This is the third time Thompson's been grounded for wild construction in Caveheads.
Thompson has received his third fine from the State Inspectorate for illegal construction in Čavogлавa, Croatia. The inspectorate stated that Thompson did not fully comply with the order to remove unauthorized structures, leading to the imposition of another financial penalty. If the illegal buildings remain after this third fine, authorities may demolish them through a third party and charge Thompson for the costs. Thompson previously claimed the structures were temporary, such as a canopy and storage unit used during construction, and had plans to dismantle them once his family home was completed. However, he paused all work due to a personal tragedy. In a public apology, Thompson expressed regret for violating regulations and acknowledged the impact on local wildlife, promising to replant vegetation to compensate.
The Croatian State Inspectorate has announced a procurement worth six million euros aimed at demolishing unauthorized buildings across the country, ranging from weekend cottages and garages to commercial halls, jetties, and breakwaters. The announcement was made on Monday, with the work to be carried out based on decisions issued by building inspectors. An overarching agreement will be signed over a period of 36 months with multiple contractors. According to the law governing the state inspectorate, the removal of unlawful structures must be executed through third-party entities, meaning external contractors. Specific locations for demolition will be determined individually during the contracting process. Due to the nature of the work, the tender document outlines approximate quantities since it is unclear beforehand how many and which types of structures will be demolished. The planned demolition includes residential buildings ranging from ground-level structures to those exceeding three floors, as well as concrete and steel halls, warehouses, and sports facilities. It also covers simpler structures such as garages, awnings, kiosks, and wooden weekend cottages. A specific section addresses maritime structures, including the removal of jetties, breakwaters, and coastal walls, even extending to underwater demolition up to five meters deep. The largest portion of the tender involves mechanical demolition of ground-level structures and the transportation of construction waste to landfills. The tender document also includes the separation of reinforcement from concrete, recycling of waste using mobile crushers, and, in more complex cases, the preparation of a demolition project. Contractors will have to handle all types of waste, including asbestos-containing materials, in accordance with waste management regulations. The most economically advantageous bid will be determined based on price, which accounts for 80 percent of the evaluation, and the specific experience of the nominated site engineer, valued at 20 percent. The bidder whose professional leads projects worth more than 1.5 million euros receives the highest points for experience. For this open public procurement process, a preliminary consultation with interested economic subjects was published on Monday in the Electronic Gazette of Public Procurement, lasting until September 9. After considering the received comments and proposals, the State Inspectorate will publish a report and proceed with the formal bidding process. In another related case, the Thompson family faced legal action after being found non-compliant with a decision to remove unauthorized structures built on their property in Čavogлавa. According to the inspectorate, control inspections revealed that the executor had not acted within the prescribed timeframe, resulting in a financial penalty. Further checks confirmed that only part of the structures had been removed, and the decision was made to issue a third fine to compel compliance with the removal order. If, following this third fine, the inspectorate confirms that illegal structures remain on-site, they will proceed with demolition via third-party contractors and bill the investor accordingly. Earlier this year, the State Inspectorate confirmed that Thompson had illegally constructed buildings in Čavogлавa, following an inspection conducted after a report aired in the program Provjereno, where journalist Danka Derifaj highlighted the unauthorized construction on that location. After the inspectorate's decision granting Thompson 90 days to dismantle the unauthorized structures in Čavogлавa, he responded on Facebook stating that the structures were a canopy and a modular storage unit used for tools and worker protection against weather conditions. He emphasized that these structures were not intended to remain permanently and that he had planned to remove them after completing his family home. Thompson also mentioned that he had paused construction plans due to a family tragedy. “My plan was long ago to finish my family house, but due to a family tragedy that occurred, I stopped all works and extended everything further,” he wrote, adding that he acknowledges having made a mistake. “I apologize to everyone I've brought into such an uncomfortable situation.” Thompson expressed regret to birds, snakes, ants, and other wildlife affected by the construction, promising to plant twice as much shrubs, grass, and undergrowth to compensate for the lost habitat. He also apologized to rain, wind, and dew for taking away two hundred square meters from their potential landing space. The entire situation prompted him to accelerate the start of his house construction in Čavogлавa, where he intends to live the rest of his life.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Marko Perković Thompson, a singer, has been issued a third financial penalty totaling €30,500 for illegal construction on land in Čavoglave. The penalties were imposed by the State Inspectorate after he failed to remove unauthorized buildings despite previous warnings. Although some structures have been removed, the inspectorate states that Thompson did not fully comply with the order. Thompson's legal team has appealed the first two fines to the Administrative Court in Split, but the case remains unresolved. The inspection process continues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legal proceedings against a private individual regarding illegal construction. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content focuses on legal actions taken by the State Inspectorate and mentions the lack
Why factuality (98): This article provides precise figures and detailed information about the three fines totaling 30,500 euros, matching the primary source exactly. It also mentions the specific land parcels involved and the legal actions taken, showing full fidelity to the original report.
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without emotional language. However, it briefly touches on Thompson’s personal situation, which could be seen as slightly more empathetic than purely objective reporting.
Thompson has received his third fine from the State Inspectorate for illegal construction in Čavogлавa, Croatia. The inspectorate stated that Thompson did not fully comply with the order to remove unauthorized structures, leading to the imposition of another financial penalty. If the illegal buildings remain after this third fine, authorities may demolish them through a third party and charge Thompson for the costs. Thompson previously claimed the structures were temporary, such as a canopy and storage unit used during construction, and had plans to dismantle them once his family home was completed. However, he paused all work due to a personal tragedy. In a public apology, Thompson expressed regret for violating regulations and acknowledged the impact on local wildlife, promising to replant vegetation to compensate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legal proceedings against Thompson without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from both the State Inspectorate and Thompson himself, providing balanced perspectives on the situation. There is no evident ideological framing or biased ph
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the third fine issued to Marko Perković Thompson by the State Inspectorate for illegal construction in Čavoglave. It references the previous fines and the ongoing legal process, aligning closely with the primary source document from Dnevnik.hr. The details about the sp
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral but includes some emotional elements when quoting Thompson’s statement about his family tragedy. While not overtly biased, the article does present Thompson’s perspective with some empathy, which slightly affects objectivity.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.