Business owners in Denmark, Western Australia, are concerned that a directive from the Shire of Denmark to remove certain roadside signs could negatively impact their tourist-driven businesses. The signs, which direct visitors to local shops and cafes, are seen as essential for attracting customers in a town that sees tens of thousands of tourists annually. The Shire claims the signs pose safety risks on high-speed, high-traffic roads and has given businesses 28 days to remove them or face enforcement. Business owner Brendan Laing argues that removing the signs would reduce visibility for his café and leather shop, particularly since the location lacks foot traffic. While the Shire acknowledges the need for safety, it maintains that the signs are located within the road area and that such practices are 'never acceptable.' The dispute highlights tensions between local governance and the interests of small businesses reliant on tourism.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: business owners argue the signs are vital for tourism and economic activity, while the Shire emphasizes safety concerns and regulatory compliance. There is no clear ideological slant toward either side, and the reporting appears balanced in presenting the two-



