ON
← Back to feed
 Too big to fail regulation tougher bonus rules Federal Council wants to rein in top banks
CH🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 days ago

Too big to fail regulation tougher bonus rules Federal Council wants to rein in top banks

The Swiss Federal Council has proposed stricter regulations to hold bank executives accountable and reduce risks associated with high bonuses. These measures aim to close gaps in the 'too big to fail' (TBTF) regulatory framework, particularly in light of the collapse of Credit Suisse. The proposals include introducing a responsibility regime for banks with over 250 employees, imposing multi-year restrictions on variable compensation for top executives, and allowing bonuses to be clawed back if they incentivized excessive risk-taking. Additionally, the Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma) would gain new powers, including the ability to impose fines up to 10% of a bank’s annual operating result. The Swiss National Bank (SNB) and Finma have welcomed these proposals, calling them essential for addressing regulatory weaknesses exposed by the Credit Suisse crisis and strengthening financial stability.

The Swiss federal council has proposed stricter regulations aimed at curbing excessive bonuses and holding bank executives more accountable, following the collapse of Credit Suisse. The measures include introducing a multi-year lock-in period for variable compensation payments to top earners and high-paid employees across all banks, with provisions allowing for the clawback of bonuses under certain conditions. These proposals were announced during a media conference by Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter and are intended to close gaps in the “too big to fail” (TBTF) regulatory framework. The initiative follows the financial crisis triggered by Credit Suisse’s failure, which exposed vulnerabilities in the banking sector and raised concerns over public finances, economic stability, and state support. The federal council plans to introduce a responsibility regime within the Banking Act for institutions employing more than 250 staff. This would require clear designation of individuals responsible for specific decisions, aiming to improve corporate culture and risk management practices. Additionally, the Federal Council wants to enhance the stabilization and resolution plans for systemically important banks, ensuring they have better access to liquid funds from the central bank. The proposed rules also aim to prevent taxpayers, the economy, and the state from bearing financial risks again, similar to those faced after the Credit Suisse debacle. The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma) and the Swiss National Bank (SNB) have welcomed the new proposals. In a statement, the SNB emphasized that the measures are crucial for addressing regulatory weaknesses revealed by the Credit Suisse crisis and for strengthening the stability of Switzerland’s financial system. It specifically highlighted the updated liquidity regulation as a key component. Finma echoed these sentiments, calling the measures essential for reinforcing bank stability and the reputation of the Swiss financial center. It also stressed the importance of implementing the proposals as a comprehensive package to achieve optimal results. Under the revised liquidity ordinance, the federal council intends to set quantitative minimum requirements for system-relevant and mid-sized banks regarding secured liquidity drawdowns from the central bank. Smaller banks are excluded from this requirement. The proposal also grants Finma additional powers, including the ability to impose fines up to ten percent of a bank's annual operating result. Early interventions are planned to protect customers' interests, while the authority will gain greater transparency into completed enforcement procedures. The proposals include a ban on incentive-based bonuses that encourage excessively risky behavior. Variable pay for senior executives and highly compensated staff will face a mandatory waiting period before being paid out. This measure aims to align executive incentives with long-term stability rather than short-term gains. The federal council had previously outlined these ideas in June 2025, indicating a continued focus on reforming the banking sector to prevent future crises. The government is seeking public input through a consultation process, inviting feedback from stakeholders, including financial institutions, industry representatives, and the general public. The consultation period allows for further refinement of the proposals before finalizing them. The federal council expects the measures to contribute to a more resilient banking system, reduce systemic risks, and restore confidence in the financial sector. The reforms reflect a broader effort to ensure that the banking sector operates responsibly and transparently, safeguarding both public interest and economic stability.

2 reports

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 8011 days ago
Too big to fail regulation tougher bonus rules Federal Council wants to rein in top banks

The Swiss Federal Council has proposed stricter regulations to hold bank executives accountable and reduce risks associated with high bonuses. These measures aim to close gaps in the 'too big to fail' (TBTF) regulatory framework, particularly in light of the collapse of Credit Suisse. The proposals include introducing a responsibility regime for banks with over 250 employees, imposing multi-year restrictions on variable compensation for top executives, and allowing bonuses to be clawed back if they incentivized excessive risk-taking. Additionally, the Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma) would gain new powers, including the ability to impose fines up to 10% of a bank’s annual operating result. The Swiss National Bank (SNB) and Finma have welcomed these proposals, calling them essential for addressing regulatory weaknesses exposed by the Credit Suisse crisis and strengthening financial stability.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the Federal Council's proposal as a balanced effort to improve banking regulation without overtly favoring either left or right-wing perspectives. It focuses on factual descriptions of the proposed measures, their goals, and the reactions of official institutions like the SNB. S

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed and accurate information about the federal council’s proposals, including specific measures like the accountability regime for banks with over 250 employees. It cites Finanzministerin Karin Keller-Sutter and references the Credit Suisse collapse as the trigger. The con

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without strong emotional language. It balances the discussion by explaining both the rationale behind the regulations and the potential impact on financial stability. There is no clear bias toward any particular political stance.

watson logowatsonIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7011 days ago
Risk bonuses and crisis management: how the Federal Council wants to regulate banks

The Swiss Federal Council has proposed new regulations aimed at improving risk management and crisis handling within banks. The proposal includes measures such as risk bonuses and stricter oversight mechanisms to ensure financial stability. These changes come in response to growing concerns over the resilience of the banking sector amid economic uncertainties. The initiative seeks to enhance transparency and accountability among financial institutions, potentially influencing future regulatory frameworks in Switzerland.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the proposed regulations neutrally, focusing on the objectives and potential impacts of the Federal Council's initiative without overtly favoring any particular political stance or ideology.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the Swiss federal council's proposed regulations targeting large banks, including measures to hold executives accountable and improve crisis preparedness. It references the collapse of Credit Suisse as the catalyst and aligns with the cross-source consensus on these re

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly towards supporting stricter regulation of banks, particularly highlighting the need to prevent 'too big to fail' scenarios. While not overtly biased, the emphasis on holding bank executives accountable may reflect a broader public sentiment rather than purely objective report

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories