ON
← Back to feed
TNCC president Manickam Tagore opposes proposed charges on Jan Dhan account withdrawals
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

TNCC president Manickam Tagore opposes proposed charges on Jan Dhan account withdrawals

B. Manickam Tagore, President of the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC), has opposed a proposed fee on withdrawals from basic savings accounts known as Jan Dhan accounts. According to Tagore, the Union government plans to impose a charge of ₹15 plus 18% GST on withdrawals exceeding four times a month, with the State Bank of India setting the cost at ₹17.70 per transaction starting October 1. Tagore claims this proposal has been approved by the Reserve Bank of India and could affect millions of low-income individuals who rely on these accounts. He criticized the government's focus on digital payments, arguing that the fees might force those without consistent internet or electricity access back to cash transactions. Tagore also highlighted the increase in cash circulation since 2017, despite efforts to promote digital transactions after demonetization in 2016, and noted that banks have waived significant loan amounts for large businesses while proposing charges on poor account holders.

Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) president B. Manickam Tagore has publicly opposed the proposed introduction of charges on withdrawals from Jan Dhan accounts, accusing the Union government of placing financial burdens on low-income individuals. On Saturday, August 22, 2026, Tagore stated that the government was planning to impose fees on frequent withdrawals from basic savings accounts, potentially affecting millions of vulnerable users. According to his statement, the proposed charges would include a penalty of ₹15, along with 18% Goods and Services Tax (GST), making each withdrawal cost approximately ₹17.70. The measure, he claimed, would take effect starting October 1, 2026. Tagore cited the State Bank of India (SBI) as the first major institution to announce its intention to implement the new policy. He noted that SBI’s decision would set a precedent for other banks to follow, as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had already given its approval. This move, according to Tagore, would apply to all basic savings accounts, including those under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY). These accounts were initially launched in 2005 as “No Frills Accounts” under the administration of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh before being rebranded by the current government. The Tamil Nadu leader emphasized that PMJDY had played a crucial role in expanding financial inclusion, particularly among marginalized communities. He pointed out that nearly 56 crore such accounts have been opened nationwide, with approximately 53 crore held by public sector banks. Tagore argued that the imposition of these charges would undermine the very purpose of the scheme, which aimed to provide affordable banking services to the economically disadvantaged. In addition to criticizing the proposed withdrawal fees, Tagore expressed concerns about the government’s broader strategy toward digital payments. He highlighted that the rise in cash circulation, from roughly ₹9 lakh crore in January 2017 to ₹43 lakh crore today, contradicted efforts to promote digital transactions. This increase, he suggested, might be attributed to the difficulty many citizens face in accessing reliable internet or electricity, especially in rural areas. Furthermore, Tagore accused the government of adopting a double standard in its financial policies. He claimed that banks had collectively waived loans totaling ₹16 lakh crore for large corporate entities over the past decade, while simultaneously attempting to impose additional costs on small account holders. This discrepancy, he argued, reflected a lack of genuine commitment to supporting the common citizen. The controversy surrounding the proposed charges has sparked discussions within political circles and among financial institutions. While some officials have defended the measures as necessary for maintaining operational sustainability, others have echoed Tagore’s concerns about their impact on lower-income populations. As the debate continues, the final outcome will likely depend on how regulatory bodies respond to growing public sentiment and potential legal challenges.

1 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 65yesterday
TNCC president Manickam Tagore opposes proposed charges on Jan Dhan account withdrawals

B. Manickam Tagore, President of the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC), has opposed a proposed fee on withdrawals from basic savings accounts known as Jan Dhan accounts. According to Tagore, the Union government plans to impose a charge of ₹15 plus 18% GST on withdrawals exceeding four times a month, with the State Bank of India setting the cost at ₹17.70 per transaction starting October 1. Tagore claims this proposal has been approved by the Reserve Bank of India and could affect millions of low-income individuals who rely on these accounts. He criticized the government's focus on digital payments, arguing that the fees might force those without consistent internet or electricity access back to cash transactions. Tagore also highlighted the increase in cash circulation since 2017, despite efforts to promote digital transactions after demonetization in 2016, and noted that banks have waived significant loan amounts for large businesses while proposing charges on poor account holders.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism of a proposed government policy affecting low-income citizens, highlighting concerns about financial burdens on vulnerable populations. The framing emphasizes opposition to the policy from a prominent political figure, suggesting a critique of the current government's议

Why factuality (75): The article reports allegations by Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president B. Manickam Tagore regarding proposed charges on Jan Dhan account withdrawals. It cites specific figures like ₹15 + 18% GST, ₹17.70 per transaction, and references the State Bank of India's announcement. The claim about RBI a

Why objectivity (65): The article presents Tagore's criticisms as factual assertions, using emotionally charged language such as 'burden poor and ordinary bank account holders' and 'pushing people... back towards cash transactions.' While it provides context about the policy change, it frames the issue from the perspecti

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories