ON
← Back to feed
'Aap BJP ke ho kya?' Rahul's response to question on cops injured during student protest
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 days ago

'Aap BJP ke ho kya?' Rahul's response to question on cops injured during student protest

Rahul Gandhi, the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, responded sharply to a reporter's question about a press conference held by families of Delhi Police personnel injured during student protests in New Delhi on July 20. The families shared their experiences, describing the emotional trauma caused by the injuries sustained by police officers during the clashes. One officer's wife recounted the pain of seeing her husband return home injured, while another family member accused the protests of being manipulated by non-student elements aiming to undermine legitimate student activism. Rahul Gandhi previously called for an independent investigation into the police actions during the protests and criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for allegedly threatening student protesters. Meanwhile, members of the INDIA bloc staged a protest in Parliament, demanding Amit Shah's resignation and criticizing him for his absence.

Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Congress MP, sharply replied to a reporter’s question regarding a press conference held by the families of Delhi Police personnel injured during the student protests at Jantar Mantar. On Friday, outside the Parliament complex, the Congress leader was asked to comment on the gathering, where the relatives of injured officers shared their experiences and demanded justice. In response, Gandhi reportedly said, “Aap BJP ke ho kya?”, translating to “Are you from the BJP?”, a pointed remark that underscored the political tensions surrounding the incident. The families of the injured Delhi Police personnel had previously addressed the media, detailing the physical and emotional toll of the violence they endured. According to reports, several officers remain hospitalized, requiring ongoing medical care. One family member, the daughter of an injured sub-inspector, recounted how her father was pulled by a mob and nearly lynched near the Jantar Mantar stage. She stated that he remained unconscious in the hospital for nearly four hours before regaining consciousness. This account highlights the severity of the situation and the personal anguish experienced by the affected families. Other relatives emphasized that the violence was not inflicted by genuine student protesters but by individuals acting on behalf of political groups. They accused the BJP of sending "goons" to disrupt the demonstrations and undermine the legitimacy of the protests. These claims align with broader narratives circulating among opposition parties, suggesting that the state apparatus has been manipulated to suppress dissent. The families also called for accountability, urging that those responsible for the violence be brought to justice while ensuring that legitimate students are not unfairly targeted. Gandhi, meanwhile, has consistently advocated for an impartial inquiry into the alleged police misconduct during the July 20 protests. On Thursday, he called for the formation of a high-powered committee monitored by the Supreme Court to investigate the incidents. This demand follows his previous criticisms of the central government, including direct accusations against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. In a social media post, Gandhi alleged that authorities were intimidating young activists, warning that such tactics risk alienating the youth of the nation. The political fallout from the protests has escalated, with BJP MP Anurag Singh Thakur moving a privilege notice against Gandhi over remarks he made in the Lok Sabha on July 29. Similarly, Congress MP KC Venugopal announced plans to file a privilege motion against Union minister Jitendra Singh, accusing him of misleading the House by asserting that no firings occurred during the protests. These legal challenges reflect the deepening divide between ruling and opposition factions, with each side leveraging parliamentary procedures to assert its narrative. Amid this backdrop, the families of the injured police officers continue to seek recognition and redress. Their efforts have drawn support from various political entities, including the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP). Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the CJP, expressed solidarity with the officers while criticizing the government for failing to protect peaceful demonstrators. He argued that the violence was orchestrated by BJP-aligned actors rather than genuine protesters, reinforcing the perception that the state is being used as a tool of political suppression. Additionally, lawyer-turned-CJP spokesperson Ratna Singh called for greater visibility for the protesters and their families, expressing hope that 1,000 injured participants could hold a press conference to share their experiences. Her comments highlight the growing pressure on the administration to address the grievances of all stakeholders, not just those aligned with the ruling party. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on the need for transparency and accountability. With ongoing legal battles, public outrage, and calls for reform, the events surrounding the Jantar Mantar protests continue to shape the political landscape in India. The outcomes of these developments will likely determine the trajectory of public discourse and institutional responses to dissent in the months ahead.

3 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
'BJP ke ho kya?': Rahul Gandhi's response to reporter over Delhi Police kin's presser

Families of Delhi Police personnel injured during a student protest at Jantar Mantar recently addressed the media, demanding justice for their loved ones and alleging they were attacked by a mob. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, when questioned about the press conference, sarcastically asked, 'Aap BJP ke ho kya?' (Are you from the BJP?), suggesting possible political bias. He called for an independent Supreme Court-monitored inquiry into the police action against students, citing alleged brutality. The families described their relatives' injuries and claimed their suffering was ignored amidst claims of police excesses. They highlighted specific incidents, including a police officer being nearly lynched. Meanwhile, political tensions escalated as BJP MP Anurag Singh Thakur filed a privilege notice against Gandhi over past remarks.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Rahul Gandhi's questioning of the reporters as a pointed critique of the BJP, using sarcasm ('Aap BJP ke ho kya?') to imply political bias. It emphasizes Gandhi's call for an independent judicial inquiry, aligning with left-leaning advocacy for accountability. The focus on police-

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Rahul Gandhi's response to a reporter about the press conference by the families of injured Delhi Police personnel. It provides direct quotes and contextualizes the situation without introducing new information beyond what is reported. However, it does not reference th

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat biased towards Rahul Gandhi's perspective, particularly in highlighting his provocative response to the reporter. While it presents the events neutrally, the emphasis on Gandhi's reaction suggests a slight editorial lean towards portraying him as confrontational.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 656 days ago
'Aap BJP ke ho kya?' Rahul's response to question on cops injured during student protest

Rahul Gandhi, the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, responded sharply to a reporter's question about a press conference held by families of Delhi Police personnel injured during student protests in New Delhi on July 20. The families shared their experiences, describing the emotional trauma caused by the injuries sustained by police officers during the clashes. One officer's wife recounted the pain of seeing her husband return home injured, while another family member accused the protests of being manipulated by non-student elements aiming to undermine legitimate student activism. Rahul Gandhi previously called for an independent investigation into the police actions during the protests and criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for allegedly threatening student protesters. Meanwhile, members of the INDIA bloc staged a protest in Parliament, demanding Amit Shah's resignation and criticizing him for his absence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, quoting both Rahul Gandhi's responses and the statements made by the families of the injured police personnel. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, providing information from multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Rahul Gandhi's accusations against Amit Shah regarding the use of force during the protests and the involvement of the CJP. It includes direct quotes and details about the press conference, aligning with the broader narrative of police action. However, it does not refe

Why objectivity (65): The tone is clearly supportive of Rahul Gandhi's allegations against Amit Shah, suggesting a bias towards the opposition's stance and less neutrality in presenting the issue.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 606 days ago
'BJP goons, not students, attacked police': Dipke expresses sympathy for Delhi cops injured during Jantar Mantar protest

Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), expressed sympathy for Delhi Police officers injured during a protest at Jantar Mantar, while accusing the BJP of sending 'goons' to attack police and disrupt the demonstration. Dipke claimed that students were not responsible for the violence against police and argued that the government is targeting innocent students to deter future protests. He suggested that habitual offenders, rather than students, should be addressed under the law. CJP spokesperson Ratna Singh called for a press conference by injured protesters and their families, highlighting incidents like pellet gun use, sexual harassment, and medical emergencies. The reactions follow a press conference by families of injured police personnel who criticized the lack of attention to their suffering amidst claims of police brutality.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a politically motivated attack by BJP 'goons' against police, implying state-sponsored violence. It emphasizes the suffering of protesters and criticizes the government's handling of the situation, aligning with left-wing narratives that highlight police overreach.

Why factuality (70): The article discusses political reactions to the CJP protests, including accusations of collusion between Congress and BJP. It references the CJP and the government's handling of the protests but lacks detailed information from the primary source document. Some claims appear to be based on political

Why objectivity (60): The tone is clearly aligned with the AAP's perspective, criticizing the Congress and BJP for their perceived collaboration. The article uses loaded language and suggests conspiracies, which undermines its objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories