ON
← Back to feed
There’s no getting around it: We need to talk about this irksome word
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives11 days ago

There’s no getting around it: We need to talk about this irksome word

The article discusses the increasing usage of 'around' in place of 'about' in both formal and informal contexts, suggesting a linguistic shift that may reflect broader cultural or stylistic changes. The author notes this trend across various domains including legal proceedings, media commentary, and academic writing, highlighting instances where speakers and writers substitute 'around' for 'about' in everyday speech and writing. Examples include testimony in an anti-corruption inquiry and quotes from a television program examining housing policies. The author contrasts this trend with the more traditional and precise use of 'about,' referencing historical examples like Shakespeare's 'Much Ado About Nothing' and a contemporary article by Ben Macintyre in The Times. The piece explores the implications of this linguistic evolution, noting its prevalence in professional fields and questioning whether it represents a decline in precision or a natural linguistic adaptation.

In an increasingly linguistic landscape, the shift from "about" to "around" has sparked quiet yet persistent debate among linguists, writers, and everyday speakers. This subtle change in usage has been noted across multiple domains, legal proceedings, public discourse, media commentary, and has led to a growing awareness of how language evolves, often without fanfare. The phenomenon has gained traction recently, particularly in Australia, where the transition appears to be accelerating. At the heart of this linguistic shift lies a seemingly minor yet culturally significant transformation: the increasing preference for "around" over "about." The trend emerged prominently during hearings under the Independent Commission Against Corruption's Operation Rosny, where witnesses repeatedly used "around" instead of "about." One witness remarked, “I don’t have a recollection around it,” prompting observers to question whether this substitution was merely a coincidence or part of a broader linguistic movement. Such instances are not isolated. Across broadcasts, printed materials, and spoken exchanges, "around" has begun to replace "about," especially in contexts involving discussion, concern, or framing of topics. Phrases like “concerns around,” “conflicts of interest around,” and “demands around the Strait of Hormuz’s reopening” have become commonplace, raising eyebrows among those who value precision in language. This linguistic drift has not gone unnoticed by literary critics and language scholars. Three years ago, a writer encountered the shift while reading a piece by Ben Macintyre in The Times, which described a cultural clash in Paris over the preservation of second-hand bookstalls along the Seine. The article, titled “The Seine, they say, is the only river in the world that runs between two bookshelves,” omitted the word “around” entirely, using “about” instead. The omission seemed deliberate, suggesting a conscious effort to streamline phrasing. Yet, the writer found themselves questioning whether such a choice reflected a broader linguistic evolution or simply a stylistic preference. Historical records indicate that the migration of "around" into common usage began decades earlier. In 1987, Ben Yagoda, an American linguist and professor, observed the trend firsthand. At a social gathering, he overheard a psychologist refer to “articles around weight issues.” His wife later noted that professionals in the helping fields frequently employed the term. Yagoda explained that prepositions, including "about" and "around," are inherently fluid, and the gradual replacement of "about" with "around" aligns with a natural linguistic progression. He argued that "around" offers a more dynamic and inclusive sense, allowing for discussions that span multiple perspectives or dimensions. Despite these observations, some argue that the shift represents a loss of clarity. "About" carries a range of meanings, from proximity to approximation, that "around" lacks. For instance, "about" can imply a general vicinity or a broad scope, whereas "around" suggests a more diffuse or abstract context. This nuance has led some to view the substitution as a form of linguistic laziness, a move toward vagueness rather than specificity. Others, however, see it as a reflection of modern communication styles, where ambiguity is sometimes preferred over exactitude. The use of "around" has also found its way into literature and popular culture. Jules Verne’s classic novel Around the World in Eighty Days exemplifies the word’s versatility, while expressions like “going around in circles” have acquired new layers of meaning, particularly in political discourse. The phrase has been invoked to describe the repetitive nature of certain negotiations, such as those surrounding international peace efforts. In this light, "around" has become both a tool and a symbol, a word that encapsulates the complexity of contemporary dialogue. As the linguistic shift continues, it remains unclear whether it will persist or reverse. What is evident, however, is that language is evolving, and with it, our understanding of how we communicate. Whether this change reflects a deeper cultural shift or merely a passing fad remains to be seen. For now, the word "around" holds sway, and its influence grows.

2 reports

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 4011 days ago
There’s no getting around it: We need to talk about this irksome word

The article discusses the increasing usage of 'around' in place of 'about' in both formal and informal contexts, suggesting a linguistic shift that may reflect broader cultural or stylistic changes. The author notes this trend across various domains including legal proceedings, media commentary, and academic writing, highlighting instances where speakers and writers substitute 'around' for 'about' in everyday speech and writing. Examples include testimony in an anti-corruption inquiry and quotes from a television program examining housing policies. The author contrasts this trend with the more traditional and precise use of 'about,' referencing historical examples like Shakespeare's 'Much Ado About Nothing' and a contemporary article by Ben Macintyre in The Times. The piece explores the implications of this linguistic evolution, noting its prevalence in professional fields and questioning whether it represents a decline in precision or a natural linguistic adaptation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the linguistic shift toward using 'around' over 'about' as a subtle but significant change in modern communication, which the author implies reflects a broader cultural or stylistic drift. While not overtly political, the tone suggests concern over the erosion of precise language,

Why factuality (50): This article is nearly identical to the first, suggesting it may be a duplicate or a very similar opinion piece. It presents the same examples from the ICAC hearing and the Four Corners investigation without additional supporting evidence. As with the first article, there is no primary source docume

Why objectivity (40): Like the first article, this piece maintains a subjective and critical tone toward the use of 'around' instead of 'about.' The language remains emotionally charged, focusing on the perceived decline in linguistic standards. The lack of alternative viewpoints or discussion of potential reasons behind

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 4011 days ago
There’s no getting around it: We need to talk about this irksome word

The article discusses the increasing usage of 'around' in place of 'about' in both formal and informal contexts, suggesting a linguistic shift that may reflect broader cultural or stylistic changes. The author notes this trend across various domains including legal proceedings, media commentary, and academic writing, highlighting instances where speakers and writers substitute 'around' for 'about' in everyday speech and writing. Examples include testimony in corruption investigations and quotes from interviews. The author contrasts this trend with the more traditional and precise use of 'about,' referencing historical examples like Shakespeare's 'Much Ado About Nothing' and modern literary works. The piece also references earlier observations by linguist Ben Yagoda, who noted similar patterns in professional fields such as psychology.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the linguistic shift toward 'around' as a subtle but significant change in language use, which the author implies reflects broader societal trends. While not overtly political, the tone suggests concern over the erosion of precise language, aligning with a left-leaning perspective

Why factuality (50): The article discusses the increasing usage of 'around' in place of 'about' in speech and writing, citing examples from an ICAC hearing and a Four Corners investigation. While these examples are presented as common occurrences, there is no primary source document to verify the frequency or significan

Why objectivity (40): The tone of the article is opinionated and somewhat critical of the substitution of 'around' for 'about.' It uses emotive language like 'irksome word' and frames the issue as a matter of linguistic correctness rather than a neutral observation. The author expresses personal frustration with the tren

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories