Marc Brittain, a prominent English barrister, finds himself embroiled in a complex and contentious legal battle that spans both the United Kingdom and Croatia. At the heart of this dispute is a serious allegation of attempted strangulation by Brittain against his ex-wife, Tamara Katavic, during a period of marital strife. The case has escalated into a potential extradition request, with Brittain facing up to three years in prison should he be sent to Croatia for a criminal trial. This situation has sparked a dramatic confrontation between the two individuals, each accusing the other of dishonesty and deceit.
The conflict began in late 2021 when Brittain returned home from a jog at their residence in Croatia to discover that his wife had emptied his bank account. This financial maneuvering, coupled with a heated argument, led to Brittain’s arrest on charges of attempting to strangle Katavic. According to Brittain, the incident occurred on December 3, 2021, when he was allegedly charged with assault after leaving the house. He claims that upon returning, he found his accounts drained and that Katavic had orchestrated his removal from the premises. During this time, Brittain was detained for several days, though he was eventually released with his passport seized for seven months.
Brittain has consistently denied the allegations of physical harm, insisting that he did not place his hands around Katavic’s throat and that he had not raised his voice toward her. He further asserts that Katovic fabricated the incident, claiming that she was unable to distinguish truth from falsehood and that she exhibited traits consistent with a “mild psychopath.” These accusations come as part of broader legal battles involving the division of assets, including the disputed £85,000 that Brittain claims Katavic took from his bank account, and a £60,000 maintenance payment he believes she is owed.
The couple, who were married for 15 years and shared a child, experienced multiple separations and frequent police interventions due to their volatile relationship. Their final separation in December 2021 marked the beginning of a prolonged legal struggle that has spanned both jurisdictions. In addition to the criminal charges, Brittain has pursued civil remedies, seeking the return of the funds he claims were improperly taken and a share of a London flat owned by Katavic.
In a recent court appearance, Brittain represented himself before Mr Justice Morris, expressing his frustration with the legal process and his fear of being sent to Croatia. He described the situation as one where he was “taken completely by surprise” and emphasized that he had done nothing wrong. His testimony included claims that Katavic lived a double life, engaging in relationships with other men and managing a concierge business without his knowledge.
Katavic, meanwhile, maintains that she has suffered years of domestic abuse at the hands of Brittain, including threats to destroy their home. She has presented these claims in legal proceedings, leading to the criminal charges against her former spouse. The psychological evaluation conducted in Croatia reportedly concluded that Katavic lacked the ability to discern truth from lies, reinforcing her position that Brittain’s actions were violent and unprovoked.
As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome will likely hinge on the evidence presented regarding the nature of the alleged assault and the validity of the financial claims. The case highlights the complexities of international family law and the personal toll such disputes can take on individuals. With both parties asserting their version of events, the resolution remains uncertain, pending further judicial review and potentially more detailed evidence.
2 reports
Daily MailIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 557 days agoA British barrister, Marc Brittain, is facing extradition to Croatia where he could serve up to three years in prison on charges related to alleged domestic abuse against his ex-wife, Tamara Katavic. Katavic claims Brittain attempted to strangle her and threatened to burn their home during their 15-year marriage, which ended in 2021. Brittain denies these allegations, calling his wife a 'psychopath' and 'liar,' and asserts that she cleared his bank account and fabricated the accusations to remove him from the household. He claims he was arrested and detained for several days after the incident, with his passport confiscated for seven months. Both parties are involved in ongoing legal battles over property ownership and financial matters, with Brittain accusing Katavic of dishonesty and leading a 'double life.'
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the dispute through the perspective of Marc Brittain, emphasizing his denial of the abuse allegations and labeling his ex-wife as a 'psychopath' and 'liar.' This portrayal aligns with a right-leaning narrative that prioritizes individual accountability and challenges personal accu
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): Factuality is moderate as the article reports conflicting allegations from both parties without clear evidence. It mentions the legal proceedings and financial disputes but does not clarify if these claims have been substantiated. Objectivity is low due to the use of emotionally charged terms like '
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 507 days agoA prominent UK barrister, Marc Brittain, is facing potential extradition to Croatia where he could serve up to three years in prison on charges of attempted strangulation during a contentious international divorce battle. The case involves allegations of financial misconduct and domestic abuse, with Brittain denying the accusations and labeling his ex-wife Tamara Katavic as a 'liar' and 'psychopath.' The couple, who were married for 15 years and had a child, separated in 2021, leading to multiple legal battles over property and finances. Brittain claims he did not physically harm his wife and asserts that she fabricated the assault claim after clearing his bank account. He alleges she led a double life, including engaging in relationships with other men and operating a concierge business without his knowledge. The case highlights the complexities of cross-border legal disputes and personal conflicts.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a personal legal dispute involving international elements, it presents both parties' perspectives without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains balanced, presenting allegations from both the husband and wife without clear ideological leaning. The focus is on the law
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 50): Factuality is somewhat lower as it repeats similar unverified accusations without providing context or resolution. The article leans towards presenting the barrister's side with phrases like 'they want to bang me up,' suggesting a lack of balance. Objectivity is poor due to the repetitive use of str
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United Kingdom
