ON
← Back to feed
Tinubu’s fuel policy enriches govt, impoverishes masses — Donald Duke
NG🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Tinubu’s fuel policy enriches govt, impoverishes masses — Donald Duke

Donald Duke, former governor of Cross River State and presidential candidate of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), criticized President Bola Tinubu's economic policies, arguing they worsen poverty while benefiting the government. Duke claimed the administration's approach to fuel subsidies has shifted from one flawed system to another, enriching the state while impoverishing citizens. He stated that discussions between Tinubu's government and opposition parties showed no intention to revise these policies. Duke emphasized the need for practical economic reforms focused on growth and poverty alleviation, suggesting the PRP would implement such strategies if elected. He also stressed the importance of effective resource management for national development.

Donald Duke, former governor of Cross River State and presidential candidate of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), has accused President Bola Tinubu's administration of implementing economic policies that benefit the government while worsening the financial plight of ordinary Nigerians. In a recent statement, Duke criticized the Tinubu government for failing to provide relief during a time of economic distress, arguing that its approach has deepened poverty rather than fostering sustainable growth. The controversy centers around the administration’s handling of fuel subsidies, which Duke claims have shifted the burden onto citizens while allowing the government to profit. According to Duke, the previous fuel subsidy system, though flawed, was replaced by an even less effective alternative that continues to drain public funds and exacerbate inflation. He emphasized that this policy choice reflects a broader pattern of governance that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term national welfare. Duke pointed to recent discussions between the Tinubu administration and major opposition parties as further evidence of the administration’s unwillingness to reconsider its economic strategies. During these exchanges, he noted that there was little indication of openness to reforming policies that he describes as fundamentally anti-people. “President Tinubu has no plans to review or change key anti-people policies that have become the hallmarks of his administration,” Duke stated. His critique extends to the broader economic framework, which he argues fails to align with the realities of Nigerian society. The fuel subsidy policy, he explained, represents just one example of a larger systemic failure to create conditions conducive to prosperity. Instead of addressing the root causes of economic hardship, the administration has opted for measures that generate revenue for itself while leaving households struggling with rising costs. Duke called for a fundamental shift in how economic decisions are made, advocating for policies grounded in rigorous analysis and designed to uplift all segments of the population. He stressed the need for a transition from political posturing to actionable reforms that tackle both economic stagnation and extreme poverty. “The nation must move beyond debates and adopt well-informed and strategically-designed options to the current economic policies,” he urged. Looking ahead, Duke outlined the PRP’s vision for economic recovery, emphasizing a focus on strengthening the country’s economic foundations through informed policymaking and a commitment to improving living standards. Under the party’s proposed agenda, he said, economic strength would be built on thorough evaluation of available resources, coupled with policies that directly serve the interests of the populace. He concluded by highlighting the urgent need for leadership that can manage Nigeria’s wealth responsibly and translate it into meaningful development. “Nigerians deserve an administration that will respond to good management and growth and development of our assets,” Duke asserted. His remarks underscore the growing frustration among critics who believe the current administration is failing to meet the basic economic needs of the majority.

1 reports

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 65yesterday
Tinubu’s fuel policy enriches govt, impoverishes masses — Donald Duke

Donald Duke, former governor of Cross River State and presidential candidate of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), criticized President Bola Tinubu's economic policies, arguing they worsen poverty while benefiting the government. Duke claimed the administration's approach to fuel subsidies has shifted from one flawed system to another, enriching the state while impoverishing citizens. He stated that discussions between Tinubu's government and opposition parties showed no intention to revise these policies. Duke emphasized the need for practical economic reforms focused on growth and poverty alleviation, suggesting the PRP would implement such strategies if elected. He also stressed the importance of effective resource management for national development.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Tinubu administration's fuel policy as 'anti-people' and criticizes it for deepening poverty, using terms like 'scam' and 'impoverishes citizens.' The emphasis on government enrichment versus citizen suffering aligns with left-leaning critiques of neoliberal economic policies.

Why factuality (85): The article reports Donald Duke's public accusation against the Tinubu administration regarding its fuel policy, citing specific claims about economic impact and policy failures. While there is no primary source document to verify these claims directly, the content aligns with common criticisms of s

Why objectivity (65): The article presents Duke's critique of the Tinubu administration in a strongly critical tone, using emotive language such as 'impoverishes masses' and 'anti-people policies.' It frames the issue as a failure of governance and emphasizes the negative consequences for citizens, suggesting a partisan

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories