This is why the Croats were eliminated from the World Cup (VIDEO)

Večernje novostiParty-alignedCenter23 hr. ago

The article reports on a controversial goal disallowed during the FIFA World Cup quarter-final match between Croatia and Portugal. The game ended in a 2-1 victory for Portugal after a dramatic last-minute decision. Croatian player Ivan Perišić delivered a cross from the left wing, which hit the chest of Croatia’s defender Josip Gvardiol before bouncing toward the goal. However, the goal was ruled out due to an offside call involving Croatia’s player Marko Pjaca, who had touched the ball prior to the play. The decision was based on a sensor inside the ball that detected contact, leading to the offside ruling. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the technology used to make the call and suggests that if the contact had not occurred, the goal would have been valid.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event as a sports-related controversy without overt political framing. It focuses on the technical aspects of the goal decision and does not take a clear ideological stance. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the outcome of the match and the implications of the technology

Večernje novostiParty-alignedCenter23 hr. ago

The article discusses a controversial moment during Croatia's match against Portugal at the World Cup, where a goal was disallowed due to an offside call. Croatian players believed they had scored an equalizer when Josko Gvardiol scored after a pass from Petar Sučić. However, it was later determined that Igor Matanović had slightly touched the ball before it reached Sučić, who was in an offside position. This contact was detected by a chip embedded in the ball used during the tournament. Matanović, speaking after the game, admitted he felt a slight touch but was unsure if it constituted a handball. He expressed disappointment over Croatia’s elimination from the World Cup, calling the result unfair despite acknowledging their strong second-half performance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event objectively, focusing on the technical aspects of the play and quoting Matanović's statements without overtly criticizing or praising any side. It does not take a clear ideological stance and remains focused on the sports narrative.