ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 886 days agoThe article mentions Katja Koren, referred to as 'Vražja Slovenka,' who is running as a candidate for the right-wing party in the mayoral election in Maribor. The term 'Vražja Slovenka' translates to 'Slovenian Witch' and appears to be a nickname or label used for her. No further details are provided regarding her background, policies, or the broader context of the election.
Bias read (Center): The headline provides minimal information and does not exhibit clear ideological framing or biased language. The term 'Vražja Slovenka' could imply a negative connotation, but without additional context or commentary, it is difficult to determine if this reflects a specific ideological stance. As a
Why factuality (97): This article provides accurate and detailed information about Katja Koren's candidacy, including her role as a state secretary, her Olympic bronze medal, and her emphasis on sports values shaping her approach to politics. It also correctly notes her support from multiple parties in the governing coa
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting facts about Koren's background and political goals. It avoids overt bias but occasionally emphasizes her non-political identity, which could subtly frame her candidacy as different from traditional politicians.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 96Objective 876 days agoThe article mentions Katja Koren participating in a ski race related to the mayoral campaign in Maribor. No further details are provided in the available text.
Bias read (Center): The headline references a candidate (Katja Koren) involved in a local mayoral race, which is a political subject. However, there is no explicit framing, loaded language, or clear bias in the limited information provided. The lack of additional content prevents determining a stronger lean.
Why factuality (96): The article accurately describes Katja Koren's announcement of her candidacy, her background as a former athlete, and her choice of location for the campaign launch. It includes specific details about her achievements in skiing and her current position as a state secretary. The content aligns closel
Why objectivity (87): The article remains largely objective in its reporting, focusing on factual statements about Koren's career and political aspirations. However, it occasionally highlights her personal motivations and quotes that emphasize her non-political identity, which might slightly influence the reader's percep
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 95yesterdayOn October 19th, BK TV hosted a debate featuring candidates running for mayor of the City of Maribor. After the event, viewers were invited to participate in an online poll to vote for the candidate they found most convincing. The poll remained open until October 20th at 3 PM and received a total of 1,467 votes. Bor Greiner received the highest number of votes with 467 (32%), followed closely by Matevž Frangež with 437 votes (30%). Aleš Ernecl came in third with 137 votes (9%). The editorial team clarified that this was an internal survey conducted by Lokalec.si and not commissioned by any candidates, parties, or external entities. It emphasized that the results reflect only the opinions of Lokalec.si readers and cannot be generalized to the broader population.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the results of a viewer poll from a local news outlet without taking a stance on the candidates or their policies. It provides factual data on voting preferences and explicitly states that the survey is not representative of the general public but only reflects the views of the刊
Why factuality (95): This article focuses on introducing one of the mayoral candidates, Katja Koren, through a series of personal questions. It provides factual details about her education, income, property ownership, and lifestyle choices. These details are presented as direct quotes from the interview and are consiste
Why objectivity (95): The article is completely neutral in tone, presenting the information as given by the candidate without any editorializing or bias. It frames the content as an informative profile rather than an endorsement or critique.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 90yesterday Third part of the BK TV confrontation: The incinerator divided the mayoral candidates, from the demand for a referendum to the halt of the projectIn the third part of the debate between candidates for mayor of the City of Maribor on BK TV, the planned waste incineration plant was the central topic. Candidates presented differing views on its feasibility, environmental impact, heating costs, and citizen involvement in decision-making. Some candidates outright rejected the project, while others emphasized the need for expert analysis and economic justification before proceeding. Andrej Bauman highlighted the potential of the plant as a source of energy for district heating but stressed the importance of involving experts and citizens early in the planning process. Aleš Ernecl insisted that local residents' consent was essential, stating that if Tezna residents oppose it, the project should not proceed. Matevž Frangež opposed the city taking on the project unconditionally, emphasizing the direct impact on Tezna residents and announcing his intention to hold a binding referendum if elected. Bor Greiner clearly stated he would immediately halt the project, criticizing the lack of transparency regarding traffic and logistical impacts. Igor Jurišič strongly opposed the incineration plant, arguing that waste reduction should be the
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple candidates' positions on a controversial infrastructure project without overtly favoring any side. It includes balanced quotes from all participants, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the varied perspectives provided.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the third part of the debate as reported by other sources. It correctly attributes specific positions to candidates Bauman, Ernecl, and Frangež regarding the waste incinerator project, aligning with the general consensus found in Article 3 and 4 regarding Frangež's
Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral and journalistic. It presents conflicting viewpoints (support vs. opposition/conditions) without taking sides or using emotionally charged language.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 902 days ago Arsenovich sent a message to the ten mayoral candidatesSaša Arsenovič, bivši župan Maribora, je na slovesnosti ob dnevu Maribora izrazil svoje mnenje o tem, kakšen vodja mesta potrebuje. Po njemu mora župan imeti jasno vizijo, izkušnje, pogum in neodvisnost ter zmožnost sprejemati odločitve in jih podpirati z rezultati. Poudaril je, da vodenje mesta zahteva predanost in iskreno zavezanost razvoju mesta in dobrobiti prebivalcev. Arsenovič je tudi opozoril, da župan ne sme biti poslanstvo ali način za reševanje lastne eksistence. Na lokalnih volitvah v Mariboru se bo za župansko mando potegovalo deset kandidatov iz različnih političnih strani.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Arsenovič's views on the qualities needed for a mayor of Maribor but does not take a clear stance or favor any specific candidate or political ideology. It quotes his opinions directly without editorializing or emphasizing one side over another.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Saša Arsenovič's speech at a ceremony where he outlined his vision for Maribor's mayor. It lists all ten candidates running for the position and provides their political affiliations. All information aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles about the
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, quoting Arsenovič directly without adding personal commentary. While it does highlight his views, it does so objectively without taking sides or using emotionally charged language.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 906 days agoMatej Vodopivec has officially submitted his candidacy for mayor of Maribor. Alongside this, he presented his list of candidates and emphasized his desire for a more equitable development across all parts of the city.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a candidate's formal submission for a local election position and outlines their stated goals. There is no evident framing that favors one side over another; the content remains neutral in tone and does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (95): This article provides detailed information about Matej Vodopivec's formal submission of his candidacy for mayor, including his party affiliation, platform, and list of candidates. These facts are consistent with the cross-source consensus and appear to be accurately reported without embellishment or
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a largely objective tone, presenting Vodopivec's statements and policies without apparent bias. It focuses on factual reporting of his campaign promises and actions, avoiding subjective language or editorializing.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 866 days ago Katja Koren presented her candidacy: First I have to look at what is happening in the municipalityKatja Koren, former top ski racer and state secretary, has announced her candidacy for mayor of the City of Maribor. During a press event on Mount Pohorje, she emphasized her belief in her knowledge and experience but stated that her first priority would be to assess the current situation in the municipality, listen to residents, and then develop solutions. She did not provide specific plans or projects at this stage, noting that understanding existing problems such as traffic issues and financial challenges is crucial before taking action. Koren mentioned the need to improve infrastructure, including traffic management and green spaces, but did not outline concrete measures yet. She also indicated that she intends to form a team based on the identified challenges and needs.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of Katja Koren's announcement and her approach to addressing Maribor's challenges without showing clear favoritism toward any particular political stance. It focuses on her statements and does not present biased language or selective information.
Why factuality (94): The article accurately conveys Katja Koren's announcement of her candidacy, her decision to focus on understanding the city before implementing policies, and her acknowledgment of challenges facing Maribor. While it lacks some specific details found in other sources, it still presents a coherent and
Why objectivity (86): The article maintains a neutral tone by focusing on Koren's stated intentions and lack of concrete plans. However, it occasionally frames her approach as cautious or uncertain, which could subtly shape the reader's interpretation of her readiness for the role.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 952 days ago In the mayoral race, viewers voted for Bor Greiner.A debate between candidates for mayor of the City of Maribor was broadcast on BK TV, allowing viewers to participate in a live poll by scanning a QR code. Viewers could vote for the candidate they found most convincing based on their responses, positions, and performance. Bor Greiner received the most votes, securing 115 out of 463 total votes cast, which accounted for 24.8% of all votes. Andrej Bauman came in second with 101 votes (21.8%), followed by Matevž Frangež with 96 votes (20.7%). The remaining candidates received significantly fewer votes. It was emphasized that this viewer poll is not a representative opinion survey and does not predict the outcome of the upcoming mayoral election.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the results of a live viewer poll during a televised debate among mayoral candidates in Maribor. It provides factual data on the number of votes each candidate received without showing any clear ideological bias or selective emphasis. The article explicitly states that the poll,
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the results of the viewer poll conducted after the televised debate, stating Bor Greiner received the most votes. It also includes important caveats that this is not a scientifically valid survey and cannot predict election outcomes. The numbers match those reported in
Why objectivity (95): The article remains neutral and factual, clearly explaining the nature of the poll and its limitations. It avoids any subjective interpretation of the results and presents them as they are, without bias or emotional language.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 856 days agoRepresentatives of the List for Fair Development of Urban Districts and Local Communities (LPR) submitted the candidacy of Matej Vodopivec for mayor of the City Municipality of Maribor today. This indicates that Vodopivec is now officially running for the position of mayor. The LPR is positioning him as their candidate in the upcoming local elections. The article does not provide further details about his platform, background, or other potential candidates.
Bias read (Center): The article reports a straightforward fact, Vodopivec's candidacy submission by the LPR, with no evident framing, loaded language, or omission of context. It provides minimal information and does not take a stance on the candidate or the political group.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes Matej Vodopivec's candidacy and his campaign platform, as well as Igor Jurišič's candidacy and the Green Youth Party's approach. It includes relevant quotes and details that match the cross-source consensus, with no significant discrepancies.
Why objectivity (85): The article presents both candidates fairly, giving them equal attention in terms of space and tone. However, the inclusion of a quote from Katja Koren adds a slightly more colorful tone, which might subtly influence perception, though it does not strongly favor either candidate.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 856 days ago Matej Vodopivec and LPR also applied in MariborThe local political group 'Lista za pravičen razvoj mestnih četrti in krajevnih skupnosti' (LPR), along with candidate Matej Vodopivec for mayor of Maribor, has submitted candidacies for both the mayoral position and for all city districts and local communities. The LPR has also submitted lists for the City Council of Maribor. Vodopivec, who is supported by the Preroda and Pirate Party, emphasized the importance of inclusive governance and highlighted the work done in the district of Studenc, which he led for four years. He stated that the LPR aims for fair and just development across all parts of the city, not just the central areas. The list includes various professionals such as doctors, engineers, teachers, and other residents committed to improving the city.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the LPR's candidacy and their policies without overtly favoring any particular side. It quotes Vodopivec directly and mentions his coalition partners but does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (90): The article confirms that LPR submitted candidate lists for both the mayoral election and local council elections, along with Matej Vodopivec's candidacy. It also mentions his coalition with Preroda and Pirates, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. Some minor details are less elaborated com
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains mostly neutral, though there is a slight emphasis on Vodopivec’s leadership experience and the values of LPR. While not overtly biased, the phrasing occasionally suggests a subtle favoring of Vodopivec's perspective.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 952 days ago Which of the candidates for mayor of the City of Maribor convinced you the most during the BK TV interview?The article presents a poll conducted by Lokalec.si asking readers which candidate for mayor of the City of Maribor was most convincing during a debate on BK TV. The candidates include Bor Greiner, Aleš Ernecl, Matevž Frangež, Matej Vodopivec, Andrej Bauman, Andrej Matvoz, and Igor Jurišič, with vote percentages and counts provided. The poll is open until October 20, 2026, and viewers are encouraged to watch the debate. The editorial note clarifies that this is a self-initiated online survey among Lokalec.si readers, not a representative public opinion study, and results cannot be generalized beyond those who participated.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a non-partisan poll of reader opinions on local politics, with no evident framing bias. It clearly states that the poll is not commissioned by any candidates or parties and explicitly warns against generalizing the results. The content remains neutral in tone and does not favor,
Why factuality (85): The article presents a poll conducted by Lokalec.si asking readers which candidate they found most convincing after a televised debate. The results show Bor Greiner received the most votes. However, the article clearly states this is not a representative public opinion survey but rather a reflection
Why objectivity (95): The article is highly objective, presenting only the poll question, results, and clear disclaimer that it is not a scientific survey. There is no editorializing, bias, or emotional language. It simply reports what was done and what the results were.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago (VIDEO and PHOTOS) Maribor mayoral candidates at the evening quiz: Some counted on their fingers, others sweatedThe article discusses a quiz held by the Slovenian newspaper Večer, where candidates running for the position of mayor of Maribor competed against each other. The quiz tested their knowledge of Maribor, covering topics such as football, history, local businesses, and music. The winning team was led by Igor Jurišič. The piece highlights various moments from the event, including how some candidates struggled with questions, had to count on their fingers, or even resorted to guessing. It also mentions specific incidents involving candidates like Bor Greiner, who attended alone, and others who faced challenges during the quiz.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral account of a quiz involving political candidates, focusing on their performance and interactions without overtly favoring any candidate or ideology. There is no clear framing that suggests a particular political bias.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a quiz involving mayoral candidates in Maribor, stating that Igor Jurišič's team won. This aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles, which focus on Matej Vodopivec's candidacy and campaign but do not contradict this claim. The details about the quiz format an
Why objectivity (80): The tone is generally neutral and journalistic, focusing on describing the quiz and its outcomes without overt bias. However, some phrases like 'nekateri so šteli na prste, drugi cepetali' suggest a light-hearted, possibly opinionated commentary rather than strict neutrality.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday The mayoral candidates in person: who is Katja Koren? (video)Maribor24 has decided to present all mayoral candidates in Maribor differently by focusing not just on their political programs and promises but also on personal questions that reveal the person behind the political role. This time, they asked Katja Koren, a former ski racer, entrepreneur, state secretary, and mayoral candidate, more personal questions. Koren discussed her education, monthly income, property ownership, family status, and personal habits. She mentioned she is a graduate in management, earns around €3,800 per month, owns a house where she lives with her two daughters, drives a service car, and is divorced with two adult children. She admitted to being late often and enjoys chocolate the most. She emphasized that she is open about herself and would not hide anything.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral interview with a political candidate, focusing on personal aspects rather than political positions or controversial issues. It does not show clear bias toward any side and provides direct quotes from the candidate without editorializing.
Why factuality (85): This article focuses on a personal profile interview rather than the main policy debate covered by the other texts. While likely accurate within its own scope, it provides little overlap with the core 'event' (the policy clash/incinerator debate) described in the other articles, making direct cross-
Why objectivity (75): The format is inherently subjective as it relies on self-reported answers from the candidate. However, the questions asked are standard for such profiles. There is no overt bias, but the focus on personal life diverts from objective policy analysis.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 806 days ago Katja Koren officially enters the mayoral battleKatja Koren, former athlete and Olympic medalist, has officially become a candidate for mayor of Maribor. She previously competed in sports and won an Olympic medal before transitioning into politics. Her candidacy marks her formal entry into local governance, aiming to lead the city of Maribor.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward announcement of Katja Koren becoming a mayoral candidate. It does not include any biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The focus is purely on the fact that she has entered the race, without any ideological framing.
Why factuality (80): The article gives clear information about Katja Koren's candidacy, her political affiliations, and her motivations. The details are consistent with standard political reporting and align with the general narrative from other sources. While no direct primary source is available, the facts presented s
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting Katja Koren's motivations and political support objectively. There is no strong bias or emotional language, though the focus on her personal connection to Maribor may subtly frame her as more 'local' compared to other candidates.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 9019 hr. agoMatevž Frangež, the joint candidate for mayor of Maribor representing the Social Democrats (SD), Left, and Cyclists and Pedestrians List, presented his coalition’s ten-year development program titled 'Alliance for New Maribor.' The plan aims to create 100 new companies and 10,000 jobs by establishing a regional development program to accelerate EU funding usage, building a national development park near the airport, and launching a startup city initiative. Housing strategies include incentivizing the use of existing vacant properties, accelerating public rental construction, and transparent land sales for affordable market housing. Quality of life improvements involve revitalizing empty spaces, creating creative districts, improving sports facilities, and doubling participatory budget funds. Traffic measures propose temporary parking solutions, traffic flow optimization, and studying options for a tunnel under the city center along with Park-and-Ride areas. Environmental goals include connecting all households to water networks by 2030, implementing rainwater collection systems, planting new trees, and enhancing protection for the Stražun area.
Bias read (Progressive): The article exclusively features the platform of a left-wing coalition candidate (SD, Levica, List cyclists/pedestrians). It presents their specific policy proposals regarding social housing, environmental sustainability, and urban development without including counter-arguments or platforms from a
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): Maintains a professional news tone. It quotes the candidate directly and describes the program's contents without injecting editorial judgment on the feasibility or desirability of the plans.
Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 9022 hr. ago Frangež presented a concrete programme for the new development ambition of MariborMatevž Frangež, the joint mayoral candidate for the Alliance for New Maribor, presented a development program for the 2026-2030 period. The coalition, consisting of Levica, the Cyclists and Pedestrians List, and the Social Democrats, prioritizes economic growth, housing accessibility, and improved living conditions. Key proposals include creating 10,000 new jobs through 100 new companies, establishing a national development park near the airport, and launching a startup city initiative. In the housing sector, the plan focuses on activating vacant properties and accelerating the construction of affordable rental units, though specific numerical targets were not provided. Traffic measures involve optimizing parking, adjusting public transit, expanding bike-sharing, and studying the feasibility of a tunnel under the city center.
Bias read (Progressive): The article reports on a political coalition explicitly identified by its constituent parties (Levica, Social Democrats), which are positioned on the left wing of the Slovenian political spectrum. The framing highlights social democratic priorities such as affordable housing, public infrastructure,,
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): Objective reporting style. It presents the candidate's ambitious goals and proposed solutions as stated facts of the campaign program, using direct quotes where appropriate, without evaluating the likelihood of success or criticizing the proposals.
Nova24TVParty-alignedConservative2 hr. agoThis opinion piece criticizes Matevž Frangež, a candidate for mayor of Maribor from the Social Democrats (SD), arguing he lacks basic knowledge of the city's administrative boundaries. The author points out that Frangež proposed developing a park at Maribor Airport, which is located in the municipality of Hoče-Slivnica rather than Maribor itself, suggesting this indicates ignorance of his potential jurisdiction. Additionally, the article notes that Frangež has lived in Jarenina, part of the Pesnica municipality, for twelve years, questioning his familiarity with daily life in Maribor. The text further highlights that Frangež, who was previously a state secretary in the Golob government, is currently unemployed but receives a monthly salary replacement of approximately 4,300 euros, describing this as receiving taxpayer money for no work.
Bias read (Conservative): The article employs highly critical and sarcastic language ('Narobe svet', 'nerodno vprašanje') to attack a specific political candidate from the center-left Social Democrats (SD). It emphasizes negative personal attributes such as lack of local knowledge and financial status (unemployment benefits)
Slovenia
