ON
← Back to feed
There’s something off about this year’s Strictly line-up — and I know why
United Kingdom⚽ Sports11 days ago

There’s something off about this year’s Strictly line-up — and I know why

The article discusses concerns about the 2023 lineup of the UK's Strictly Come Dancing, noting that it includes several lesser-known personalities such as a football influencer, a former Love Island contestant, and a dog trainer. The author suggests that the lineup feels 'off' compared to previous years, possibly reflecting the show's need for new faces amid recent controversies and changes in presentation. The article mentions the show's upcoming transformation, including a new set design and presenters, which has led to uncertainty among viewers. It also references past scandals involving the show, including allegations of bullying, substance abuse, and inappropriate behavior, suggesting that the current lineup may be a result of the show's ongoing challenges.

There’s something unusual about this year’s Strictly line-up, and the reasons behind it are becoming clearer. The BBC’s flagship dance competition, which has long been a staple of British television, is undergoing a major transformation. This includes a complete overhaul of its presenting team and a redesigned studio set. Among the changes, the cast lineup has drawn attention for its eclectic mix of personalities, some familiar, others entirely unexpected. The inclusion of figures such as football influencer John Nellis, ex-Love Islander Cach Mercer, and Kim Kardashian’s hairdresser Chris Appleton has sparked conversation among viewers, many of whom find the selection puzzling. The shift in the line-up reflects broader changes within the show itself. For the first time since its inception, Strictly will feature three new presenters: Emma Willis, Josh Widdecombe, and Johannes Radebe. This marks the end of the long-standing partnership between Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman, whose tenure defined much of the show’s golden era. The transition has raised concerns among fans, who are accustomed to the stability and familiarity of the previous hosting duo. With the new presenters stepping into the spotlight, the show faces the challenge of maintaining its appeal while navigating a changing landscape of entertainment preferences. The current cast includes several high-profile names, though not all are traditionally associated with mainstream fame. Melanie Walters, best known for her role as Stacey’s mother in Gavin and Stacey, brings a sense of familiarity to the lineup. Similarly, Lacey Turner, who portrayed Stacey Slater in the same show, adds another layer of recognition. Other notable entries include former England rugby player Shaun Wright-Phillips and Paralympic champion Dame Sarah Storey. However, the presence of individuals like dog trainer Graeme Hall and Cach Mercer, a former contestant on Love Island, highlights a departure from the traditional celebrity casting seen in past seasons. This year’s line-up also features Chris Appleton, a figure who may seem an unlikely choice for a dance competition. As Kim Kardashian’s personal hairdresser, Appleton enjoys a substantial social media following and a direct connection to one of the world’s most recognizable personalities. His participation could bring a unique level of exposure to the show, potentially boosting its profile in ways that extend beyond the dance floor. The decision to cast such a diverse group of participants appears to be influenced by the show’s need to attract a wider audience. With the format evolving and the presentation team changing, the producers may be seeking to align the show with contemporary trends in entertainment. This approach, however, risks alienating longtime fans who have grown attached to the show’s established formula. Behind the scenes, the show is grappling with the fallout from past controversies. Over the years, Strictly has faced scrutiny over allegations of bullying, substance abuse, and inappropriate behavior on set. These issues have contributed to a growing perception of instability within the program. While the show’s management insists that the new direction represents a positive step forward, critics argue that the changes may not fully address the underlying challenges facing the production. Despite these uncertainties, the show continues to draw interest from a range of celebrities willing to take a chance. Some, like Dani Dyer, are looking to recover from setbacks, while others, such as John Nellis, aim to expand their careers into mainstream sports commentary. The willingness of these individuals to participate underscores the enduring appeal of the platform, even amid the show’s ongoing transformation. As the season approaches, the success of this new iteration of Strictly will depend on how well it balances innovation with tradition. Whether the revamped format resonates with audiences remains to be seen, but one thing is certain, the dance floor continues to serve as a space where fame, influence, and talent converge.

1 reports

iNews logoiNewsIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 6011 days ago
There’s something off about this year’s Strictly line-up — and I know why

The article discusses concerns about the 2023 lineup of the UK's Strictly Come Dancing, noting that it includes several lesser-known personalities such as a football influencer, a former Love Island contestant, and a dog trainer. The author suggests that the lineup feels 'off' compared to previous years, possibly reflecting the show's need for new faces amid recent controversies and changes in presentation. The article mentions the show's upcoming transformation, including a new set design and presenters, which has led to uncertainty among viewers. It also references past scandals involving the show, including allegations of bullying, substance abuse, and inappropriate behavior, suggesting that the current lineup may be a result of the show's ongoing challenges.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on entertainment and sports programming rather than politics, making it apolitical. While it discusses the show's challenges and changes, it does not take a clear ideological stance or frame the discussion in a politically charged manner. The tone remains observational and does.

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific names of celebrities participating in Strictly and mentions changes to the show's format and presenters, which aligns with typical reporting on such events. It references past participants and actors, which are generally verifiable. However, it lacks direct confirmation

Why objectivity (60): The tone of the article leans towards a critical perspective, suggesting that the line-up feels 'desperate' and implying that celebrities are avoiding the show due to uncertainty. This introduces a subjective interpretation rather than presenting a balanced view of the situation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories