The article discusses the management of the Jakuševec landfill in Zagreb, which is owned by the city but currently managed by four private companies—HIS, Tigra, Eko-Flor Plus, and C.I.A.K.—through a series of contracts dating back to 2018. The current contract, signed four years ago, has now expired, and the city is launching a new tender valued at 50 million euros (excluding VAT), double the previous amount, seeking a new manager for the period 2026–2030. The existing contractors have been responsible for construction, maintenance, and operation of various systems within the landfill, including drainage, wastewater disposal, gas collection, and energy production. Recent issues such as odor complaints, visible footage of poor conditions, and landslides caused by water retention and drainage problems have raised concerns. These incidents led to injuries and significant damage, highlighting ongoing challenges in managing the site, which continues to receive approximately 350,000 cubic meters of waste annually. The landfill, covering around 54 hectares once fully filled, is considered an active construction site due to continuous waste input.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the management structure and financial aspects of the Jakuševec landfill without overtly criticizing or praising any particular political entity or ideology. It provides data on past contracts, current tender values, and operational challenges without a
Why factuality (75): The article provides detailed information about the ongoing tender process for managing the Jakuševec landfill, including the value of the contract, the participating companies, and historical contracts. It references past agreements and current activities, aligning with the cross-source consensus t
Why objectivity (65): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards highlighting the complexity and scale of the operations managed by private companies. While factual, there is a subtle emphasis on the role of these companies, which might suggest an underlying perspective on the efficiency or necessity of private m




