Hajduk Split has secured its place in the second round of the UEFA Europa League after a narrow 2:1 victory over Žilina in Slovakia. The result was enough to advance past the first qualifying round despite the away defeat, setting up a challenging two-legged tie against Cypriot side Pafos. The first leg will take place on July 23 at Stadion Poljud, with the return match scheduled for July 30 in Cyprus. The Croatian club's progression comes amid ongoing preparations for the new season, which includes several transfers and internal dynamics affecting team cohesion. The first leg encounter against Žilina saw Hajduk face early challenges. They fell behind in the second minute of extra time due to a goal by Alec Van Hoorenbeeck. However, the visitors equalized through Marko Roginić in the 53rd minute before Dario Melnjak scored an unexpected own goal in the first minute of added time to secure the win. The match highlighted both resilience and defensive vulnerabilities, with coach Gonzalo Garcia making several substitutions during the game. Hajduk’s squad has undergone significant changes ahead of the new campaign. Four players have already left the club, while at least two more are expected to depart. To date, six new signings have joined the ranks: Alberto del Moral, Etnik Brruti, Mathieu Acapandié, Andjelo Šutalo, Alec Van Hoorenbeeck, and Dalisson de Almeida. Reports suggest a seventh addition could soon follow, potentially involving Emanuel Ekong, a 24-year-old winger from Sweden currently playing for Malmö FF. Ekong, who previously played for Empoli, Perugia, and Istria 1961, has a contract with Malmö until 2029 and is valued at €450,000 on Transfermarkt. The club's financial situation appears stable following their qualification for the Europa League. UEFA provides each participant in the qualifying rounds with €175,000, meaning Hajduk has already earned this amount from the first round. With the advancement to the second round, they received additional compensation, bringing their total earnings from European competitions in July alone to €350,000. This financial boost adds pressure on the team to perform well in the upcoming matches against Pafos, known for their strong performances in last season’s Champions League qualifiers. Internal tensions within the squad remain unresolved. Marko Livaja, one of the club's star players, faced criticism after being accused of violating disciplinary rules during pre-season training in Slovenia. Despite initial speculation about his potential departure, the club confirmed he would remain for the upcoming season. Coach Gonzalo Garcia, however, continues to face scrutiny regarding his relationship with Livaja, with fans rating him poorly in a recent poll assessing player performances. As Hajduk prepares for the crucial matches against Pafos, the focus shifts to both tactical adjustments and maintaining unity among the players. The challenge posed by the Cypriot side, who finished 26th in the Champions League group stage last season, underscores the need for consistent performance and strategic planning. With the first leg approaching, all eyes will be on how the team handles these pressures and whether the anticipated reinforcements can make a difference in the coming weeks.
4 reports
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8015 days agoHajduk Zagreb je uspješno prošao prvi kola Europske lige, osiguravajući prolazak nakon pobjede 2:0 na Poljudu i poraze u gostima protiv Žiline. U drugom pretkolu čeka ih dvije utakmice protiv ciparskog Pafosa, koji je prošle sezone igrao u Ligi prvaka i završio 26. u ligaškoj fazi. Hajduk trenutno ima šansu za nastavak u Europi, ali njihov zadatak smatra se teže nego u prethodnom kolu. Poraz bi mogao rezultirati njihovim spustom u treće pretkolo Konferencijske lige.
Bias read (Center): Tematika članka nije politička već sportska, stoga nema političkog nagona. Vrijednosti koje se navode su objektivne i ne pokazuju preferencu ni jedne strane.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately summarizes the match, including key moments and player contributions. It cites the coach’s comments and provides a clear timeline of events. It stays true to the primary source and other reports without adding unnecessary speculation.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is professional and balanced, though there is a slight emphasis on the coach’s disappointment, which could be seen as a minor emotional tilt.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7512 days agoHajduk Zagreb priprema veliki rekonstruktivni projekt, s više od šest novih igrača koji su već potpisali, uključujući Alberto del Morala, Etnika Brrutija, Mathieua Acapandija, Anđela Šutala, Aleca Van Hoorenbeeka i Dalissona de Almeide. Klub je također u procesu preuzimanja bivšeg krilnog napadaca Istre 1961 Emanuel Ekonga, koji trenutno igra za Malmö, a njegov trokut je 450 tisuća eura. Ekong je igrao za različite klube u Italiji i Sloveniji, a sadržaj članaka navodi da je njegova prijava moguće trajna, ali nije jasno. Uz to, tekst sadrži referencu na video materijal koji zahtijeva omogućenje JavaScript-a.
Bias read (Center): Tematika je sportska, pa je politički nabitost blizu nuli. Članak ne predstavlja političku raspravu, već informaciju o transferima u nogometnom klubu. Nema evidentnog strujanja ili kritike, pa se smatra neutralnim.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Hajduk is close to signing Emmanuel Ekong from Malmö, citing the primary source document. It mentions his age, current club, contract details, and past clubs, aligning with the source. However, it does not mention the specific performance stats like goals and assi
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, reporting facts without strong emotional language. However, there is some emphasis on the potential transfer by mentioning it as a 'pojačanje' (strengthening), which could be seen as slightly positive framing.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6515 days ago Hajduk lost, but gained: Here's how much fell into the treasury after passing ŽilinaHajduk Zagreb je u uzvratnoj utakmici protiv Žiline u Slovačkoj poražen 1:2, ali je prethodno pobijedio 2:0 na Poljudu protiv ciparskog Pafosa, što mu omogućilo prolaz u sljedeću fazu kvalifikacija za Europsku ligu. Osim sportskog uspjeha, klub je također zabilježio financijski prihod – UEFA je nagradila svakog sudionika pretkola sa 175 tisuća eura, a dodatni bonus za prolaz u sljedeću fazu podignuo je ukupnu zaradu od Europe na 3,5 milijuna eura u srpnju. Klub će igraati iduću utakmicu 23. srpnja, kada na Poljudu gosti Pafos, a uzvrat će se igraati 30. srpnja na Cipru.
Bias read (Center): Vijest nije politički nabitu, već se tematski fokusira na sportski rezultat i finansijske posljedicе, što ne predstavlja politički kontroverzan subjekt. Stoga se smatra apolitičkom vijestju koja ne ima politički nabitu okvirnu strukturu.
Why factuality (75): This article confirms the match outcome and the financial reward from UEFA, providing specific figures (€175,000 per team, total €350,000 for Hajduk). It also gives clear match schedules and aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the aggregate win. However, it contains some formatting issu
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards positive coverage of the club's financial success, though it remains generally neutral. The focus on the monetary gain may introduce a minor bias compared to purely sporting outcomes.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 6514 days agoHajduk Zagreb osigurao je prolaz u 2. pretkolo Europske lige nakon poraze 1:2 u utakmici protiv Žilina, uz domaću pobedu 2:0. Ključni momenti uključivali su gol Aleca van Hoorenbeecka u prvoj minuti, jednakost Marka Roginića u 53. minuti, i pobjedu domaćina putem autogola Dario Melnjaka. Trener Gonzalo Garcia koristio je 4-2-3-1 formaciju, a Marko Livaja bio je najbolji igrač po ocjenama publike, s prosečnom ocjenom 3.8. Međutim, Livaja je imao konflikt sa trenerom tokom priprema, što je dovelo do njegovog izbjegavanja na prethodnim dogodnostima. Hajduk će nastaviti u Europski ligi protiv Pafosa.
Bias read (Center): Tematski sadržaj povezan s nogometom, što je apolitičan područje. Stoga se ne može identificirati politička predstavljena boja. Vrsta analize je neutralna jer se ne radi o političkom subjektu.
Why factuality (65): The article discusses the match against Žilina and financial rewards, but it does not reference Emmanuel Ekong or the transfer discussions. While it provides relevant match details, it misses the key transfer-related information from the primary source.
Why objectivity (65): The tone is neutral in describing the match outcome and financial aspects, but it lacks coverage of the transfer news, making it less balanced in relation to the full context of Hajduk's recent activities.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
