landscapes, including mountain peaks central to their spiritual beliefs. The tribe has set up “No Trespassing” signs around the area, but CBP agents reportedly ignored these warnings and proceeded with the work, supported by armed personnel and vehicles blocking tribal law enforcement from intervening. According to drone footage released by the tribe, contractors arrived at the site with multiple vehicles and heavy equipment, including an industrial drill, suggesting initial steps toward preparing the ground for the wall. Tribal representatives described the scene as an act of unauthorized entry, emphasizing that the contractors were operating on their land without permission. Despite the lack of direct conflict, tensions remain high, with the tribe considering additional legal measures to challenge the ongoing work. CBP has defended the necessity of the wall, stating that the region is a critical smuggling corridor used by drug cartels and human traffickers. In a recent statement, CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott highlighted the dangers posed by the desert terrain, citing years of illicit activity, including drug trafficking and migrant fatalities. He emphasized that the wall would help mitigate these risks by securing a vulnerable portion of the border. The construction is being carried out by SLSCO Ltd., a Texas-based firm that has received more than $390 million in funding from the Department of Homeland Security since 2023. The company’s involvement underscores the scale of the administration’s commitment to expanding border infrastructure, despite the legal and cultural challenges faced in certain regions. The dispute reflects a broader national debate over the balance between national security concerns and the protection of indigenous rights and heritage. While the federal government insists that the wall is necessary to address border security threats, the Tohono O’odham Nation continues to push back, seeking legal remedies to prevent what they describe as an infringement on their sovereignty and sacred spaces. As the project moves forward, the tribe remains determined to challenge the construction through further litigation and advocacy.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

ABC News (US) logoABC News (US)IndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 602 days ago
Trump administration starts border wall project in Arizona over tribe's objections

The Trump administration has initiated construction of a section of the U.S.-Mexico border wall in southern Arizona, despite objections from the Tohono O'odham Nation, a Native American tribe. The project is part of a larger $46 billion initiative aimed at securing the border through physical barriers and technology. The tribe claims the construction violates their sovereignty and threatens sacred lands, while U.S. Customs and Border Protection argues the wall is necessary to address smuggling concerns. A federal court recently allowed the project to proceed, citing that the wall would be built on federally owned land within the Roosevelt Reservation. However, the tribe maintains that entering their territory to access the site constitutes illegal trespassing.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Trump administration's actions as justified based on national security concerns, emphasizing the administration's stance on border security. It presents the tribe's objections as challenges to the project rather than providing balanced coverage of the tribe's legal and ethical

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that the Trump administration began a border wall project in Arizona, citing U.S. Customs and Border Protection's claim that the area is a dangerous smuggling corridor. It also mentions the Tohono O'odham Nation's objection and the legal permitting by a federal judge.

Why objectivity (60): The article frames the project as a 'signature project' of the Trump administration and emphasizes the tribe's objections, potentially implying bias against the project. The tone leans toward highlighting opposition rather than presenting a neutral account of the situation.

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentCenter6 hr. ago
Green Card Update: Report Shows Applicants With Longest Wait Times

A new analysis by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) reveals significant backlogs in the U.S. employment-based immigration system, with some applicants facing waits of up to 179 years for permanent residency. The report focuses on the EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 categories, noting that professionals from India are expected to experience the longest delays due to visa caps and high demand. The backlog grew to 1.26 million people by December 2025, with India accounting for nearly 1 million of those waiting. The U.S. State Department acknowledged reaching annual visa limits and emphasized processing decisions based on statutory requirements and national security considerations. The Trump administration's policies, including stricter vetting and higher fees, have contributed to these challenges.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses immigration policy and its impact on specific groups, it presents information from both the NFAP report and the U.S. State Department without overtly favoring either side. It includes data on backlogs and mentions the Trump administration's policies but does not frame the

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories